Really knowing your aikido

brothershaw

Purple Belt
Joined
Jan 12, 2003
Messages
332
Reaction score
7
Location
New York
To all aikido praticioners, how often if ever do you try to use your aikido against another martial artist. I am not talking about sparring or point sparring, but attempting to use your technique/s against another trained martial artist who is resisting/ and attacking so you gain some perspective of how difficult or easy some things may be to do.
Always and only practicing with people of your style and your school can tend to give you a comfort zone that only relates to your style or school.
I know some people study aikido for self defense and i am looking for honest answers. This is not meant to be an inflammatory question.
 

Yari

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 1, 2002
Messages
1,364
Reaction score
22
Location
Århus, Denmark
We'll I do jujitsu and Arnis also, so yes I use my aikido.

Does it work, yes. Does it fail, yes. Do I learn from working out in other styles yes, but as time passes they blend, and they fit together.

/Yari
 
S

SRyuFighter

Guest
I don't do Aikido, I am a karate man. But my best friend does Aikido and we spar very often. He catches me off guard often and will throw me around, vice versa. However after he throws me one time I learn how to roll out of the move and that move is not very effective anymore.
 

arnisador

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 28, 2001
Messages
44,573
Reaction score
456
Location
Terre Haute, IN
There's an interesting article on this ("Uke-from-Hell") in one of the Aikido magazines--Aikido Today? Aikido Quarterly? I just saw it on the newsstand this evening!
 
Y

yilisifu

Guest
If I remember right, O-Sensei once said that "80% of Aikido is atemi," or something like that. In the earlier years of Aikido, atemi was a standard part of executing many techniques, but that has now been brushed to the side.
Could it be that atemi is what helped make those techniques so effective in yesteryear?
 

kenmpoka

Blue Belt
Joined
May 23, 2002
Messages
218
Reaction score
1
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Originally posted by yilisifu
If I remember right, O-Sensei once said that "80% of Aikido is atemi," or something like that. In the earlier years of Aikido, atemi was a standard part of executing many techniques, but that has now been brushed to the side.
Could it be that atemi is what helped make those techniques so effective in yesteryear?
Absolutely YiliSifu,

O-Sensei's involvement with religion, definitely had some negative effects in the latter years. In the early years it was more like Daito Ryu, and his Dojo was called the "Hell Dojo".

Beginning to intermediate students must always depend on multiple atemi specially in between the spinning techniques until their timming and techniques mature.

Respectfully,
 

Yari

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 1, 2002
Messages
1,364
Reaction score
22
Location
Århus, Denmark
Originally posted by arnisador
There's an interesting article on this ("Uke-from-Hell") in one of the Aikido magazines--Aikido Today? Aikido Quarterly? I just saw it on the newsstand this evening!


I've just recieved the mag. and havn't had a chance to read it yet. But I'm looking forward to it.

/Yari
 

Yari

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 1, 2002
Messages
1,364
Reaction score
22
Location
Århus, Denmark
Originally posted by kenmpoka
Absolutely YiliSifu,

O-Sensei's involvement with religion, definitely had some negative effects in the latter years. In the early years it was more like Daito Ryu, and his Dojo was called the "Hell Dojo".

Beginning to intermediate students must always depend on multiple atemi specially in between the spinning techniques until their timming and techniques mature.

Respectfully,

I would say that atmei is a natural part of Aikido, even if you an "expert". But you wouldn't be dependant upon the atemi as you would as a beginner.

/Yari
 
C

cosgod

Guest
I have not practiced with others outside of aikido, but I have noticed in going to seminars in other states, that just practicing my aikido style with another aikido style aikidoka brings to light a lot of problems! A difference in attacks and a difference in uke and ukemi, as well as in a difference in nage and technique. I think in our dojo, we are all very 'cooperative' with each other until we get to a certain stage of practice where we can be a little less cooperative, and actually challenge nage more.

I think the hardest one for me to adjust to is when doing shomenuch nikkyo or ikkyo URA, that if uke doesn’t bend their arm, it totally throws me off. I need that arm bent to bring them around. In our dojo, we are taught as uke to bend the arm a bit to keep the elbow from being hyper-extended or hurt. But it also makes the technique much easier to me. So I think I have it down pretty well until a newcomer or a visitor comes and doesn’t bend their elbow. I think it is good to practice with different dojos and styles within aikido - but I imagine I am quite a ways off from being able to do competent technique with a non-aikidoist!

But I look forward to the day when I can! It will be interesting to learn from another art.

Peace!
 

Yari

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 1, 2002
Messages
1,364
Reaction score
22
Location
Århus, Denmark
Originally posted by arnisador
There's an interesting article on this ("Uke-from-Hell") in one of the Aikido magazines--Aikido Today? Aikido Quarterly? I just saw it on the newsstand this evening!

OK, now I've read it.

It's a good article. It's about how to handle uke's that dont react that nicly. It uses the 9-11 attack to show how the real life situation is applied for aikido.

What I got from the article was that randori or free techniques should be an important part of aikido pratice, because there you get closer to reality.

I would say that it's a good read for all MA.

/Yari
 
Top