Hello,
I can appreciate any skepticism. I was a particpant in the original e-budo discussion s few years ago. I am a student of telecino/Francois Lepine/Maha Vajra.
Let me give my review on the Kuji system that he teaches.
I've done a variety of things in the past. Yoga, qigong, meditation, in various styles, and with different teachers.
My interest in Kuji in/Kiri derived from the old Stephan Hayes books. Eventually I found my way to Maha's door a number of years ago. I began my study with a great deal of vigor, and during this time, moments of spiritual revelation arrived with more frequency than at other times in my study.
However, after participating in that discussion in e-budo, and a few other related events at about that same time. I again went on my own to study various things elsewhere. While on my spiritual journey away from him, I've had a number of wonderful experience.
Then some time later, something interested me to start the Kuji In again.
Once more, it wasn't long for times of spiritual revelation to exceed my previous studies.
I've decided to include the methods he teaches as a regular part of my spiritual processes. A fairly large part.
Much of the criticisms on his Kuji-In technique came from when he had a tiny portion posted of what he taught. When he eventually posted the full technique, his staunchest detractor on e-budo said "He must have needed time to learn the material" and did not argue with the substance of what he taught.
The second point of detraction came from his study with Penny, and at the time it did not appear he had any other teachers. Upon acquiring priesthood in his Buddhist lineage(which his detractors do not recognize as one of their organizations)he listed those credentials as well.
In times when I had financial trouble and wanted to continue to learn, he did not charge me for books, and even gave me money to buy headphones so that we could have a video conference to discuss his teachings I have never been asked to repay him in any way, and I did not have to render and sort of service to him for the help he gave me, and continued to give me free of charge. Even when I would not talk to him for months and months at a time, I simply needed to send him a question, and he'd respond rapidly, without mentioning a fee, or any such issue.
I'm not interested in attempting to convince anyone of my primary teacher, or his methods. I just wanted to write a positive review because of all the bad press he got, from people who did not wish to look at all he was teaching when it was offered.
I apologize for ressurecting a dead thread.
Shawn Zemba