Sinawalis--How Many is Enough?

arnisador

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 28, 2001
Messages
44,573
Reaction score
456
Location
Terre Haute, IN
We had a discussion on FMATalk recently about sinawalis that was interesting. I thought I'd repost the first post from that thread here to try to get more opinions:

As some of you know, I'm spending a year in Albuquerque, NM for work. I'm visiting some martial arts schools to find somepleace for my son and I to practice while we're here. (We also train on our own.) There is some FMA here, though not as much as I'd hoped to find!

We've been visiting a school where during the FMA class we do a lot of sinawalis. Every class seems to have a different one. Sometimes they're so very close to one I know well that it's hard to break out of that old pattern. Other times they're very different. But at each class it seems there's at least one new one.

I've wondered this before: How many sinawalis is enough--or even too many? In Modern Arnis under Prof. Presas we typically did single sinawali (high R forehand, low R backhand, high L forehand, low L backhand, repeat), double sinawali (heaven-and-earth), and reverse sinawali (earth six), and sometimes heaven six (a.k.a. redondo). These are relatively simple sinawalis compared to some of the ten-count, asymmetric routines I've done in other systems.

Part of me says, If it's new to you or hard for you to do then you're learning something; but part of me says, What's the marginal value of learning one more double-stick pattern?

Some of them work in abaniqo strikes, which aren't explicitly in the Modern Arnis sinawalis, and I see some value to that. We did one the other night using a reverse-grip on the stick, which was different. But some others work me into arms-crossed positions that I find awkward! I certainly wouldn't want to be in some of these positions, but one can't always choose where one ends up, I suppose.

Sometimes I've felt that an instructor has found doing many sinawalis a convenient way to pass the class time. Rarely has an instructor whose class I've visited followed up a sinawali by saying "Now here's how you'd use this one... (or why this one is important)" though of course that does sometimes happen. To me the biggest value has always been the ambidexterity it develops, as well as there being some value to having an ingrained double-stick striking pattern to fall back on if need be.

Is there great value in knowing many sinawalis, or is it enough to have a few? Should you be sure to learn a new one every now and again just to shake yourself up? For people who "collect" sinawalis--why?
 

arnisandyz

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 22, 2002
Messages
1,346
Reaction score
37
Location
Melbourne, Florida
For me its to learn different movements your hands can do from different positions. You mentioned 'shaking things up". Thats a good way of looking at it. When we first learn a siniwali we paint by numbers and memorize a pattern. If you only know one or two patterns your body won't know what to do if it finds itself out of position or sequence. These are the people that when you break out of the pattern stop and say 'thats not how the pattern goes". Sometimes i'll "mess up' on purpose to see if my partner can pick it up, adapt, and keep the movement going. Each siniwali is, in itself a memorized pattern, but when used together they help break the patterns and develop a freeflow. its like a math formula. If I know A and I know B i can figure out C for myself.
 

kroh

Brown Belt
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
403
Reaction score
8
Location
Rhode Island, USA
I would tend to think that each pattern should represent some different aspect of sinawali tactics. Just having more patterns that teach the same thing tends to be confusing on a basic level and tedious on an advanced level (There are some Kenpo systems that teach like this and I know a few pratcitioners who are in the closet about being bored out of their minds at the higher levels. They know and are forced to learn hundreds of techniques that teach ten principles.). There are some of the heaven and earth patterns that teach the basics of the movements and then those that interject new movements to change the nature of the movement. If the moves are the same why do you need more patterns? But that is just my take on it.

I guess it's all good if you are getting off the couch...:idunno:

Regards,
Walt
 

ryangruhn

Orange Belt
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Breaking patterns is one of the most important concepts in martial arts. We recently started in on a new pattern that was rather easy and the new guys picked it up fairly quickly. The elders on the other hand had a heck of a time doing it because it went against all the patterns that they were taught in the past. If you ask me, any and all martial artists that are set in patterns are subject to weakness somewhere in their game. As mentioned above, the ultimate goal should be free flow.

Gruhn
 

GuruJim1

Green Belt
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
Location
Kansas
I try to keep my Sinawalis simple. I teach my students the basic Heaven, Heaven & Earth, and Earth Six count drills. After they master those drills I tell my students to mix the drills up such as:

H=High
L=Low

Heaven Six:
HHH-HHH

Heaven & Earth Six:
HLH-HLH

Earth Six:
LLL-LLL

Now, after they understand these drills then they make there own up for example:

LLH-HHL HHH-LLL LHL-LHH.... And so on. Now after they learn how to do this with the 64 possible drill that this can produce I have them add in blocks, for example:

Heaven Six:
Your right does a #1 Strike and goes right into an umbrella. Left hand does a #1 strike. Then your Right comes out of the umbrella and does a #1 Strike. Repeat on the other side.

This goes on using strike and blocks in the Sinawalis. The whole point is to get the student to free flow and make up their own patterns using all the drills that I taught them. I do use 8 count Sinawalis but anything higher than that I personal don't see the point. Teaching a lot of ways to do drill can be fun for the student, but don't make the student rely on you for more patterns.

My teachers has always said, "I can teach you drills, forms, and other set patterns, but if you can develop your own from what I have taught you. That's when you really know how to use this system." I truly believe that and I teach by that method. Well, that was my two cent.
 

ryangruhn

Orange Belt
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
64 possibilities of “meeting the force” and LRL-RLR patters. You can then take it even further and add passive strikes and different patterns of right and left hand. After this you can then vary it by witik, loptik or radondo. This can then be taken even further and be incorporated into sombrada patterns.

Fun Stuff,


Gruhn
 

GuruJim1

Green Belt
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
Location
Kansas
ryangruhn said:
64 possibilities of “meeting the force” and LRL-RLR patters. You can then take it even further and add passive strikes and different patterns of right and left hand. After this you can then vary it by witik, loptik or radondo. This can then be taken even further and be incorporated into sombrada patterns.

Fun Stuff,


Gruhn

Very true, I just used only a couple of examples. The drills that could come from all these drills are endless, and not just 64. The 64 possibilities are only from the basic six count drills (Force Meeting Force).

The point is to teach the concept of these drills, so that the student is not relying on the instructor to spoon feed them these patterns. The student should be able to discover their own drills free from the instructor.

Gruhn thanks for the input, as you know it's hard to sit down and write every possiblities that these drills can produce. This is why I love this stuff, a lot of fun for everyone. Except for the person getting hit though...LOL:jedi1:
 

kroh

Brown Belt
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
403
Reaction score
8
Location
Rhode Island, USA
The point is to teach the concept of these drills, so that the student is not relying on the instructor to spoon feed them these patterns. The student should be able to discover their own drills free from the instructor.

Sing it on the Mountain!
Regards,
Walt
 

Mark Lynn

Master Black Belt
Joined
Apr 21, 2003
Messages
1,345
Reaction score
184
Location
Roanoke TX USA
I believe that some application needs to be taught as well. Here are some examples.

You have the patterns that you practice with a partner for flow then you can do the following with them.
1) String patterns togethers,
Heaven, Standard, Earth Six count
Heaven, double up on side strikes, and earth then double up on side strikes then back to Heaven again (makes a box shape).
Start with an open pattern and go into a closed pattern and back again. Like adding a prefix or suffix to a drill.
2) Add in different types of movements, moving in circles, back and forth etc.
3) Different heights one person standing and one on the floor, or one on a higher elevation and one on a lower elevation.
4) Have three man drills, have people in a triangle and one person do a set and then switch to the other person etc. etc.

Or use the parterns in a more of combative application
1) Feed a technique and have the defensive person flow into a Sinawali response.
2) Add in different foot work. As person feeds, Zone to the outside and move past the person while striking them with the chosen Sinawali response.
3) Have three men in a line one person engages the other one and they defend getting past them and engaing the person behind them.

I need to go
mark

 

Lobo

Yellow Belt
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Well, I'm in no position to even give advice, but from what I've researched, I believe, as a beginner, that Sinawalis are very useful. They help you lose hesitation, and amplify confidence, thus helping you to attack more naturally (which is kinda scary if you ask me. I mean, think about it, eventually, down the road killing someone would be completely natural. Well, at least thats how it was with my friend learning Krav Maga. He's trained to kill if neccessary.). From what I've seen, the flow helps catch the opponent off guard, similar to capoeira. I like FMA's, their elegant, useful, and effective. A perfect art for me.
 

Latest Discussions

Top