michaeledward said:You are correct, that hijackers did not plow planes into buildings. But, terroriss using planes as weapons is a scenario that had been widely discussed throughout the Counterterrorism Security Group (headed by Richard Clarke) since before the 1996 Atlanta Summer Olympics.
Next, the 'Standard Operating Procedure' (and that there is a 'Standard Operating Procedure' about this say alot in itself) is that the military aircraft would intercept the commercial airplane that has deviated from its flight plan.
A NORAD spokesman says its fighters routinely intercept aircraft. When planes are intercepted, they typically are handled with a graduated response. The approaching fighter may rock its wingtips to attract the pilot's attention, or make a pass in front of the aircraft. Eventually, it can fire tracer rounds in the airplane's path, or, under certain circumstances, down it with a missile.Finally, I have not ordered the military aircraft to destroy a commercial airliner. Although, as I understand the events of September 11, 2001. Richard Clarke did seek that authorization through Vice President Dick Cheney, who, in turn received positive authorization from President George Bush.
But, since the US Military F-15's (from Otis) and F-16's (from Langley) could not close the gap quick enough, this order was not put to the test.
Mike
Sorry Mike, it should hae read WOULD. as in would have ordered.