Really? You directly misrepresented Ohio law when you wrote, "
You can't even use the word "free" freely, in OH, in commercial advertising, without potentially violating the law." What you are implying there is patently untrue. Advertisers
can, in fact, use the word "free" it just has to be, you know, actually free; and it's write there in the law you referenced where, in ORC, it says,
"It is the express intent of this rule to prohibit the practice of advertising or offering goods or services as "free" when in fact the cost of the "free" offer is passed on to the consumer by raising the regular (base) price of the goods or services that must be purchased in connection with the "free" offer."
The only question is, did you deliberately misrepresent ORC by specifically neglecting to include what it said in order to try to score points or, instead, were you just lazy and didn't read the law in your haste to try to get a 'gotcha' moment? Which was it, A or B?