Are modern ninjutsu schools frauds?

Grimlon332

White Belt
Joined
Jul 1, 2019
Messages
9
Reaction score
3
Location
Paris, France
I was snooping around on the Internet, when I came across videos and articles about actual ninjutsu schools, like the Bunjinkan of Masaaki Hatsumi. I did some searches about what the shcool had to offer, and I was pretty excited to try my hand one day. But, I also found ton of videos or forum posts, who made harsh critics about ninjutsu teacher on the internet, mocking them and showing that they were fraud.

Now, I'm asking, are all the ninjutsu fraudulent like said in these videos or the reality is more shady?

Thanks a lot for your answer and have a good day!
 

drop bear

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
20,495
Reaction score
5,403
giphy.gif
 

Headhunter

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
4,765
Reaction score
1,587
Judge for yourself rather than listen to a bunch of strangers who've probably never trained a day in their lives
 
OP
Grimlon332

Grimlon332

White Belt
Joined
Jul 1, 2019
Messages
9
Reaction score
3
Location
Paris, France
Judge for yourself rather than listen to a bunch of strangers who've probably never trained a day in their lives

That's a good idea. I planned to do that this summer. And you, have you trained in Bujinkan for example?
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,495
Location
Manchester UK
I was snooping around on the Internet, when I came across videos and articles about actual ninjutsu schools, like the Bunjinkan of Masaaki Hatsumi. I did some searches about what the shcool had to offer, and I was pretty excited to try my hand one day. But, I also found ton of videos or forum posts, who made harsh critics about ninjutsu teacher on the internet, mocking them and showing that they were fraud.

Now, I'm asking, are all the ninjutsu fraudulent like said in these videos or the reality is more shady?

Thanks a lot for your answer and have a good day!
it rather depends on what you / they mean by fraud, that would required them to make claims/ give promises they knew to be untrue. if they are promising to turn you into a ninja killing machine, that might be crossing the line,

if its more a question of the efficacy of what they teach, then its slightly more subjective judgement, go with an open mind but a teaspoon of cynicism and see what you think

most of the traditional arts get a hard time on the internet, however some of them at some clubs are quite good ?,
 

Rat

Master of Arts
Joined
Jul 11, 2018
Messages
1,577
Reaction score
201
A storm is comin'?
Yes, run while you still can.


Now for a serious response, one that i probably should put in a diffrent post so people dont rate it funny for the joe above but what ever.


Im going to say most modern ninjitsu schools you can find have no relation to ninjitsu, you may be able to find a few people who have groups set up for living history to resurrect the skills they used to use and such. Kind of like how re enactment groups fight and live in the time frame they re enact for. and exist to portray it as accurately as possible and as reliably as possible.

As a modern combat system though i think its basically useless or you can get a better education in "ninja" skills if you try and get into the military or find a group which teaches realistic modern tactics. Or at least outside of the "martial arts school" category.

By that i mean, soldiers (obviously pending country, rank and job and climate as in war time, peacetime and where the war(s) are) Learn to fight with a rifle, go through aggression training, learn to live in the field, learn camouflage and concealment, can learn to stalk humans etc. If we break into special forces and unconventional fighting, lock picking, sabotage skills surveillance and hiding in populations is also included as well as potentially tracking along with other things. Much better than a jujitsu school can probably teach you and set in the modern world.

But as a disclaimer i haven't done it, some things may be applicable from it and there might be a few (and i mean that to be a very low number) good schools out there which might more or less do the non combative elements from ninjitsu but as a generalization, the above applies. Always keep a open mind and follow evidence if you do dealings with them though and always question the purpose for something and if its meant for combat want it pressure tested as best as possible. I would say do that for any martial art you undertake or any teacher you are learning a skill from.
 

Headhunter

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
4,765
Reaction score
1,587
Yes, run while you still can.


Now for a serious response, one that i probably should put in a diffrent post so people dont rate it funny for the joe above but what ever.


Im going to say most modern ninjitsu schools you can find have no relation to ninjitsu, you may be able to find a few people who have groups set up for living history to resurrect the skills they used to use and such. Kind of like how re enactment groups fight and live in the time frame they re enact for. and exist to portray it as accurately as possible and as reliably as possible.

As a modern combat system though i think its basically useless or you can get a better education in "ninja" skills if you try and get into the military or find a group which teaches realistic modern tactics. Or at least outside of the "martial arts school" category.

By that i mean, soldiers (obviously pending country, rank and job and climate as in war time, peacetime and where the war(s) are) Learn to fight with a rifle, go through aggression training, learn to live in the field, learn camouflage and concealment, can learn to stalk humans etc. If we break into special forces and unconventional fighting, lock picking, sabotage skills surveillance and hiding in populations is also included as well as potentially tracking along with other things. Much better than a jujitsu school can probably teach you and set in the modern world.

But as a disclaimer i haven't done it, some things may be applicable from it and there might be a few (and i mean that to be a very low number) good schools out there which might more or less do the non combative elements from ninjitsu but as a generalization, the above applies. Always keep a open mind and follow evidence if you do dealings with them though and always question the purpose for something and if its meant for combat want it pressure tested as best as possible. I would say do that for any martial art you undertake or any teacher you are learning a skill from.
Sorry but how can you claim what's useless and what's not when you don't train anything? Unless you've now started training
 

JR 137

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 26, 2015
Messages
5,162
Reaction score
3,214
Location
In the dojo
Sorry but how can you claim what's useless and what's not when you don't train anything? Unless you've now started training
He’s watched videos and heard people talk sh!t about it online. That’s sufficient research :D
 

Tony Dismukes

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
5,901
Reaction score
4,470
Location
Lexington, KY
But, I also found ton of videos or forum posts, who made harsh critics about ninjutsu teacher on the internet, mocking them and showing that they were fraud.

Now, I'm asking, are all the ninjutsu fraudulent like said in these videos or the reality is more shady?
I don't know what videos or forums you've been looking at, but I suspect you may be conflating some very different criticisms of different teachers.

One category of criticism is that someone is a literal fraud, meaning they are deliberately, knowingly deceiving students about the material they are teaching and their qualifications for teaching it. This would cover teachers who claim to have learned an actual historical Japanese lineage of an art practiced by the historical ninja directly from the last surviving member of a ninja family, when in reality they just made it all up based on a foundation of karate and inspiration from movies. (Since MartialTalk has a prohibition on fraudbusting, I will not be naming any names.) These individuals may or may not be competent martial artists or instructors, but they are frauds in that they are lying to their students.

The next category would be instructors who learned from the first category (deliberate fraud), but who believed what they were taught. These individuals may or may not be competent martial artists or instructors, but their art has no connection to historical ninjutsu. I would not call these teachers frauds, although they may be misguided.

The X-kan (Bujinkan and its offshoots) arts occupy an ambiguous place in relation to the categories above. The arts taught in the X-kan organizations include modern interpretations of genuine verifiable historical Japanese arts. However the verifiable arts are not ninjutsu and the ninjutsu arts are not currently verifiable as being genuine historical arts reaching back to the actual ninja. There are practitioners doing research in verifying such a connection, but it may never be proved one way or another. If the "ninjutsu" components of the X-Kans were created fraudulently, it would have been done over 60 years ago, by someone who at least had a solid foundation in historical Japanese arts and may have been attempting to recreate a ninjutsu system based on that knowledge. In any case, current practitioners of the X-Kan arts should not be regarded as frauds in the sense of deliberately misrepresenting themselves or the history of their art. (Unless you find an instructor who lies about his rank or training, but you can find that sort of thing in any art.)

The other sort of criticism you might encounter is the idea that the training in "ninjutsu" schools (Bujinkan or otherwise) is just not effective for the claimed purpose of combat or self-defense and that the instructors are "fraudulent" for claiming it is. Whatever the merits of such criticism, I would argue that "fraud" is the wrong word. Every "ninjutsu" instructor I have ever met or trained with has been genuinely confident in the value and effectiveness of what they are teaching. If they are wrong, it doesn't make them frauds, just misguided.

I should add that every single martial art on the face of the planet has detractors who will claim it is ineffective for self-defense. Until you have personal experience, you don't have a good basis for knowing which critiques have validity. I spent a number of years training in the Bujinkan before I went on to other arts. I have my own opinions and critiques of how they do things. However since you've never met me or trained with me, you have no way of knowing whether my opinions are worth anything or if they're a bunch of hot air. If you are interested in the Bujinkan and have a good school nearby, give it a try and judge for yourself. (I should warn you that the Bujinkan does have a well-deserved reputation for … inconsistency in quality control when awarding rankings. If the teacher you find has a high rank, they might be really good ,,, or pretty crappy … or somewhere in-between. Caveat emptor.)
 

drop bear

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
20,495
Reaction score
5,403
Sorry but how can you claim what's useless and what's not when you don't train anything? Unless you've now started training

The same way you can claim meth is bad without being a crack head.
 

drop bear

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
20,495
Reaction score
5,403
The way I look at the validity of a martial art is to see if they have evidence that they work.

Which brings us to the celestial tea cup.

 

dunc

Blue Belt
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
280
Reaction score
145
Pretty much what Tony says

The Bujinkan includes several arts that are relatively straightforward, well documented old styles of martial art
It also includes several styles that come from the Iga region which is famous for ninja
Until recently the transmission of these Iga styles was purely oral and thus unverifiable. Hence there’s a fair bit of conjecture and noise on the web about this

However, there has recently been some research into the stories and family ties around the Ira connection and there is now evidence that a) there is a direct family connection from the lord of a castle in Iga to the Bujinkan, b) the family were senior respected martial artists, c) they held positions in government traditionally associated with ninja, and d) they may have been tasked with some unusual jobs in times of trouble
 

Martial D

Senior Master
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
3,261
Reaction score
1,008
I was snooping around on the Internet, when I came across videos and articles about actual ninjutsu schools, like the Bunjinkan of Masaaki Hatsumi. I did some searches about what the shcool had to offer, and I was pretty excited to try my hand one day. But, I also found ton of videos or forum posts, who made harsh critics about ninjutsu teacher on the internet, mocking them and showing that they were fraud.

Now, I'm asking, are all the ninjutsu fraudulent like said in these videos or the reality is more shady?

Thanks a lot for your answer and have a good day!

Caveat Emptor
 

drop bear

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
20,495
Reaction score
5,403
Pretty much what Tony says

The Bujinkan includes several arts that are relatively straightforward, well documented old styles of martial art
It also includes several styles that come from the Iga region which is famous for ninja
Until recently the transmission of these Iga styles was purely oral and thus unverifiable. Hence there’s a fair bit of conjecture and noise on the web about this

However, there has recently been some research into the stories and family ties around the Ira connection and there is now evidence that a) there is a direct family connection from the lord of a castle in Iga to the Bujinkan, b) the family were senior respected martial artists, c) they held positions in government traditionally associated with ninja, and d) they may have been tasked with some unusual jobs in times of trouble


The other theory is it was just a special forces thing.

Just grab a bunch of soldiers to do some sneaky work. And congratulations you are Ninjas now.

Either way. It still needs to be relevant to be more than just historical recreation.
 

Monkey Turned Wolf

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
8,784
Reaction score
2,828
Location
New York
Well...yeah. If I want to know about meth, Id probably ask a meth head, not a crack head.
Just want to add a caveat. Neither I as a person, martial artist, nor moderator of martialtalk are recommending that people go and ask meth users about what meth is like. Please do not do this, it is a bad idea.
 

drop bear

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
20,495
Reaction score
5,403
Well...yeah. If I want to know about meth, Id probably ask a meth head, not a crack head.

Where as for me. I am just going to trust all those medical professionals. Even though they have never tried it for themselves.

Over those guys who have used it and tell me is totally cool.

(Yeah meth and crack are probably different. And we call meth ice anyway. )
 

Monkey Turned Wolf

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
8,784
Reaction score
2,828
Location
New York
Where as for me. I am just going to trust all those medical professionals. Even though they have never tried it for themselves.

Over those guys who have used it and tell me is totally cool.

(Yeah meth and crack are probably different. And we call meth ice anyway. )
Yeah I get your point and agree. That's why I added the second post. I just couldn't resist making the comment
 
Top