218,000 people have permits with 1200 having them revoked over the last 4 years. That's still a pretty good record of responsible CWP carriers.Tenn. lawmakers approve allowing guns in bars
By LUCAS L. JOHNSON II, Associated Press Writer Lucas L. Johnson Ii, Associated Press Writer Fri Jun 5, 7:34 am ET
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090605...X3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA3Rlbm5sYXdtYWtlcg--NASHVILLE, Tenn. Handguns will soon be allowed in bars and restaurants in Tennessee under a new law passed by state legislators who voted to override the governor's veto.
The legislation that takes effect July 14 retains an existing ban on consuming alcohol while carrying a handgun, and restaurant owners can still opt to ban weapons from their establishments.
Thirty-seven other states have similar laws.
The state Senate voted 21-9 on Thursday against Democratic Gov. Phil Bredesen's veto, a day after the House also voted 69-27 to override.
They overrode critics, including Bredesen, who said it's a bad idea to have guns and alcohol in close proximity.
Democratic Sen. Doug Jackson, the main sponsor of the bill, said state Safety Department records show handgun permit holders in Tennessee are responsible.
Of the roughly 218,000 handgun permit holders in Tennessee, 278 had their permits revoked last year, records show. Since 2005, state records shows nearly 1,200 people have lost their permits.
Revocations are issued for felony convictions, while permits can be suspended for pending criminal charges or for court orders of protection.
But allowing guns in bars where there are people drinking... umm I'm sorry but I don't think this is the greatest of ideas here.
Alcohol releases inhibitions. An disagreement can turn into an argument an argument can turn into a fight, a fight with one or more guns involved turns into well... you know the rest.
Still there is this portion of the article to consider as well...
The law, which was supported by the National Rifle Association, has been successful in other states, its chief lobbyist said.
"Of those 37 states, not one state has attempted to repeal or amend those statutes because they've been successful," Chris Cox said.
Yet Obama is calling for a nationwide ban
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,347690,00.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080419/pl_politico/9722
and so forth
Is it going to be worth having guns if they are wanting to take them away? Is it worth passing laws permitting them where they were banned before only to have them taken away...? What's the point?