Bob Hubbard said:
Recently, I've been seeing a resurgence in what can at best be called Nationalistic Pride, and at worse complete racial bigotry in several art discussions. The basic argument is that unless one is genetically of the race or a native of the culture or trains in the place of origin of an art, one can only hope to be a wannabe.
I find this idea rather, stupid, to be blunt.
While once can make the case that each art is originally designed for the physical attributes of a particular culture/ethnic group, the great majority of them are not so hard to tweak to fit a different physical frame.
I've seen comments like "Only Filipinos can excel at FMA", "Unless you train in Japan your karate will be subpar", "Only a Korean can do real TKD", etc. I see these as just as bigoted and stupid as "only a black can play basketball" or "only an Italian can make authentic pizza".
So....am I crazy?
Or can a tall white Polish kid from California really develop into a Kung Fu Grandmaster when he's 80?
********* WARNING WARNING *********
Bob,
I have a problem with these types of comments as those making them are being racist and do not even realize it most times. They are repeating what they have been trained too from their culture and or family or society.
Now, when someone like Don Roley (* Sorry Don, you make a good example here

*), makes comments like from his experience the best instructors are in Japan, this is different then saying one can only learn in Japan. One is giving their opinion based upon their experience and knowledge, the other is discriminating.
I have a simple test:
If a comment such as "No non-pinoy can learn the true art" (* Pinoy being a term in Tagalog used to describe someone from the Phillipine Islands, and usually male. *) I then substitute in the word "WHITE".
"No non-White can learn the true art". This will cause an up roar by just about everyone out there.
Case in point while attending the University Of Michigan - Flint, I was part of the Student Council and one fo the offices I held was Legal Affairs. Usually this just means make sure the council follows to rules and guidelines and also apparoves clubs constitutions and guards the students and the Student Government from basic leagl issues.
I refused to approve a club which was the National Association of Black Accountants aka NABA. This is a good organization and they try to promote awareness and help all minorities in a predominately White/Caucasion degree or job. So why would I refuse to approve their constitution.
The Constitution stated to be a member of the club one had to be Black or Hispanic and to be officer one had to be Black or Female.
I substituted White for the other races and it was obvious to many why I would not. But there were a few that did not want it to be open to all. There was already an Accounting Club on Campus that was associated with a Frat and they were predominately White. So I could see the need, and I could also see that most of them would not go join their club, so having it on paper that any student can be a member (* which is a requirement of any club at the U of Mich *), would not be a real problem.
So the few who did not wish to change it, got upset and submitted ti again with no changes. I refused and I also refused a third time. The Second time I provided examples. In the third I wrote it for them and asked them if they woudl present it. Nope they insisted on having it their way. So after the third refual no more for that semester and also time had passed as well. So they went and talked to all the Minority staff including the Minority Affiars department. They attended the next council meeting to address my discrimination against them. I had large groups of African-Americans who were calling me names and threatening me and also causing problems if I was in the same class with them. All they were told was that I was being racist and discriminating against them.
So when the all the major players of the University showed up early and I was there, I invited them to join us at the Table, instead of sitting off to the side. Most of them knew me and those that did not were like cool this guy is fine and willing to work with us. When president came in to call the meeting to order, I motioned to move directly to this issue so we could address is early as opposed to the end of the meeting. It was approved. Then the spokeman asked who the RACIST of council was who refused to approve a club for Blacks.
I replied I refused to approve but I am not racist. I then asked for a moment of their time. I then read the clubs constitution out loud and replaced Minorities with White and Female with Male. I then asked them if that was a racist constitution and should be denied? They all agreed it should. I then re-read the constitution as written and asked if it was Racists. The answer was Yes. They were very upset for being dragged in to this type of issue. They then asked me if I would be willing to approve a new constitution. I said the by-laws do not allow it. I would need approval from the Chancellor and for the monies associated to it. The Minority Affairs chair said he would approach the Chancellor on the issue. I then pulled out the one I wrote for them which was theirs only removal of the racists comments and the comment that any current student maybe a member of the club.
I then asked those present if they would then consider my one request. That those involved would apologize to me, and that they could not be an officer for the first semster as their leadership skills were already in question the new club needed good leadership. They agreed, but those who had refused to change it originally, had left the meeting without apology. I told the Minority Affairs Chair to just let me know what the Chancellor decided and I would approve it get them going.
It was approved and the new officers apologized for not understanding my original concerns as the original offenders had refused to join the club if they could not be the officers, as they were soon to graduate.
All ended up well.
But Racism and or National Pride or what ever one wishes to call it, may be acceptable in other countries, but really is not acceptable in general public here in the States. Yes it exists, but they still wear masks and or say it in their homes or back fields, it is not institutionalized.
So by people continuing to propogate these comments it is just like those comments about African-Americans who were told they could never be smart enough to read or write because of their skin color.
********* WARNING WARNING *********
But that is just my opinion and thoughts on this issue.
PS: I am American Mute, with American Indian enough to have faced Racism and still face it today. Including going for an interview and not checking race for it was optional. The HR person told me I had too as they were a Governement contractor. I could refuse but then they could not hire me. So, I checked Caucasion, and when he read he held it out and said, "Are you sure?" - The issue is the Ameican Indian is far enough back I do not qualify legally nor do I have tribal sponsorship, nor can I get it, as my Grandmother burned the paperwork when she got it years ago. She thought it was for the best. I hope others do not have to feel it is for the best to deny their heritage.