OkinawaPeichin
Yellow Belt
There will be lots who claim to be in Mr.Oyatas association and those who will actually be representing the art the man brought to ..basically the world. Anyone who uses the terminology Kyusho or Tuite owes that to Taika Oyata.
Who makes the better representation: the man who has all the patchs, certificates and logos saying "I am in Taika Oyata's Association, and I represent him and his style and no one who isn't wearing this doesn't" or the man who practises everyday and lives the Dojo Kun and Guiding Principles, who isn't with the assocaiton anymore but continues on the beaten path regardless?
This isn't aimed at anyone inparticular, however which is the better representation of Oyata Sensei's teaching?
As for Shintaku Sensei and his own 'art'... it is what it is. He decided to do his own thing. I am really not sure where he got his titles from, not sure why he decided to start doing what he is doing. It doesn't really look like he is teaching Oyata Sensei's art anymore, leaning more towards post ww2 aikido and goju-ryu. I have heard he is/was a very talented student, but I have never met him, never felt any of his techniques. I would not speak badly about anyones skill until I have seen what they can do.
As for the departure of both him and Mr.Amor from the Ryu-te Renmei, that seems to be purely political. Again it is between Oyata Sensei and those two individuals, and quite frankly people don't get spoken of well in Associations they were formly apart of. Again I do not believe there is any ill will towards the Ryu-te Renmei in Mr.Amor's association.
In response to your 1st paragraph:
Just because a lot of people do it doesn't make it right.
In response to your 2nd and 3rd paragraphs:
People that have been expelled from his association weren't done so
lightly or on a whim. It takes something pretty serious to be expelled
from Mr. Oyata's Org. The reason they were forced to leave was they
had extremely bad behavior and weren't following the Dojo Kun and
Guiding Principles among other things.
If it isn't aimed at anyone in particular then why mention it? But in
response to your "hypothetical" question. Which is better
representation of Mr. Oyata's art? A. The person who follows his way
of training and still actively trains with him, follows the Guiding
Principles & Dojo Kun, has "all the patches", (RyuTe Renmei has only 1
Assoc. patch by the way) AND the legal documentation to represent Mr.
Oyata's style? OR B. Someone that used to be a student of his and got
kicked out because of bad behavior and obviously wasn't following the
Dojo Kun and Guiding Principles, and is no longer allowed to actively
train with Mr. Oyata?
The correct answer is pretty simple I should think.
(The reason the legal documentation is now required to represent Mr.
Oyata's art is because of people (thieves) claiming they are or were
his students but have no authorization from him to teach. Some people
have used his name in order to make money and recruit students. Only
people that have trained with him and tested to a certain rank are
asked to represent him and given a license to teach and represent his
association. We have Mr. Dillman and a few others to thank for this
now necessary paperwork.)
In response to your last paragraph:
You say Mr. Amor's departure was "political". This would tend to lead
people to think they had a disagreement over a particular point of
view based on their opinions. This was not the reason for Mr. Amor's
expulsion. He was asked to leave because of his poor conduct, not
because he and Mr. Oyata disagreed on something.