Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't care if they call it chi or fajin or physics or Martian mind control rays. The fact is that in the first 2 videos the demo dummies are throwing themselves around in a way which is not based on the actual physical movements of the demonstrator. It's either conscious fakery or (more likely, IMO) the result of self-hypnosis and psychological conditioning. If the demonstrator tried the same movements with someone who hadn't been taught to respond that way, the results would be completely different.None of the demonstators in the videos i linked has said their fajin is done with chi.
None of the demonstators in the videos i linked has said their fajin is done with chi.
White crane punch of death. Against that, none will stand. It's been proven. In a court of law, no less. And written about in peer-reviewed journals. Of the scientific variety.
Perhaps more an example of Shaping, since that produces a progressive series of responses based upon rewards for progressive approximations of the desired behavior. This isn't a pure example of shaping (it does follow some of the principles of both Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning), but it's likely the approval of the instructor and other students that serves as the reward, and the student gradually becomes more and more "responsive" - giving a larger response to a smaller input.Interesting hypothesis. If I understand you, it begins with a legitimate expression of technique, and proceeds incrementally through conditioning and suggestion.
The technique seems similar to classical conditioning, where the unconditioned stimulus (US) would be the actual, initial pushes from the teacher, and the corresponding unconditioned response (UR) would be the fall in response to a real push. Next, the conditioning would consist of the suggestion of the teacher's abilities, along with the witnessing of the technique performed on previously conditioned students; along with a gradual reduction of the visible movement (and push effort) of the teacher. As a result, what would be a neutral stimulus (NS) to a non-student (the light touch), has become a conditioned stimulus (CS) to the student, leading to a conditioned reaction (CR): the light touch (NS -> CS) results in a physical response (CR).
Classical conditioning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good catch. I eschewed the operant path because of what I saw as a lack of reward, but the instructor's attention (and, as you wrote, approval) is a reward. "Pick me, Sifu!"Perhaps more an example of Shaping, since that produces a progressive series of responses based upon rewards for progressive approximations of the desired behavior. This isn't a pure example of shaping (it does follow some of the principles of both Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning), but it's likely the approval of the instructor and other students that serves as the reward, and the student gradually becomes more and more "responsive" - giving a larger response to a smaller input.
And a powerful reward for most folks - more so to some people, and maybe those are the people who are drawn to these instructors.Good catch. I eschewed the operant path because of what I saw as a lack of reward, but the instructor's attention (and, as you wrote, approval) is a reward. "Pick me, Sifu!"
The girl way in the back in the black top and skirt looks kinda of cute not the one sitting on the red chair that one seems ok...the one next to the ugly one holding the pink thing may be third best. The one girl white shirt black pants top of green bleachers looks cute too. I get distracted easy by cute girls.I'm not going to stick my foot into these threads that Zeny has posted, as I have told him I do not pretend to know enough about all these to have an opinion. That said, have a look at this video, especially Adam Mizner's freestyle demo from 5:02 onwards.*I'm outta here*
Did you see the video of Ian Sinclair (Tai Chi vs. MMA) that I posted in another thread? There's a pole dancer doing a demo (not like that!) in the background. I think you'd like it.I get distracted easy by cute girls.
Omg she is polishing the pole too her stroke work is impeccable.Did you see the video of Ian Sinclair (Tai Chi vs. MMA) that I posted in another thread? There's a pole dancer doing a demo (not like that!) in the background. I think you'd like it.![]()
Ya gotta respect professionals.Omg she is polishing the pole too her stroke work is impeccable.
If the demonstrator tried the same movements with someone who hadn't been taught to respond that way, the results would be completely different.
If you can't throw then look for another way to bring him down. For example let's use seoi nage a common arm throw. If you get the arm break it first over the shoulder so you got that at least. If you are not getting under his center of gravity for what ever reason, then you could step to the side and behind him under the arm you hold and choke and kick out his back of knee.Because you can't always throw and if you are pushing properly, or understand a push in Taiji it also uproots. So it takes advantage of center of gravity. Also if you watch 3rd OP video closely, they are not all pushes.
My question then is what do you do if you can't throw?
Actually I didn't mind that video, looks more plausible. If something looks plausible then I will say so, if not I will say it looks like bs. For me, I would have to touch hands. I have felt fa jin pushes and they have pushed me back so I do but in it, but it wasn't so exaggerated and my teacher said proper lining up of the body to the point of off balance. I am a big advocate of realism in self defense. I was telling my student this that we can do Taijiquan for health if that is your main focus, but I want you to look at the applications to have an idea. As teacher's in my opinion, what we partake in knowledge we want our students to defend themselves intelligently and give them all we have to offer. I feel giving a student a low percentage method of dealing with an attacker is irresponsible. I recall the first time I asked my student to throw a punch I said leaving your arm out for me to demonstrate and talk about points is good however, in real life this won't work so throw your punch and snap it back to ready position.What about this video? Is it BS?
I don't have a problem with that one. I'd have to touch hands with the teacher myself to fully gauge his skill level and I don't know for sure how deliberately compliant his demo partner was being, but at least the teacher was using real techniques and his demo partner was reacting to the actual technique being performed rather than throwing himself based on a non-verbal suggestion.What about this video? Is it BS?