How do you know? You admitted yourself that you didn't read it, so you have no idea what the selection criteria or methodology was. There are also other studies that show a range of heritabilities of homosexuality. Did you bother searching for them? If you have no problem with gays, why are you so eager to instantly dismiss the evidence out there without even looking at it first?
Here is where you show your ignorance of genetics. There is no single "gay gene", that's been obvious for a long time, since homosexuals and their offspring do not display simple Mendelian inheritance.
That doesn't mean it isn't genetic though. There is no single "hair color gene" either - do you deny that hair color is genetically determined? Do the terms "incomplete penetrance" or "blended inheritance" mean anything to you? If not, you have no idea what you are even asking for.
haha I did vote against homosexual marriage here in California, but then again I think marriage period is to easy, to lightly taken, and I think the vast majority of people getting married shouldnt be getting married as it is... If I had my way government would be out of the marriage business all together, if there was a vote for removing the two I would vote for it, the fact remains until they say WHAM here is the gay gene..... there will not be proof. the study you gave is not proof, its a trend based on who they picked. Too many factors could invalidate such a small study. Like I said even you can easily pick it apart, you just choose not to, and I did not have to read about it to make that comment... show me the gay gene... thats what its going to take to prove it to America../shrug until then its a lifestyle choice in our country as much as you, me, or anyone else may agree or disagree about it.
