Principles of military strategy.

Blotan Hunka

Master Black Belt
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Messages
1,462
Reaction score
20
The principles of Military Strategy are:

The principle of mass - given all things being equal, sending a single tactical allied unit to combat a single tactical enemy unit will result in 50% chance of defeat, resulting in a 1 to 1 loss ratio at the strategic level. However, sending two or more units to combat a single enemy unit will result in a loss ratio of less than 1 to 1.

Selecting decisive objectives.

Taking the initiative from your foe.

Concentrating your resources at the decisive point.

Economizing your resources by reducing waste.

Coordinating the movement of your resources to meet your objective.

Maintaining unity of command. The term unity of command refers to the principle that a subordinate should have one and only one superior to whom he or she is directly responsible.

Coordinating your tasks to achieve maximum effectiveness.

Maintaining secrecy until it is too late for your opponent to react.

Employing unexpected elements such as deception, speed, creativity, and audacity.

Keep your plans as simple as is needed to accomplish the task.

Choose a flexible strategy so you can adapt to changing conditions.

Organize for maximum efficiency.

Maintain a positive morale even in the face of set-backs.

Maintain momentum until success is accomplished.
 

Sukerkin

Have the courage to speak softly
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
15,325
Reaction score
493
Location
Staffordshire, England
No arguments with any of those.

Maybe add "Be lucky" to keep Napoleon happy?
 

Touch Of Death

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
May 6, 2003
Messages
11,610
Reaction score
849
Location
Spokane Valley WA
The principles of Military Strategy are:

The principle of mass - given all things being equal, sending a single tactical allied unit to combat a single tactical enemy unit will result in 50% chance of defeat, resulting in a 1 to 1 loss ratio at the strategic level. However, sending two or more units to combat a single enemy unit will result in a loss ratio of less than 1 to 1.

Selecting decisive objectives.

Taking the initiative from your foe.

Concentrating your resources at the decisive point.

Economizing your resources by reducing waste.

Coordinating the movement of your resources to meet your objective.

Maintaining unity of command. The term unity of command refers to the principle that a subordinate should have one and only one superior to whom he or she is directly responsible.

Coordinating your tasks to achieve maximum effectiveness.

Maintaining secrecy until it is too late for your opponent to react.

Employing unexpected elements such as deception, speed, creativity, and audacity.

Keep your plans as simple as is needed to accomplish the task.

Choose a flexible strategy so you can adapt to changing conditions.

Organize for maximum efficiency.

Maintain a positive morale even in the face of set-backs.

Maintain momentum until success is accomplished.
Sounds like a good chess lesson as well.:)
 

MBuzzy

Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
5,328
Reaction score
108
Location
West Melbourne, FL
Would you classify "Proportionality" as a principle of war or a rule of conduct?

On one hand, you are trying to use the correct amount of resources to accomplish your goal without wasting or misallocating your resources.

On the other hand, you are only using an amount of force proportional to that of your opponent, but enough to defeat him - i.e. no more than required.
 

Cirdan

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 31, 2006
Messages
2,494
Reaction score
441
Location
Oslo, Norway
Back when I was an infantry sergeant we summed up our view of how to conduct oureslves on the battlefield in two sentences:

-Conduct Offensive and Agressive operations in order to inflict maximum Damage upon the enemy and ensure a decisive Victory for our side.

-Our movements shall caracterized by Speed and Force as we do battle in Terrain that favors our units.


Not exactly Sun Tzu perhaps, but I like it. :biggun:
 

Latest Discussions

Top