Yama Arashi
White Belt
First and foremost I am not a member of the Bujinkan or Genbukan. I have however done more than my fair share of research into the art of Ninjutsu and taijutsu. I, by no means consider myself and expert of the subject of this art. I've already read most of your arguements about sparring and live training so don't bother reposting them. I just can't sit idly by anymore and listen to this nonsense. Please, just hear what I have to say and decide later. Some might be enlightened and some will never learn. This might be rubbish or gold. Take it for what it's worth to you.
As long as I can remember I have had an obsession with the whole ninja thing. As I grew older I took to the books to discover what the "real" ninjutsu thing was about. I became genuinely interest and vowed to one day study the art. I come from a small town and an not even close so that option is closed.
Being that the Bujinkan is the more popular X-kan I order Hatsumi videos and books and buried myself in them. The more I read and saw the more I liked it.
Then about 1 year ago I became totally [FONT="]disallusioned with the whole idea of Bujinkan training.Thoughts started rushing in my head. Wait this isn't ninjutsu! It's the fighting element Taijutsu! That's why the diplomas say Budo Taijutsu not ninjutsu now. Okay, I could deal with that, cool, cool, ninjutsu isn't needed now anyway. What do I want to be a spy, no. That's silly. We're not in pretend land. Then came the "we don't spar, it makes you a bad fighter". Okay I understand it's not a sport but how do you teach alive training without going full speed or having a fully resisting Uke? So fighting doesn't make you a better fighter? I'm confused, training how to drive is not the same as driving. Real experience is key. Then what totally blew my mind is watching my Tai Kai videos. The students in Japan just watched Hatsumi perform and then tried to replicate it, terribly I might add, and then on to the next lesson. Where's the repeditive action and then full speed application. I am in Judo/Jujutsu (becaue that is all that is offered in my small town - that or Tae Kwon Do - easy choice there) and I learn trhrows that look sweet. Problem is I try them in a match and they don't work for me, why? Because they simply don't work for me, not at full speed anyway. How did I learn that these techniques were bad for me?. I tried using them "live". They worked fine in practice with a uke. If I had never tried using the tech in randori I would have a false confidence that it would work for me. Now comparing Judo to Taijutsu is apples and oranges but the concepts are still there.
Here is another point I would like to make. Toshitsugu Takamatsu did live sparring and he thought it was important. If he didn't why did he travel to China and fight tons of people to prove his art was superior. He was a great fighter cause he FOUGHT! He even killed people in matches. Now he chose to fight without , which is something I think some of you need to consider. He didn't always use death blows to win, he competed in friendly sparring. I guess according to some sparring makes your taijutsu worse. I guess Takamatsu had bad taijutsu then? No, it made his BETTER! Does anyone remember this from his history? It should be noted that he does not talk about toughness, the ability to hurt people, or the thrill of conquering others in order to make oneself more important. Please don't write back saying he already proved the techniques so I don't have to. Just because your art contains a great fighter doesn't not make you one. Why have you strayed so far from the Takamatsu teachings, Hatsumi? I understand he is Soke, but this budo has become a former shadow (not in a good ninja sense either) of what it used to be.
Sorry if I have offended anyone. I want to learn Taijusu but fear that without proper aliveness it will be worthless. Is the Bujinkan for me or should I look into Genbukan? I heard those guys train full on. Plus after research I feel Shoto Tanemura is perserving Takamatsu's art better than Hatsumi is. That is my opinion, I will respect yours. Thank you for reading my post I have tried to be respectable as possible. Please forgive any offenses.
[/FONT]
As long as I can remember I have had an obsession with the whole ninja thing. As I grew older I took to the books to discover what the "real" ninjutsu thing was about. I became genuinely interest and vowed to one day study the art. I come from a small town and an not even close so that option is closed.
Being that the Bujinkan is the more popular X-kan I order Hatsumi videos and books and buried myself in them. The more I read and saw the more I liked it.
Then about 1 year ago I became totally [FONT="]disallusioned with the whole idea of Bujinkan training.Thoughts started rushing in my head. Wait this isn't ninjutsu! It's the fighting element Taijutsu! That's why the diplomas say Budo Taijutsu not ninjutsu now. Okay, I could deal with that, cool, cool, ninjutsu isn't needed now anyway. What do I want to be a spy, no. That's silly. We're not in pretend land. Then came the "we don't spar, it makes you a bad fighter". Okay I understand it's not a sport but how do you teach alive training without going full speed or having a fully resisting Uke? So fighting doesn't make you a better fighter? I'm confused, training how to drive is not the same as driving. Real experience is key. Then what totally blew my mind is watching my Tai Kai videos. The students in Japan just watched Hatsumi perform and then tried to replicate it, terribly I might add, and then on to the next lesson. Where's the repeditive action and then full speed application. I am in Judo/Jujutsu (becaue that is all that is offered in my small town - that or Tae Kwon Do - easy choice there) and I learn trhrows that look sweet. Problem is I try them in a match and they don't work for me, why? Because they simply don't work for me, not at full speed anyway. How did I learn that these techniques were bad for me?. I tried using them "live". They worked fine in practice with a uke. If I had never tried using the tech in randori I would have a false confidence that it would work for me. Now comparing Judo to Taijutsu is apples and oranges but the concepts are still there.
Here is another point I would like to make. Toshitsugu Takamatsu did live sparring and he thought it was important. If he didn't why did he travel to China and fight tons of people to prove his art was superior. He was a great fighter cause he FOUGHT! He even killed people in matches. Now he chose to fight without , which is something I think some of you need to consider. He didn't always use death blows to win, he competed in friendly sparring. I guess according to some sparring makes your taijutsu worse. I guess Takamatsu had bad taijutsu then? No, it made his BETTER! Does anyone remember this from his history? It should be noted that he does not talk about toughness, the ability to hurt people, or the thrill of conquering others in order to make oneself more important. Please don't write back saying he already proved the techniques so I don't have to. Just because your art contains a great fighter doesn't not make you one. Why have you strayed so far from the Takamatsu teachings, Hatsumi? I understand he is Soke, but this budo has become a former shadow (not in a good ninja sense either) of what it used to be.
Sorry if I have offended anyone. I want to learn Taijusu but fear that without proper aliveness it will be worthless. Is the Bujinkan for me or should I look into Genbukan? I heard those guys train full on. Plus after research I feel Shoto Tanemura is perserving Takamatsu's art better than Hatsumi is. That is my opinion, I will respect yours. Thank you for reading my post I have tried to be respectable as possible. Please forgive any offenses.
[/FONT]