Who you are? Should it matter? Truth has no bearing upon personage. No one man can claim to know it all.
This idea that you have that you're somebody because of your background is pompous. It's the same idea that allows many to believe that one man created Taijiquan instead of a collective which I described above. No art as sophisticated as Taijiquan appears out of the blue. There had to be precursors to the art. Chinese History shows there were plenty of theories floating around. 7 of the ten principles of Taijiquan were already written down by Lee Dong Feng in his book on Liu He Ba Fa. Coincidence? I think not and to think these kungfu experts just wrote them down and then sat around just thinking about them but never developed forms to demostrate these Taiji principles that's preponderous!
I know the Chinese way not to challenge hardened ideas but that's not how it is in the West. Here you have to prove your theories and demostrate them and show they are proven. This is why Bruce Lee was so successful in gaining a world wide audience because he demostrated his theories. Taiji was never created to be a fighting art per see although it can be used for self defense. Taiji was created to be a spiritual opener to Taoism by it's founder Zhang San Feng. There were many such qi-gongs forms stringed together but ZSF's formed was more appealing because had Shaolin kung fu added to it. Shaolin has had an influence on all of Chinese martial arts. The Chen Villiage people took the Shaolin Red Fist and were practicing it for hundreds of years before Taiji came to their villiage. Chen people modified Taiji and made it more explosive and used hard training to make the body more indestructible. But nevertheless they didn't create Taiji and Yang Lu Chan said it was the Wudang Priests who created it and the Yang family continues to say it. The Communist regime is gone, History! It's persecution against free thinking Taoists and people who didn't conform to the it's doctrine are gone with it.
I will post an article written about Taiji and Breath. It goes into the some of the intricate details about how Taiji without regulation of breath isn't Taiji. It's true people are going around promoting Taiji as a marital art and now even as a healing exercise. When the history of Taiji lies with those who created it wanted to seek enlightment. The science of breath says not only does controlling the breath leads to good health but also enlightment if learned from an qualified teacher. General Lee the great master called "King of the sword" modified Wudang Taiji to include Xingyi and Baqua because in battle you need more than Taiji to win. Taiji is an advanced level art if used for fighting it was not designed to teach people who don't have fighting experience to fight against good fighters. This is why Yang Lu Chan only taught people who know how to fight already. Yang himself knew how to fight before learning Taiji. You must learn some hard, fast explosive training before you go into battle against other styles like Bak Mei, Hung Gar, MMA and Wing Chun. You get your azzkicked if you go against these styles just only knowing Taiji. This proves that Taiji was created to not be a martial art but only utilized martial art movements to move qi throughout the body while moving about. The Chen's modification is probably the best when it comes making Taiji into a marital art because they used a very powerful Shaolin style called Red Fists to make Taiji hard and explosive. Soft skills are highly important to mature martial artists who know you can easily defeat fire with water and hurt yourself and maybe lose the fight if you try to use fire against fire. But Taiji is not the only soft style there are Xingyi, Bagua, Cotton Fists and a few others not as known. To further illustrate the theory of using hard explosive training and having success in fighting look at Liu He Xingyi Quan which uses hard explosive energy combine with soft skill and has a record for being very destructive martial art. Also Bak Mei using a 50/50 formula and most of Emei and they martial arts are almost unmatched in battle real battle situations. Again Taiji isn't a martial art it is designed for spiritual purposes and breathing is an essential component without it there is no Taiji.
Intersting view on Yang history and Yang Luchan there although I don't think the Yang family would agree, but it appears you feel you know more than them anyway but just a point
Yang Lu Chan only taught people who know how to fight already
So who taught Jainhou and Banhou before Yang Luchan taught his sons?
More on this post of your later but first let me get to this
I never made any mention to knowing who I am and I got to tell you your post is all over the map here. I did say your post has told me all I need to know about you.
But what I find interesting here is that you are talking about the Chen family history as if I made any statement to its validity and I never said I thought the origin of Taijiquan was exclusively from the Chen family. Frankly I think there is a bit of story telling and mythology there as well. Not as much as surrounding, Zhang Sanfeng, but still a bit of myth.
Also I need to correct you view of the Chen family since it is well, incorrect. Although they are farmers referingg to them as uneducated and calling them farmers
Chen's some uneducated farmer creating Taiji
is well, wrong.
The member of the Chen family that is credited with inventing Taiji is Chen Wangting (1600-1680) who was not a farmer but a Ming Dynasty officer who was a warrior and a scholar. Not uneducated and not unfamiliar with martial arts and fighting, farming came later and after him his family are mainly farmers and Chen taijiquan practitioners.
And now this point
(A note: Qi Gong and all along with Lao Tzu and DaMo come from India and India Yoga and the concern with enlightment and longevity was always the chief purpose).
Qigong coming from India; actually the terminology “Qigong” was not used until the 1960s so I doubt it came from India but regardless, possible some but not all.
Da Mo; “IF” he existed he most certainly came from India, but again I doubt much of the Da Mo story as well. Particularly the whole cave bit of the story
Lao Tzu; nope, not from India he was, if he existed, Chinese. Actually there are a few Chinese historians that live and work in China that think they may actually have figured out who Lao Tzu was and again he was Chinese born and raised.
Also any thing Taoist is said to be from China, not external to China therefore not from India and there are some rather old Taoist qigong (daoyin) practices. Taoism is ChinaÂ’s indigenous religion.
And now to the point of the story; Zhang Sanfeng
Taiji was designed By Zhang San Feng from a template of Liu He Ba Fa created by Chen Tuan based upon other Taoists martial arts that incorporated Lao Tzu's water principles as the foundation of their styles.
ZSF used mostly Shaolin's Crane and Snake style then added it with Water Style to create Taiji. Water Style which was a smaller set was redesigned by Lee Dong Feng Chen's Tuan's chief disciple to add Xingyi and Bagua into it and thus made it longer. Let's not go any further with this history for now.
I am going to just ignore the Liu He Ba Fa stuff since its true origin is pretty vague and once again referring to a cave but this time with wall carvings.
You claim Zhang Sanfeng created taijiquan; ok which one?
Zhang Sanfeng is not mentioned throughout Chinese history until the 1650s in the “Epitaph of Wang Zhengnan” written by Huang Zongxi (1610-1695) [note: Chen Wangting 1600-1680] and he is mentioned there Wang Zhengnan is the only living successor to the martial arts lineage of neijia of which Zhang Sanfeng is the founder. He refers to Zhang Sanfeng as a Taoist alchemist and says that Zhang Sanfeng revised Shaolin style to emphasis offense and defense using softness and not relying on hardness. However it is not called taiji it is called Baiji by Wang’s son and it has little in common with taijiquan with no internal training and it is big on pressure point techniques. But it is a soft style like taiji.
But to the reference to Zhang Sanfeng in the Epitaph; it is believed it is more of a political move than a historical reference. A bit of “take that you foreign Manchu oppressors” kind of thing.
And now back to which Zhang Sanfeng?
The one I previously mentioned from the Yuan Dynasty (1279-1368) as stated by Sun Lutang
or the ones that were mentioned by Xu Yusheng who associated the name Zhang Sanfeng with at lest 10 different people but ultimately puts Zhang Sanfeng in the Sung Dynasty (969-1126) and who had hundreds of disciples in Shaanxi. And of course there is the Zhang Sanfeng born in 1247 during the Southern Sung Dynasty (1127-1279) and there is another reference to him by another author that puts him in the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644)
In China since 1650 Zhang Sanfeng has been called a Taoist, a Shaolin Master, a Warrior and a Confucian by various rather well trained and reputable Chinese writers that were writing “the facts” about Zhang Sanfeng…based on hear say and myth.
And it has also been said since 1650 that Zhang Sanfeng created taiji by watching a snake and a bird fight. And of course back to a cave; by being lead by a mysterious light into a cave (Martial arts founders like caves apparently) where he found 2 golden snakes and a book that gave him the idea for taijiquan. and it is also said that he took from the Yellow Emperor and Lao Tzu to devise taiji.
There is a rather long list of reputable authors since 1650 that have written histories of taijiquan that have linked it to Zhang Sanfeng in various ways but few have ever given any biographical information about him beyond myth. So far the only ones that completely ignore Zhang Senfeng is the Chen family and they have good reason to since it does not align with their taiji creation story.
This is part of my problem with the whole Zhang Sanfeng issue and the history you are posting; it is mostly based on myth.
There are a number of Chinese historians in China researching Chinese martial arts and their origins and so far none have come up with any proof that someone names Zhang Senfeng created taiji or created anything for that matter because they can find no record that he even existed and I doubt they are having any problem with translating Chinese.
You see Chinese history is punctuated with myth. A good example Yue Fei (1103-1142) although a real person and military officer is credited with the founding of several martial arts styles when if fact he nothing to do with most or any of them. It is an attempt at legitimacy or outright salesmanship by the person teaching the art. Yue Fei was a great warrior but he was not as prolific (in his short life) at developing martial arts styles as he is given credit for.
I am at a point where I believe that someone somewhere was a martial artists and did a lot of study of the "I Ching" and possibly daoyin (qigong) and you end up with taiji was it the Chen family? Could be. Could be that someone did develop something akin to the 13 postures and the melded that with a type of Qi training which was later picked up by the Chen family and melded with Paoqui (this has been put forth as a possibility by a couple of Chinese historians but the way) Could be that it originated with a Taoist on Wudang mountain, could be it was a Shaolin Master that converted to Taoism and came up with it could be any number of possible combinations of things but I do not know and the people that are trying to figure this out “in China” do not know either.
But you seem to be pretty convinced so maybe you better contact a few of the larger Chinese Universities and tell them what you know and how you know this. I can give you a couple of names to contact if you like maybe you can set them straight.
As to your article I would need to know who wrote it as well but it is nice to see that you are telling everyone that many of the excepted Taiji masters of the past are completely wrong when it comes to breathing. Also if your posting anything that is alleged to be written by Zhang Sanfeng I will tell you now I will not take it as any sort of legitimate document, just reread my post if you want to know why I would say that.
Also if you donÂ’t mind, exactly how long have you trained taiji and who was your teacher or your teachers teacher