So with JKD or with any of the martial arts for that matter its been said that you can't rush it. Well, it does make sense that a person who works harder and puts more into it is going to learn it faster. For instance, lets say there's a guy who does JKD and he trains three times a week for two hours each time. It makes sense that he will progress and develop knowledge, skill, ability, and technique faster than somebody who only trains once a week for an hour each time. You wouldn't call this rushing it but the person who trains three times a week for two hours each time will no doubt learn it faster.
Absolutely. If you look at the rare prodigies who got their BJJ black belt in 3 years or at Olympic gold medalist judokas or at UFC champions, one thing they all have in common is that they put in the hours training as if it was a full time job rather than a casual hobby.
There's more to it than just hours on the mat, of course. Quality of training matters just as much as quantity of training, but all other factors being equal, more time spent training = faster progression of skill.
PhotonGuy, do you have a question about this? What kind of a conversation are you hoping for here?
I believe PG is still fixating on the zen-influenced advice offered to him in some of his previous threads advancing the opinion that extra time and energy focused on achieving a black belt (or any other goalpost indicating a certain level of ability) is somehow counter-productive. Such advice might be sound in the context of aiming for zen-style "enlightenment", but it's factually inaccurate in the context of acquiring physical skills.
As usual your premise is flawed. It's not about rushing or taking your time. it's about the time it takes for the brain to absorb and create nural path ways.
How about doing a Google search for once.
It takes time to create neural pathways, but they get created a whole lot quicker with more repetition and time spent training. All other factors (natural talent, quality of instruction, etc) being equal, a martial artist who trains 30 hours per week for 3 years will be a lot more skillful than one who trains 5 hours per week for 10 years.
Some people can try as many times as they like and never learn...
In my experience, given adequate feedback mechanisms, a desire to learn, and enough time training, just about everyone will get better.
That said, many folks will plateau at a certain level because of a poor attitude for learning, inadequate feedback, limited time training, or a combination of all three.
DB, do you think this kind of intensive training like cramming every thing into a shorter time span would be suitable for, and should be made available as far as possible, to ALL students? Jx
I'm all in favor of having as many options for students as possible. That said, not everybody is interested in high-volume training, not everybody is mentally or physically prepared for it, and not everybody has a life situation that allows it.