Originally posted by Icepick
I've been reading Matt Thornton's stuff again, particularly about Alive training vs. Dead (pre-programmed) drills. While I agree that it is important not to fall into the trap of becoming a "drill master", unable to deal with someone not familiar with the drill, but aren't there some advantages to traditional FMA drills?
Do you guys teach sumbrada, sinawali or the like? What skills do you feel these develop?
In my opinion being a drill master is okay as long as you take that drill and break it down to see where the combat attributes are inside the drill.
Drills should be done in a progressive manner. First the drill is learned and practiced at slow speed, then moved into a medium speed. At this medium speed level, techniques should be incorporated into the drill. Once this has been practiced and the moves are fluent then increase the speed of the drill as well as changing the range of the drill.
For ex: Drills such as 5 count and 10 count (names are different in different schools) should be done at combat speed and should be practice with a consistant rhythm and then practice with a broken beat as to counteract any predictability.
Another example: When practicing sinawalis the same progression should take place, get the rhythm down, and increase speed and take techniques from the sinawalis. Or use the practicing of the sinawali, as a chancs to practice half beats. Single sinawali is awesome for this.
Another example: While doing heaven have one guy defend against it with just a single stick and then go back into to the heaven drill without breaking beat......
Drills have there place in training. They help with timing, breaking of timing, reference points and the biggest benefit they help develop line familiarization.
Drills should only be part of the whole. They need to be balanced with sparring, or "live training"
Just my two and half cents..........
Thanks
Bob