Nike-do is always my second line of defense. My first line is being aware enough of my environment to get out of the situation before it develops.
Running is great. Especially when you ditch your lover in the process and let the hungry wolves have her for dinner. Why, that's the very definition of heroism.
To the rest of ye: Let's roll up our sleaves and engage (Not with your girlfriend).
If you can-do it.
Great point. What exactly do you do when you're with your GF, gentlemen?
I think even if you weren't a faster runner, some attackers may not want to bother chasing after you - too much effort, or don't want to be seen.
Rapists, especially, tend to want a girl who will submit, not one who's going to fight and scream.
I'm not a very fast runner but I'd give it a go for a block or two.
Running is great. Especially when you ditch your lover in the process and let the hungry wolves have her for dinner. Why, that's the very definition of heroism.
To the rest of ye: Let's roll up our sleaves and engage (Not with your girlfriend).
Great point. What exactly do you do when you're with your GF, gentlemen?
Certainly a good idea to get away if possible, but is that the best option? As Hand Sword said, what if you're not a fast runner? Then what? Get away if possible, but be prepared to engage if need be.
You know, this question of running is something that has bothered me through the years. I always wondered if it was an incorrect mindset to try and think both ways. I mean, is it really possible to think both ways? Can you really consciosly keep a 50/50 mindset of fighting if I must or running if I can? Is it detrimental to try and think this way?
For me, I always thought along the lines that it was detrimental. Consider that an attacker is fully committed emotionally, and mentally, as well as physically. It's 100 percent go for them. Can that be met with a 50/50 mind? I say no. Would it be better, for self defense sake to committ one one or another? I say Yes. If you're a runnner, then run everytime. Otherwise fight full out. Meet it the same way the attacker has. Realistically that is the only way to be succesful for a real life brutal attack IMHO. Granted, my upbringing and enviroment played a part of the "not going out like a punk" attitude, but, I always felt it was relevant. Thinking back to the old schoolers too, they were never those kind of personalities, though they preached it in their teachings. They were nasty fighters. The old school students were too. I remember a line in an old book I had as kid that spoke of things lacking in the arts at that time. It was a de-emphasis on guts, or courage fighting. I think it has merit.
You know, this question of running is something that has bothered me through the years. I always wondered if it was an incorrect mindset to try and think both ways. I mean, is it really possible to think both ways? Can you really consciosly keep a 50/50 mindset of fighting if I must or running if I can? Is it detrimental to try and think this way?
For me, I always thought along the lines that it was detrimental. Consider that an attacker is fully committed emotionally, and mentally, as well as physically. It's 100 percent go for them. Can that be met with a 50/50 mind? I say no. Would it be better, for self defense sake to committ one one or another? I say Yes. If you're a runnner, then run everytime. Otherwise fight full out. Meet it the same way the attacker has. Realistically that is the only way to be succesful for a real life brutal attack IMHO. Granted, my upbringing and enviroment played a part of the "not going out like a punk" attitude, but, I always felt it was relevant. Thinking back to the old schoolers too, they were never those kind of personalities, though they preached it in their teachings. They were nasty fighters. The old school students were too. I remember a line in an old book I had as kid that spoke of things lacking in the arts at that time. It was a de-emphasis on guts, or courage fighting. I think it has merit.