Neko no Myojutsu

windwalker099124 154

Master of Arts
three-cats.jpg

An old post on three cats brought up the Zen-style story Neko no Myojutsu often used as a teaching example.

What follows is a paraphrase, shared only to frame a question.


A swordsman named Shōken was plagued by a fierce rat. His own cat failed, as did some neighboring cats known for skill and courage. Each tried to overcome the rat through ability, spirit, or strategy — and each was driven off.

As a last resort, Shōken sent for a quiet, unremarkable cat. She entered the room calmly, without intent or display. The rat froze at her presence, and she simply carried it out.
Later, the other cats asked her what they were missing. Each described their approach:

  1. skill and agility,
  2. overwhelming spirit,
  3. yielding and following.


None of these worked against that rat.

The story continues with mention of yet another cat in the neighborhood — one who had reached a state of non-intent / non-action, whose mere presence caused rats to leave without confrontation.
Shōken then asked what was meant by “neither self nor opponent.”
The cat explained that as long as there is a sense of self, opposition naturally arises. When the mind is still and free of grasping, there is no conflict. When even that stillness is forgotten, action occurs naturally, without intention or effort — nothing is forced, yet nothing is left undone.


Question:
Would you say your own training today reflects one of these cats, a combination of them, or something else entirely?
 
I remember Suzuki Tatsuo 8th Dan Hanshi trying to tell us this story at the ‘end of seminar reception’ in the early 80s. His broken English made it a bit tortuous and then, he forgot the ending! But promised it’d be in his new book which it was! 😂
 
three-cats.jpg

An old post on three cats brought up the Zen-style story Neko no Myojutsu often used as a teaching example.

What follows is a paraphrase, shared only to frame a question.


A swordsman named Shōken was plagued by a fierce rat. His own cat failed, as did some neighboring cats known for skill and courage. Each tried to overcome the rat through ability, spirit, or strategy — and each was driven off.

As a last resort, Shōken sent for a quiet, unremarkable cat. She entered the room calmly, without intent or display. The rat froze at her presence, and she simply carried it out.
Later, the other cats asked her what they were missing. Each described their approach:

  1. skill and agility,
  2. overwhelming spirit,
  3. yielding and following.


None of these worked against that rat.

The story continues with mention of yet another cat in the neighborhood — one who had reached a state of non-intent / non-action, whose mere presence caused rats to leave without confrontation.
Shōken then asked what was meant by “neither self nor opponent.”
The cat explained that as long as there is a sense of self, opposition naturally arises. When the mind is still and free of grasping, there is no conflict. When even that stillness is forgotten, action occurs naturally, without intention or effort — nothing is forced, yet nothing is left undone.


Question:
Would you say your own training today reflects one of these cats, a combination of them, or something else entirely?
Similar to the Taoist story of the emperor's rooster being trained for a cockfight. The emperor asked the trainer if it was ready to which the trainer replied that it was too full of spirit and aggression. Eventually (I've shortened the story) the trainer tells the emperor that the rooster now is calm, its feathers remaining unruffled. "The other birds will take one look at him and run."

Also similar to the story of a Japanese tea master who was challenged to battle by a Samurai. Not knowing the first thing about fighting, he asked a sword master friend what to do. The advice given was to enter the fight with the same spirit as if he was performing the tea ceremony. He presented himself just this way at the time of the duel. His opponent observed the tea master's demeanor and withdrew his challenge.

So, approach #2, if too strong, can work against you. As you related, it can encourage opposition, making the job harder. It can also interfere with approach #1 causing loss of the finer aspects of physical control. IMO, some measure of spirit is needed, but only to facilitate one's skill. Ideally, I think the spirit should invigorate the body but calm the mind. Approach #3 is not my go to fighting style, but one I'd use for a particular opponent or situation.
 
I think it’s well documented that people, walking about their business, striding with purpose, looking confident and standing tall are less likely to be attack/mugged.

In Japanese Budo there is the concept known as kigurai (気位) which means an honourable dignity, commanding presence and implies a high level of inner strength, confidence and bearing. But it can also mean haughtiness or arrogance in everyday use; it’s a fine line that a good Budoka should take care not to cross.
 
three-cats.jpg

Question:
Would you say your own training today reflects one of these cats, a combination of them, or something else entirely?

Nice painting. So as it turns out, Issai Chōzan (the author of this parable) was not a Zen monk, but a Confucian-educated martial intellectual influenced by Yagyū Shinkage-ryū–style sword philosophy. By Chōzan’s time, Confucian learning was transmitted through domain schools, private academies, and martial lineages. During this time, Zhu Xi's four books were required reading for all three types of learning. In Japan the way this was applied practically deviated in many ways from pure Zhu Xi martial confucianism and more towards what you might call "Samurai Confucianism". So, knowing this, we can understand why an explanation of a koan will be a historical case that is not explained properly. It's not really a koan, it's improper lineage/teaching and it becomes a koan. Let us pray.

The original Japanese is closer to (not my translation):

“Those who rely on technique are bound by technique.
Those who rely on spirit are bound by spirit.
Those who rely on strategy are bound by strategy.

As long as there is a mind that tries to win, there is something for the opponent to oppose.”

This is a very daoist wei-wu-wei influence -- while not being actually daoist -- more of an observation about his own experiences -- and therefore I would have to say that my training is primarily based on the old cat's wise words, but not from experience and not from the same source, but from daoism, buddhism and confucianism. However, it is the same thing because we are discussing something real -- a discovery about ourselves -- self-discovery, and not something abstract such as "two of those, three of these, four of that, five of this, six of that, the eight this," etc.

  • Intent creates opposition
  • Self-awareness creates tension
  • Mind precedes conflict

However, knowing why these things are true, it is difficult to explain the practical process by which they affect your actions.

All I would be able to say by way of explanation, is that "if you want to go and do something, just go and do it, and stop making plans".
Making plans in this case is anything, anything at all other than "doing it". So for example, if I asked you (if you were a new Taiji student) to demonstrate or explain peng to me, you would simply do it, whether or not you knew how to do it or what you were doing.

This is a special kind of thinking and learning, there's one thing I left out to keep the message short, but i've written about it before in posts that discuss wu de.

Perhaps a better example to use here is that if you experience pain and this makes you pause, then you have been distracted by your own plans (which are that you must deal with that pain). Ignoring the pain, pressing on, and not being distracted by it, is part of this. Which is why you so often see the old master pass his hand over a flame and not get hurt -- Well, frankly, I believe it hurts like hell, but he doesn't care because he is very focused. Therefore I do not advise you to put your hand over a fire ever, even to test your strength, because you will hurt your body. But, the principle is that you can get run through with a sword and still manage to kill your enemy before you die. This is a very honorable and important thing to do and makes you a better soldier.

One of the first Crazy 88 members to attack The Bride is Juri Manase. Manase is Sonny Chiba's daughter; Chiba appears earlier in the film as master sword craftsman Hattori Hanzo.
3623904-26.jpg


This character demonstrated the willingness to go through the pain to accomplish her goals.

However, Sofie Fatale did not, and that is why Bill killed her; she had no honor and was not a true warrior.

This was the moment Sofie Fatale could have killed Black Mamba. At the moment she struck with her sword, she was the most vulnerable, having committed to the attack. If, at this moment she had spun to attack, she would have accomplished her mission, but she did not, because she was paralyzed by fear and pain.

julie_dreyfus_kill_bill.jpg


Having said all that I am reminded why I have such trouble explaining it in words. That was a really crappy explanation, sorry.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top