Commercial EPAK schools generally have some variation of a syllabus they teach from. Doc's Martial Arts University has a strongly academically oriented program which would fill your narrowly defined definition of syllabus.
I'm surprised to hear of one which was not a college course which was so structured as to have testing dates, assignments, and contact information handed out.
BTW, it's not my definition, Furtry set it (post 28)
Jerry...odd question..classical m.arts are most often taught very much in a progressional.
Basic kata/form 1..then 2 then 3.
Some are, some are not. I don't believe Akijitsu or any of it's decentandants (Judo, Jujitsu, Akido, BJJ) are generally taught in forms, nor are most of the Silat arts I've seen, nor my limited experience with Thai Boxing arts
In Systema - the rule is no rules.
The problem I've had with this statement is that it fails to account for the fact that two systema practitioners have fundamentally the same material. "No rules" equates to "no material". Pushing the energy of a strike out of your body is a rule, as is relaxation, as is dropping weight, as is breathing out, as are any number of other "systema responses".
Don't get me wrong, I think Systema is a great art and I'm extremely fond of the training methodologies. I also agree that Systema is in the "less rigid" group (as opposed to the very "be in this stance, step back with this leg, move this hand from here to there" arts). To a great extent we agree in principle; I think my issue here is over rhetorical catchisms and the tendancy of people to believe them.
Jerry..over the 41 years in the arts I have had - I did the classical method. And although 'you' may not have seen the rules and regs of an art - its probably because your not a teacher of any particular art that is deeply conventional/classical....basic form 1 the 2 and 3 and then the pinan 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5. Its very organized...yet Sytema is not. Not ofr the students...NOT for the guides - and MOST certainly not for Vlad.
I don't believe that I've made such a claim, and I'm not a fan of people attempting to appeal to their own authority. I've seen everything from the very structured to the very loose. I've argued in this thread that Systema did have a sylibus, then agreed that whether this was true depended on how one defined it, then argued that the offered definition (by Frurty) was not useful as the arts he was comparing systema to did not have one under that definition.
Simple as breathing. Is there a syllabus for breath? OH sure, you can enforce one - make one up - but you breath as you wear your skin. All Systema does is become you in so many ways that you/systema simply are one.
An interesting comparison since how to breathe is part of the Systema cirrriculum. Everyone is taught the same breathing techniques. Everyone tries to use the same breathing techniques.