Jerry,
I believe that Furtry was stating that in 'Systema', we do not study chi to do no contact work...and Ryabco would be VERY much in agreement. Furtry, as you may not know, Is an instructor of Systema - certified by BOTH Vlad and Misha....and as such, I do beleive he was referrencing from a very experienced System-ists position...not as an attack on what you might do in your chosen arts.
Quotes: "Micheal has no-contact hitting, he has hitting for qi disruption, he has healing work, he has rooting work, the sinking is remeniscent of Xing-yi, etc.">>>From another Systema 'teachers' point of place (and also one that has a background in numerous m.arts) I can say the points you recognize from your experience in your arts - are done differently in The System. And I also add, Furtry does these things also as does VV and MR (and many others) BUT - the training does not develop whatever you see congruent to your views.
" I cannot speak to how or how overtly it's taught in Systema.">>>Furtry CAN speak about this from his years experience as a personal student of Vlad and Misha as well. Hence, as we are speaking about Systema, his statements, out of respect; do carry a great deal of weight re: this subject as it relatates to Sytema training and viewpoint.
"I've met many practitioners who didn't know it was there, but it certainly is."
<<And out of respect for you, Jerry...I will also state that many people from different arts 'see' things that are 'true' - to their point of view, using their dictionary or vocabulary of training experienced. This is a very common thing to Systema folks. After all, by nature; when a person sees something - they attempt to relate it or catagorize it to what they already know. In Systema, there are some very well versed Chinese system m.artists - such as Arthur Sennot or Larry Wall (amongst others) -- that can relate to what Systema presents and make comparisons to thier CMA training. I have a fair bit of Ba-Gua in my past, and 'see' many things apparently as similar to B-G. BUT - having done Systema under VV, MR and a few others - I KNOW that these are semming similarities from my previous training that have nothing at all, really; to do with Systema as it is passed on. MR, in particular; would be very direct to state that chi has nothing at all to do with his abilities...and although many who do believe in chi still chose to believe they are correct, and disregard Mishas personal beliefs. Some say in conversations I have had that "He and Vlad dont know that they are doing - chi, prana, cyclic life energy, whatever - But they ARE doing it"! THAT is born of the filter one has for what one sees.
Misha could just as easily watch, let us say; a B-Gua master..and through Mishas eyes, say: "Look how he moves with Gods grace in his heart"! Out of respect for the teachers of Systema, when we 'speak' of the art - it is natural to attempt to express ourselves in their teaching base. If we were speaking of Silat - I would have to respect those who actually did this, from Silats language and base of teaching; and maybe point out similarities..but not say they were doing something but did not know why.
Let us not quibble over terminolgy - for Furtry or myself are not as fluent in CMA/Silat terms as you might be...nor are you as experienced in Systema as we may be.
The similarities are far more important than differences in beliefs, training or terminology, are they not? Still, if we speak of these similarites, and they occur to arise from different places - we can discuss mostly the superficial appearences.
(And Furtry, my friend, please excuse me for attempting to answer for 'you'.
I encourage you to correct me if I assume too much...and hope to read your views on this subject.)
mscroggins last post is correct in content, from where I sit.