So you can't answer the question? None of that was anything that I asked… or said. Care to try again?
But, just before you do… let's look at what you're trying to say here first…
at least you didn't got the gun disarm.
Careful. All I said was "not sure about the weapon defence… pretty sure you were shot in the pistol defence"… and qualified it by pointing out that it was about 6 frames in a tiny, low resolution box on a screen. You think that's enough to extrapolate that I don't understand "jujutsu and krav maga"? Dude… not even close.
when the training partner can't pull the trigger in the time from me moving my hands to it and redirect the barrel (except of he just wanting to shoot me without posing), then i wouldn't get shot in this case.
There's an issue of grammar in that sentence, which makes it hard to follow, but if you're saying that you were fast enough to move the barrel before he could fire, I'm not so sure… the bigger issue, of course, is that you're not getting yourself out of the line of fire at all… and are relying on jamming the slide with your hand on top, all of which can lead to the gun discharging unexpectedly… so… no. Not buying that excuse.
not to mention that knife and gun disarming always would be gambling.
Which is why you should as many safety nets and measures in place as possible… which were lacking in both the knife and pistol defence shown. I also note that each and every technique shown, unarmed or not, is against very passive (and largely unrealistic) "attackers"… which doesn't help. Of course, that could very easily be more to do with your performance, and the level of your training partner/dummy, but it does show a gap in the training paradigm.
just take a krav maga seminar or something like that to learn gun and knife defense and you'll see, its very similar.
Oh, you really don't have much of an idea who you're dealing with, do you? Mate, I've been teaching this stuff for a decade now, training it for over twice that long. I am more than familiar with Krav and it's methods, and frankly, they're only one of many… and not everything they do is actually good. That said, as I mentioned, it could simply be that you're simply not up to the task of presenting it well enough.
but i don't ever seek critique, because i know how it ends.
in martial arts forums everyone can do everything better (but never shows), thats normal.
Well, the comment that no-one had taken you to task over the knife defence seemed to indicate that you expected some debate…
sure, in a sword fight, you'd destroy me. or in a tkd fight, they kick my ***, judokas in a judo fight throw me around and stuff.... for me the mixture matters (like for real fights).
And this is relevant how?
EDIT: I see you did go back and answer with Jikishinkage Ryu… I will say that, if this is the case, there is no trace of anything close to skill, understanding, or ability with a sword that you have received from them… and your comments on what you did and didn't take from it show that lack of grasp on the subject.
i've expected some common debate about knife defense. 
