Now days we look at men like Emperado, Parker, Chow, Funakoshi, Kano, etc, and think that they must have always been old masters in the arts. When in reality they were young men in their 20s who had a vision of what their art could be, and spent decades pursuing that vision. [/B]
An excellent point sir to be sure. All of the "old" masters were young kids feeling their way, and trying to make heads ot tails of what they were doing. They all changed over time and evolved. Some improved some didn't but they all changed. Modern "masters" are no exception. Parker was a brown belt when he began teaching on his own in Utah, and in his twenties when he opened his frist school and became the head instructor of his own system. Bruce Lee was 19 and opened his first school after barely 3/4 years of training in Wing Chun and was only 24 when he gave his famous demo at Parker's IKC. By then Parker was a "senior" in his very early thirties.
It was a different time and place in the arts, and high rank coud be attained for various reasons in a very short period of time, primarily because there was so "little" to learn, because so little was known.
That changed when Parker became exposed and began training with Chinese Masters, and discovered informatin he never knew existed.
Unfortunately Bruce Lee and others have given every wide eyed bored student who doesn't progress as fast as they think they should, the idea they can create their own style and then teach it. What they didn't understand was Bruce was creating a style for himself, not for teaching others. When you teach others you can't strip away information someone else may want or more importantly, need.
Kinda like teaching college but because you don't like math, you don't teach it to your students who may in fact need it for what they intend to do in life. You do them a disservice to those who trust you to know what they need, not what you like.
Everyone has a right to create their own way of training, but calling it a style and teaching it is questionable. There was a time when I knew every style that existed. Now there are so many "backyard styles." I don't even try to keep up with them. Actually creating a codified progressive curriculum with significant validity to all is more than the "notion" some of made it.
As usual sir, right on the money.