thekuntawman
Purple Belt
i made this thread because i would like to see a continuing of the converstation with mscroggins.
i agree with pretty much everything you said, even the sillines of rank, titles belts etc. but only as a fighter do i agree with that. as a teacher you will have to have at least a style, and a method that you teach your art. as a school owner, here in the US, you need some way for students to see his progress. i dont use belts, but the titles i use are beginner 1, 2 3 etc.
for techniques, everyone has some kind of techniques they offer, they will have to be at least a system of basic hit and counters. now besides that, strategy is more important than techniques (hit me with this, then i do this and that, then disarm). pre arrange techniques, in my opinion are a little but of a waste. why do i say this, everybody knows them, nobody does them in fighting. if you will memorize something, then is better to memorize hit combinations, and counter attackings, with hit combinations. for the fighter who is not pursuing a teaching career, just to become a better fighter, style is depends to your philosophy. not all pilipinos were floaters. many took one method of fighting, and if he travelled it was to find work or build his reputation. build his reputation by having matches, not teaching "seminars". if the guy was a one style guy he wants to prove to himself and others that his style is superior to whatever you come to him with. (this is my philosophy). if he cant beat somebody, then is back to the drawing board, or learn what he does.
now if somebody has a mind to build a career of teaching, he might stay with one teacher, if he has a lot to teach, or travel learning as much as he can (edgar sulite, remy presas, roberto presas, and some others). style and rank is important because he wants to give credit to who he learns from, or to get permission to teach what he was given. even tho this is not my desire, how can i call it silly if i have never fought these men or there students? now if they suck , then it was silly. i have played with roberto presas, (once even with the nunchucks), and i would never call what he did silly.
but there is a whole lot of "floaters" i would call silly. and i dont feel like getting into one of those arguments again... :uhyeah:
i agree with pretty much everything you said, even the sillines of rank, titles belts etc. but only as a fighter do i agree with that. as a teacher you will have to have at least a style, and a method that you teach your art. as a school owner, here in the US, you need some way for students to see his progress. i dont use belts, but the titles i use are beginner 1, 2 3 etc.
for techniques, everyone has some kind of techniques they offer, they will have to be at least a system of basic hit and counters. now besides that, strategy is more important than techniques (hit me with this, then i do this and that, then disarm). pre arrange techniques, in my opinion are a little but of a waste. why do i say this, everybody knows them, nobody does them in fighting. if you will memorize something, then is better to memorize hit combinations, and counter attackings, with hit combinations. for the fighter who is not pursuing a teaching career, just to become a better fighter, style is depends to your philosophy. not all pilipinos were floaters. many took one method of fighting, and if he travelled it was to find work or build his reputation. build his reputation by having matches, not teaching "seminars". if the guy was a one style guy he wants to prove to himself and others that his style is superior to whatever you come to him with. (this is my philosophy). if he cant beat somebody, then is back to the drawing board, or learn what he does.
now if somebody has a mind to build a career of teaching, he might stay with one teacher, if he has a lot to teach, or travel learning as much as he can (edgar sulite, remy presas, roberto presas, and some others). style and rank is important because he wants to give credit to who he learns from, or to get permission to teach what he was given. even tho this is not my desire, how can i call it silly if i have never fought these men or there students? now if they suck , then it was silly. i have played with roberto presas, (once even with the nunchucks), and i would never call what he did silly.
but there is a whole lot of "floaters" i would call silly. and i dont feel like getting into one of those arguments again... :uhyeah: