I wish people wouldn't put weapons on display they don't know how to use.
"Know how to use" is a pretty broad phrase.
It seems... petty for an art.
It can be argued that
all art is "petty." There's always someone that objects to the "art." Maybe it's offensive ("Piss Christ" anyone?), gauche, misunderstood, too expensive, the viewer disagrees with the "statement" being made, it glorifies something the viewer disagrees with or feels is offensive or unworthy (99% of Soviet public statuary, for instance), or any of a thousand different things. At its most basic, art is meant to entertain and be a creative expression of the artist and the decorator selecting the art.
Though I understand art is meant to be seen, a sword was not meant to lie still.
Historically, there's a metric crap-ton of examples of non-functional "art" and/or display weaponry. There are loads of examples of captured "trophy" swords dating back to God-knows-when. Who hasn't seen a set of military sabers crossed over a manor fireplace? Castles are always littered with suits of armour and other displays, right? It used to be dirt common to make decorative "Presentation Swords" which commemorated some important event for the receiver (battle won, heroic activity, etc.). There are lots of examples of purely ceremonial swords. The Chicago museum's militaria room has some 12" swords that could never be used and were only intended to be carried in special parades and be put on display all other times. And, of course, every branch of the U.S. Military still has their own, completely non-functional, dress swords.
Nah. Nothing wrong with "art" swords at all and they've got a
really long history. I don't particularly care for most of the Fantasy style wall-hangers. I just hate the completely non-functional, counter-useful, often dangerous to the user, designs and shapes. But that's just me. There's plenty of historic precedent for them.
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk