Meteor Defense

jks9199

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
23,514
Reaction score
3,854
Location
Northern VA
Neat article, with a nifty and simple idea...

Gravity tractors.

Wired’s Spencer Ackerman explains that “all the advanced air defenses that humanity has invested in” are “useless, useless” against meteorites. The really dangerous space debris, like the Tunguska object, are too heavy and move way too quickly to be simply shot down. Hitting a giant meteor with a missile is only going to change its trajectory or shatter it into pieces, which could make it even more dangerous. “Now you’ve got a shotgun blast instead of a single shot,” a former U.S. Air Force Space Command office tells Ackerman.



Fortunately, there is an idea for a defense – an idea that Ackerman called a “gravity tractor” and has been around for at least a few years under similar names.
 

Dirty Dog

MT Senior Moderator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
23,440
Reaction score
9,221
Location
Pueblo West, CO
Actually, I'd think breaking a large body up into lots of small ones would be a good thing. A shotgun blast at cometary speeds is no big deal, since all the little pieces will burn up in the atmosphere. A single slug, however, has the potential to reach the ground. Think this:

View attachment $Crater.jpg

Which is believed to have been caused by a 50m meteor. Imagine if it had been 100m...
 

Tgace

Grandmaster
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
409
Lets just outlaw meteor strikes.
 

arnisador

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 28, 2001
Messages
44,573
Reaction score
456
Location
Terre Haute, IN
I'd also think many smaller ones would be much better than one large one, but it's far from clear that you'd break it up like that with a missile strike.
 

Dirty Dog

MT Senior Moderator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
23,440
Reaction score
9,221
Location
Pueblo West, CO
I'd also think many smaller ones would be much better than one large one, but it's far from clear that you'd break it up like that with a missile strike.

I belive (someone can certainly correct me if I'm wrong) that impact is non-linear. So two 50m rocks @ 30,000MPH is better than one 100m rock @ 30,000MPH.
 

arnisador

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 28, 2001
Messages
44,573
Reaction score
456
Location
Terre Haute, IN
Friction gets more of them when there's more surface area--just like a block of ice melts faster if you break it up into a few smaller pieces. That's what I was primarily thinking.
 
OP
J

jks9199

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
23,514
Reaction score
3,854
Location
Northern VA
I think the idea is that for the smaller big stuff -- getting hit by none is better than getting either a shotgun blast or a single hit. If a gravity tractor, as described, is enough to pull that stuff just far enough off track to miss...

There's not a handy solution around for the really big stuff... or even the ordinary big stuff.
 

Latest Discussions

Top