zijin_cheng
Yellow Belt
I'm still not getting the answer Im looking for, but maybe that's just me being a noob, I'm not even sure what to do now. I guess ill just ask my WC
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As far as practice a short hand structure versus a long hand structure... they are different. Both are CMA, but are totally different. Is a circle detrimental to a square? No... they're different. You train in one, the other will feel different. You train one long enough & deep enough, the other will be totally new when picked up & kept easily apart. Don't try to blend them. Focus on what you have (coached WC). Put the other on a shelf until you can get to a teacher.
As I read this, you're practicing some forms you learned a while ago, to keep them in memory and for exercise. But you don't have ongoing guidance and correction in them, and you're having problems with bleed over from your TKD practice when you were a kid. Meanwhile -- you've got someone teaching you wing chun.
You seem like you're trying to blend all of these things together, and, not surprisingly, it's not working well. Each has different underlying principles. Put the majority of your practice in the wing chun; you've got a teacher who can correct and guide you. Practice the rest occasionally, once or maybe twice a week, mostly to keep the forms in your memory for when you get back to training in them.
Oh ok now it makes sense.
Last question, promise, I stretch and do TKD kicks mainly for fun and keep my flexibility.
Will this distract from WC training?
Didn't I say exactly that??
Man... I need to work on communication skills better...
Doing a style like TKD doesn't necessarily mean you're going to be stiff. As was said previously, some styles mind less that others. I come from a Kyokushin Karate background, and in my experience there are a lot of stiff people from TKD, Karate, Muay Thai, etc. But the best always learn a significant degree of relaxation in their movement and power expression, it comes with understanding economy of motion and where actual power comes from (maybe not as much a some TCMA ask of you, but a good amount). If you are really stiff, IMHO opinion, you just haven't stuck with anything long enough, under a qualified teacher to understand why doing anything that way is more detrimental that beneficial. If all of your TKD kicks are really stiff, then your mechanics are flawed. You should be able to do them without a ton of tension. If you can't, then you need to do more, but again, under a qualified instructor that can refine the flaws in your technique. Power and speed come from technique and relaxed movement, not tension, and a good instructor can show you that.
I learned TKD until brown belt when I was 11 and stopped. In grade 10 i started Chinese martial arts.
After about 2 years many of my friends had graceful movements when doing forms, while I didn't and still looked like a block when doing them.
(This place I went to emphasized more on beauty than usefulness, they had wing chun for usefullness)
Although I was unmatched in kicking power, no matter how hard I tried, I couldn't be graceful, is it because TKDs movements are very powerful but stiff?
Cool, which Chinese Martial arts? How old are you now?
This is a very standard product of TKD, and many Karate systems for that matter. But, at this point, it's what's functional, not what's graceful that counts!
Modern "Wushu" is typically focused on form over function. WC is quite the opposite.
If you were unmatched in kicking power, then clearly what you were doing is more function that this Wushu place. Grace be damned, if your faster, deliver more power pound for pound, and have better movement / methods then that is what matters.
My advice; There are exceptions, but at large the TKD system is a sport. It can be stiff, particularly the upper body. The mechanics will be contraindicated with those of Kung-fu for the most part, but if the kung fu is not functional, I'd stick with the TKD if you never want to go the functional-fu route, TKD can be fun otherwise.
G
Oh additional question, correct me where I'm wrong, but I find TKD, karate, MT etc all employ telegraphic movements to gain power, and hypothetically if a TKD went up against a WC guy of the same "skill level", would you say the WC guy would gain the element of surprise for at least a second or two because an experienced TKD/karate dude would rely on telegraphic movement to be able to effectively block/dodge, whereas a WC can just hit you with enough power without a large swing?
I would disagree with this. TKD, Karate, MT and pretty much all martial arts (that I am familiar with, anyway) train to develop non-telegraphic techniques. This isn't exclusive to Wing Chun. When I studied TKD years ago, we definitely worked to avoid telegraphing. Same with boxing; telegraphing your punches there could be a quick way to end the fight (but not the way you want it to end).
If you were to go up against an experienced TKD/Karate/MT/etc guy and expect him to be telegraphing his movements, you might be in for a surprise.
There are no pre movements in Wing Chun , and the striking is so directly aimed at the opponent that it makes it hard for the human eye to detect.
The stance or posture in Wing Chun is integral to non telegraphic movement.
With the body square on and the feet equidistant to the opponent , either side of the body has equal opportunity to strike the opponent , this adds a factor of unpredictability.
In comparison with a side on body structure , the lead leg and hand are the most dangerous to you because they are closest , the rear hand and leg although they will deliver a more powerful blow have a greater distance to travel and are more at risk of being countered.