Xue Sheng
All weight is underside
Tai Chi vs. MMA from Daoist Gate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I disagree. I think most people who train boxing, BJJ, wrestling, judo, Muay Thai, MMA, or any other sport oriented art can fight. Doesn't mean they are war machines or lack gaps in their training. Doesn't mean they have no bad habits. But if you apply what you're learning, it will be there when you need it. people who train the styles above can do those styles under pressure. Other styles? I guess it's up to the individual.Let's be honest: most people can't fight, no matter what system they train. Most people don't train realistically. That's life.
But that is a fault of the individual and how it has been passed along to him, and the failings in the instruction he has received and in his own training methods. It is not an endictment of the system itself.
Really honestly, so what? This means nothing.
Absolutely I've been in gyms where guys have been training for 10 years and are total garbage and couldn't fight at all but they still come and train and take part because they just enjoy themselves there's nothing wrong with that. People think because you do martial arts you can fight. That's nonsense there's loads of people who've never done a class in there life who can fight. Some people are fighters some aren't and no training will ever change thatSteve, not all BJJ, MMA, Muay Thai guys can fight. I have been in plenty a gym where there is a massive hierarchy between the good practitioner's and those that come in once in a while and treat it like a hobby. This is particularly true in mma gyms I have checked out here in Las Vegas. A little less in BJJ and a lot, lot, lot less in Muay Thai. Still there are guys that can't fight practicing sporting based martial arts. Most that I have encountered are the once or twice a week hobbyists though.
The failings of some guy is only an example to you of how to not do it, and there are always variables. Beyond that, it means nothing.Did Xu, all by himself, with his video, upset me so much that I made the posts I made and linked the sites I linked????
no..... It just seems to be the straw that broke the camels back......
Over the years I've taught many younger fellows the tricks I have learned, whether it be boxing, Wing Chun, The way of no way(what I took from jkd), how to flip someone etcetc..you get the picture.The failings of some guy is only an example to you of how to not do it, and there are always variables. Beyond that, it means nothing.
The success of some guy is only an example of how it might be done, and there are always variables. Beyond that, it means nothing.
How YOU do it will determine if you fail or succeed. And yes, you guessed it, there are always variables. Take the lessons where they may be found. And then do YOURS.
Beyond that, it means nothing.
Really, I mean that. It means nothing.
In my opinion, a style has a body of principles that guide how all techniques are done. The techniques are a physical embodiment of the principles. The principles matter more than the specific techniques, but I guess that could be seen as "loosely similar".Over the years I've taught many younger fellows the tricks I have learned over my years, whether it be boxing, Wing Chun, The way of no way(what I took from jkd), how to flip someone etcetc..you get the picture.
But here's the thing - some caught on right off, some never did. Some people are naturally aggressive and fearless, others more cautious and timid. Some were naturally coordinated and physically gifted, while some tripped over their own feet.
Some left knowing how to effectively use their body as a weapon, others not so much.
And this is to say nothing on the matter of strength and conditioning.
And all that is only one side of the coin. On the other, you have what is taught. The art itself. Is it works be? And within that, if it is, is it being trained and applied in a practical way.
So you can teach a strong and agile kid total bullshido, and have him fight a clumsy out of shape, or timid kid with decent training and the latter will still get mauled most of the time.
That is to say nothing of the 'style', which is best understood as a category of loosly similar techniques anyway.
Agreed, I could have worded it better. But even within styles there can be wildly different principles at play manifesting as wildly different techniques. Compare say, traditional boxing with 52, and compare that to the pugilist style of the early 20th century. It's all boxing right? The same is certainly true of wing Chun as well.In my opinion, a style has a body of principles that guide how all techniques are done. The techniques are a physical embodiment of the principles. The principles matter more than the specific techniques, but I guess that could be seen as "loosely similar".
Let's be honest: most people can't fight, no matter what system they train. Most people don't train realistically. That's life.
But that is a fault of the individual and how it has been passed along to him, and the failings in the instruction he has received and in his own training methods. It is not an endictment of the system itself.
Really honestly, so what? This means nothing.
Let's be honest: most people can't fight, no matter what system they train. Most people don't train realistically. That's life.
But that is a fault of the individual and how it has been passed along to him, and the failings in the instruction he has received and in his own training methods. It is not an endictment of the system itself.
Really honestly, so what? This means nothing.
As a former tai chi guy, I find these events uncomfortable on a number of levels: