Learn Karate in "Three Or Four" Years?

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
The difference is that no other gymnasts are actively trying smash you in the face with the gym equipment.
Il think you find that gravity is ACTIVELY trying to smash you in the the floor, or what ever piece of gym equipment is between you and the floor
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
Gravity ia a common variable in either scenario.
well one) gravity isn't variable, its something of a constant, certainly if you are in the same country,,, ,two) you cannot by defintion have a common variable, if it's variable its not common and if its common its not a variable, three), the Kinect energy , of hitting the ground at speed is much greater than can be inflicted by a punch, unless the the one doing the punches are themselves falling from a height at speed
 

RTKDCMB

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
3,159
Reaction score
736
Location
Perth, Western Australia
well one) gravity isn't variable, its something of a constant, certainly if you are in the same country,,, ,two) you cannot by defintion have a common variable, if it's variable its not common and if its common its not a variable, three), the Kinect energy , of hitting the ground at speed is much greater than can be inflicted by a punch, unless the the one doing the punches are themselves falling from a height at speed
One)
The gravitational force between two objects varies as the masses of the two objects and the distance between them varies. It is only the acceleration due to gravity that is constant for objects on the surface of the Earth, not gravity as a whole.

Two)
The definition of 'variable' means 'something that varies', it has nothing to do with how common it is. Something can vary in two different situations, i.e.
y = ax
and
y = bx
Where 'x' is the 'common' variable.
And I think the word you were looking for is 'constant', which is not variable by definition.

Three)
In both cases there is someone falling to the ground with the same kinetic energy (all other things being equal), however, in the case of the gymnast they have not been punched in the head first. A lot of people who die from hitting their head on the ground during a fight or an attack usually die because they were unconscious from the punch and don't have any control of how they fall.
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
One)
The gravitational force between two objects varies as the masses of the two objects and the distance between them varies. It is only the acceleration due to gravity that is constant for objects on the surface of the Earth, not gravity as a whole.

Two)
fall.

no it doesn't,, the gravity experienced by any object falling to earth is the same irrespective of the mass of the object

if your saying that gravitational pull is less on mars your correct, but as nether our gymnast or our karate man is on mars, it seem slightly leftfield

And the acceleration due to gravity. Varies by air restance, so not at all a constant
 
Last edited:

RTKDCMB

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
3,159
Reaction score
736
Location
Perth, Western Australia
no it doesn't,, the gravity experienced by any object falling to earth is the same irrespective of the mass of the object

No, the ACCELERATION DUE TO GRAVITY (g) is a constant regardless of mass.

F = GmM/r2

Where M = the mass of the Earth
m = the mass of the person.

if your saying that gravitational pull is less on mars your correct, but as nether our gymnast or our karate man is on mars, it seem slightly leftfield

Both the karate man and the gymnast would still experience the same acceleration due to gravity if they were both on mars.

And the acceleration due to gravity. Varies by air restance, so not at all a constant

No, the acceleration due to gravity is constant regardless of air resistance or other forces. It is only the resultant force that is different. The only way to change the value of g is to change the mass of the Earth.

Free Fall and Air Resistance
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
No, the ACCELERATION DUE TO GRAVITY (g) is a constant regardless of mass.

F = GmM/r2

Where M = the mass of the Earth
m = the mass of the person.



Both the karate man and the gymnast would still experience the same acceleration due to gravity if they were both on mars.



No, the acceleration due to gravity is constant regardless of air resistance or other forces. It is only the resultant force that is different. The only way to change the value of g is to change the mass of the Earth.

Free Fall and Air Resistance
clearly not, if i drop a feather and a hammer the feather will not accelerate at the same rate as the hammer, ergo the rate of acceleration due to gravity is NOT a constant,
 

RTKDCMB

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
3,159
Reaction score
736
Location
Perth, Western Australia
clearly not, if i drop a feather and a hammer the feather will not accelerate at the same rate as the hammer, ergo the rate of acceleration due to gravity is NOT a constant,
Drop them both in a vacuum and they will accelerate at the same rate:


Feather drop, hammer drop, mike drop.
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
Drop them both in a vacuum and they will accelerate at the same rate:


Feather drop, hammer drop, mike drop.
yes but the very defintion of a constant is it applies everywhere on every occasion, as it doesnt apply to feathers on earth, which is where we live, except for in a vacuum chamber, then it clearly is not a constant
 

drop bear

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
23,460
Reaction score
8,150
yes but the very defintion of a constant is it applies everywhere on every occasion, as it doesnt apply to feathers on earth, which is where we live, except for in a vacuum chamber, then it clearly is not a constant

Yeah but you are technically applying another force.

So two tennis balls of the same size drop at different rates if I catch one.

And why physics conversions get silly.
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
Yeah but you are technically applying another force.

So two tennis balls of the same size drop at different rates if I catch one.

And why physics conversions get silly.
and if another force affects it its not a constant, constants have to be eer constant to be a constant
 

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
30,049
Reaction score
10,606
Location
Hendersonville, NC
that's because they haven't managed to perform the two techneque well enough to do so, but a 100 is an made up standard that you have imposed to separate the wheat from the,chaff, , any one can learn golf in an hour, what score they achieve is a,separate issue
That’s like saying “learning to punch” doesn’t include the punch actually working, and “learning to fight” just means you can perform the movements, even if they don’t do what they are supposed to.
 

DaveB

Master Black Belt
Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
294
I can't believe Jobo is trying to argue science again.
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
That’s like saying “learning to punch” doesn’t include the punch actually working, and “learning to fight” just means you can perform the movements, even if they don’t do what they are supposed to.
as long as the ball ends up in the hole , then they have achieved what they were supposed to, i told you it was a poor comparison, golf is the only sport were you get infinite goes at hitting the target, well at least until it gets dark
 
Last edited:

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
30,049
Reaction score
10,606
Location
Hendersonville, NC
as long as the ball ends up in the hole , then they have achieved what they were supposed to, i told you it was a poor comparison, golf is the only sport were you get infinite goes at hitting the target, well at least until it gets dark
No, that’s not playing golf - that’s just hitting a ball in the air. And hitting into the air isn’t a requirement. Making it go where you want is an important factor. Just like a punch, in that.
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
No, that’s not playing golf - that’s just hitting a ball in the air. And hitting into the air isn’t a requirement. Making it go where you want is an important factor. Just like a punch, in that.
no the only purpose of golf is to get the ball in to a hole in the ground, that is all you need to do to be,successful, there are no limit to the number of goes you can have or the amount of time you can spend doing it. Apart from the course may close for the night, so in that frame you could spend 16hours and many thousands of hits, complete the eighteen holes and have succesfully reached the objective of the game.
 

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
30,049
Reaction score
10,606
Location
Hendersonville, NC
no the only purpose of golf is to get the ball in to a hole in the ground, that is all you need to do to be,successful, there are no limit to the number of goes you can have or the amount of time you can spend doing it. Apart from the course may close for the night, so in that frame you could spend 16hours and many thousands of hits, complete the eighteen holes and have succesfully reached the objective of the game.
That’s specious reasoning, at best. There is a measure built into the game (par). What you are saying is like saying lasting the whole fight is the goal, even if you are badly beaten and never land a single blow.
 

Latest Discussions

Top