I think he was very open minded & there for looked at other systems to utilize what worked for him. Sure now people do this but i think in his time systems were much more rigid.
i think people have been doing that since the begining, thats clearly how all system developed
yes very true(Ed Parker was a good example) but i think he even looked at Fencing to use in his system so i think he was a special guy. very deep. End of the Day apples & oranges mate. If he was not so talented why would people like steve McQueen train with him or other hollywood greats at that time?
famous people like other famous people, they even tend to marry them,
the bullworker was and is marvelous, just very exspensive, you can make your own dynamic tension device for nothing, but no wall chart
Depends on the individuell. like i wrote apples & oranges. what tastes better?
Charles Atlas courses never used a bullworker. It was Dynamic(isomentric) tension. The Bullworker was more Isotonic(movement) & isometric(static) as i remember.
how do you know he never use it ? ive seen pictures of him using it!
he never sold it with his courses. If he used an early version of it i do not know. Even Joe weider sold devices as did Reg park from Leeds. expanders and other things. goes back to the old strong men I suggest you look at this guys channel too.
ive seen pictures if him using one,, he may have only used it just for the picture , but he still use it
maybe you are correct. not saying you´re wrong but his course i saw as my older brother had it.
well yes it has an element of both, which makes it superior to a fixed device,
