Subak's real rules with physical evidences

[Gerry Seymour]

No one provided any counter evidence contradicting my Gyuksul proofs, Subak rule proofs, Breaking's origin proofs in any of those 3 threads. Do provide some reference, then we will examine whether the source is reputable & whether the reference is not made up with imagination. (Where did you hear that? That's a question to be asked.)

I provided counter evidence in the breaking thread. It was pretty easy.

 

[CB Jones]

View attachment 22031
But to give the devil his due, that horse could be Korean.

Just more cultural appropriation.

Everyone knows the Koreans were the first to beat dead horses.

 

[JowGaWolf]

Just more cultural appropriation.

Everyone knows the Koreans were the first to beat dead horses.

These seem appropriate right about now.

 

[Steven Lee]

Historians commonly accept pictures as proof, including archaeological wall drawings. Those are pictures that represent real life scenes, not a cartoon. Imagining that the painter did some imagined works on his own is outside reasonable doubts. For that reason, Subak had frontal slap and punch. This is because Namsun Choi said Subak had punch 100 years ago. Gimu Hong also said Subak had punch 60 years ago. Subyukta also has nickname "fist". Subyukta also has frontal slap. Subak Dance also has frontal slap. Taekkyeon also has frontal slap. By these corroborations, ancient Subak pictures showing frontal slap is valid & corroborated. Subak had frontal slap & punch.