Judging Forms at Tournaments

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
30,048
Reaction score
10,606
Location
Hendersonville, NC
Agreed Its ridiculous so basically If I wanted to I could turn up to a shotokan tournament and enter as a black belt (even though I've never trained it) and just throw my hands around and pretend to know what I'm doing and I could get a gold medal....how's that fair in any way.
If you showed up at a Shotokan tournament, they'd expect to see something that looks much like the Shotokan kata. And there would be principles (as others have pretty clearly pointed out) that would be judged, even in an open competition. So, just throwing your hands around would get nothing. Now, if you assembled an interesting new kata, there's no reason that couldn't win in a competition, so long as you are doing it well, and it feels cohesive.
 

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
30,048
Reaction score
10,606
Location
Hendersonville, NC
You couldn't do that at a one style tournament though, all the judges would be Shotokan dan grades and the katas would all be Shotokan so they'd know immediately that you weren't doing it correctly. The problem is the open competitions where multiple styles compete against each other with judges not knowing whether they are correct or not.
Even at the open competitions, it shouldn't be a problem (assuming reasonably similar approaches among the competing styles). Whether a kata is centuries old or brand new shouldn't be relevant in that competition, so if someone makes one up, and it's a good kata, and they perform it well (focus, intent, power, balance, etc.), then it's competing on even footing, as it should be.
 

Tez3

Sr. Grandmaster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
27,608
Reaction score
4,902
Location
England
Even at the open competitions, it shouldn't be a problem (assuming reasonably similar approaches among the competing styles). Whether a kata is centuries old or brand new shouldn't be relevant in that competition, so if someone makes one up, and it's a good kata, and they perform it well (focus, intent, power, balance, etc.), then it's competing on even footing, as it should be.

He specifically mentioned a Shotokan tournament though which is why I posted as I did. You wouldn't be able to bluff your way through a single style competition.
 

JR 137

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 26, 2015
Messages
5,162
Reaction score
3,224
Location
In the dojo
If you showed up at a Shotokan tournament, they'd expect to see something that looks much like the Shotokan kata. And there would be principles (as others have pretty clearly pointed out) that would be judged, even in an open competition. So, just throwing your hands around would get nothing. Now, if you assembled an interesting new kata, there's no reason that couldn't win in a competition, so long as you are doing it well, and it feels cohesive.
If you showed up at a Shotokan tournament, in pretty much every instance you'd have to perform a Shotokan approved kata. They'd be very little variation allowed; those variations would be different Shotokan schools' variations and not personal variations.

In a nutshell, if it's not on a Shotokan syllabus, it's not allowed. Unless of course there was a "create your own kata" division. I don't see that happening too often in a Shotokan tournament though.
 
Last edited:

Kung Fu Wang

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
14,174
Reaction score
4,591
Location
Austin, Tx/Shell Beach, Ca
How can people judge forms they have no knowledge of? If I don't do your style i cannot judge anything that matters about a form.
In Kung Fu tournament, it usually separates

- internal style,
- external style.

In external style, it also separates

- northern style,
- southern style.

In the northern style, it includes:

- long fist,
- preying mantis,
- Baji,
- Pi Gua,
- Lou Han,
- ...

To find one Kung Fu northern style judge who knows all northern styles is impossible.
 

MA_Student

Black Belt
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
577
Reaction score
370
Forms are for training and study.

You don't judge a javelin thrower by how nicely they lift weights, you don't go to a football game to watch the players do jumping jacks.

Martial arts are for fighting. People gain other benefits from the training, but the arts exist to help people deal with violence.

When we make a big thing of forms we spread the idea that aesthetics have a place in the martial arts, and they do not. Because the next thing is people start altering forms to look pretty and then mangling techniques to look cool and then you have a dance instead of a fighting art.

A great many karate styles went through this in the 20th century and are only starting to recover.
Yep I competed in forms for a while never got far. Even though my forms are at a good level the guys I was against were doing backflips and jackie chan type stunts whereas I did normal forms how I'd been taught them
 

Latest Discussions

Top