auxprix said:
I agree. If you have ever really refed, you would know right away that the second application is definately illegal. Why don't you tell us what organization you belong to? It would give your opinions some sort of validity. As of now, at least for me, they have none.
Gentlemen (particularly auxprix and bignick):
To help you reply with a more informed decision -
1.) Please re-examine the two photographs:
http://www.catchwrestle.com/pictures/historical_pictures/pages/legscissors_jpg.htm
2.) please re-read sensei Steve Scott's interpretation on post #2:
"the second photo would not pass the referee's test because of the neck crank situation."
3.) Please re-fresh yourselve's with the IJF referee's rules:
http://www.ijf.org/rule/rule_referee.php
Prohibited Acts, article 27, (21) To apply leg scissors to the opponents trunk (Dojime), neck, or head, (scissors with crossed feet while stretch out the legs.)
It now comes down to the 'referee's decision': I respectfully do not share sensei Steve Scott's opinion, and certainly not bigick's nor auxprix's, regarding the second photo: my referee's test is that the shime-waza's of sankaku-jime or jigoku-jime or hadaka-jime or kataha-jime put more pressure on the neck than that demonstrated in the second photograph, which, in my referree's test, is putting pressure on the upper shoulders more than the neck. So I feel that Prohibited Acts (21) does not apply to the second photograph.
Any and all informed and intelligent opinions welcomed regarding my call!