Are we still looking for him? Is he still a threat? Why can't we find him? Any thoughts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he is hiding out in Pakistan like many believe, then there is a hell of a lot of stuff that we would have to deal with aside from the boom boom part. Some of the regions there are outside the control of the central government, but to go in unilaterally would cause a lot of problems about their borders, might cause Musahreff to fall and would lead to Islamisits coming to power in a nation with nuclear weapons.
If we figure out he is riding in a car down a road in Afghanistan we can put a hellfire missle on him in an instant. Hence, he probably will not go anywhere near the Afghani border.
Are we still looking for him? Is he still a threat? Why can't we find him? Any thoughts?
Interesting question..Haven't heard anything about him in awhile...
I don't care if he's alive or dead, as long as we're killing large quantities of his minions, associates, and well-wishers. My fear is that if we do kill him, there will be a temptation to call an end to the hunt for other al Qaeda goons. So yeah, as Michael said, he is more useful alive. But I hope we kill him eventually.
Bush pulled the teams that were hunting him out and closed down the operations to find him years ago.
America is stepping up its hunt for Osama bin Laden by dispatching additional CIA operatives and paramilitary officers to Pakistan to kill or capture the al-Qa'eda leader.
Osama bin Laden is believed to be hiding in the Pakistani region bordering Afghanistan
US officials said that the mission is intended to intensify the pressure on the terrorist leader, who turns 50 tomorrow, and perhaps force him into making a mistake. He is widely believed to be hiding in the region bordering Afghanistan.
Satellite photographs and details of communications intercepts were given to President Musharraf of Pakistan last week by Stephen Kappes, deputy director of the CIA, as part of a strategy to persuade him to give US intelligence agencies more assistance.
Mr Kappes, a Middle East specialist who has served in Pakistan, travelled to Islamabad to brief Gen Musharraf along with Vice President Dick Cheney. His detailed presentation showed evidence of al-Qa'eda building its strength on Pakistani soil.
"Reports that the trail has gone stone cold are not correct," an American official said afterwards. "We are very much increasing our efforts there."
Speak of the Devil.
I do not know how reliable this newspaper is. But it does seem to paint a picture quite different from what some have tried to say here.
You can read the rest by following the link.
That's not what the democrats thinkand one man is not at the root cause of our problems ....
For the record, I, although completely uninformed on the matter, am by no means working under the assumption that Mr. Bin Laden is in Pakistan, or the Afghanistan mountains bordering Pakistan. I think it is just as likely that he could be in Indonesia. With more than 1 billion Muslem's on the planet, there are probably many places where he could be.
As the article hinted, some reports in US Intelligence have reported that Bin Laden's trail has gone "stone cold" ... meaning our intelligence officials have no idea where he is.
At best, I am thinking its a 50/50 shot that he is in the mountains of Pakistan.
The Indonesia idea is only appealing if you believe that all muslims support terrorists and would not report him if he was spotted. If you think that there are muslims who do not automatically support terrorism, then you have to think about where Osama would stand out the most and be more likely reported. And an arab like him in a sea of Asian faces without the ablity to speak the locla language would be a great challenge.
The bad lands of Pakistan are not safe because everyone is Muslim. It is a safe place because;
1- there is virtually no central goverenment presence.
2- the people there are widly independent and resent the central government.
3- The people there have fiercely loyal ties to the Taliban through their shared tribe affiliation of Pashtum. And since Osama is buds with the Taliban, the loyality passes off to him as well.
None of these things are true in Indonesia. Unlike the bad lands of Pakistan, people in Indonesia can call the government and have a battalion on the ground in a few hours, if not less. There is no free areas where they can act openly. The terrorist attacks like the Bali bombing are urban operations and they have to hide in the populace. Experts are not even certain that there has been any face to face meetings in the last few years between anyone in Osama's circle and Indonesia. There are areas of Thailand and the Philipines where there are "no go" areas for the government and groups with known ties to Osama operating.
But the trouble is how likely would Osama be to move himself away from control like that? He loves setting himself up as the head of a movement. Thsoe statements he sends out would have to travel a long way to reach an office of Al jeezera without attracting attention. And they, and other messages, would have to be hand carried. Any electronic communication will be found by the NSA.
And how can the most wanted and known criminal in the world make the journy without being caught? Especially when you consider his medical problems. Do a google search. There is serious consideration that he is unable to walk anymore. He always sits in his filmed statements and the scenes of him walking in them seem to be years old. How can he move very far?
Pakistan is by far the most likely place.
The Indonesia idea is only appealing if you believe that all muslims support terrorists and would not report him if he was spotted. If you think that there are muslims who do not automatically support terrorism, then you have to think about where Osama would stand out the most and be more likely reported. And an arab like him in a sea of Asian faces without the ablity to speak the locla language would be a great challenge.
The bad lands of Pakistan are not safe because everyone is Muslim. It is a safe place because;
1- there is virtually no central goverenment presence.
2- the people there are widly independent and resent the central government.
3- The people there have fiercely loyal ties to the Taliban through their shared tribe affiliation of Pashtum. And since Osama is buds with the Taliban, the loyality passes off to him as well.
None of these things are true in Indonesia. Unlike the bad lands of Pakistan, people in Indonesia can call the government and have a battalion on the ground in a few hours, if not less. There is no free areas where they can act openly. The terrorist attacks like the Bali bombing are urban operations and they have to hide in the populace. Experts are not even certain that there has been any face to face meetings in the last few years between anyone in Osama's circle and Indonesia. There are areas of Thailand and the Philipines where there are "no go" areas for the government and groups with known ties to Osama operating.
But the trouble is how likely would Osama be to move himself away from control like that? He loves setting himself up as the head of a movement. Thsoe statements he sends out would have to travel a long way to reach an office of Al jeezera without attracting attention. And they, and other messages, would have to be hand carried. Any electronic communication will be found by the NSA.
And how can the most wanted and known criminal in the world make the journy without being caught? Especially when you consider his medical problems. Do a google search. There is serious consideration that he is unable to walk anymore. He always sits in his filmed statements and the scenes of him walking in them seem to be years old. How can he move very far?
Pakistan is by far the most likely place.
Don Roley,
I do not believe it takes 1 billion people to hide one person.
I think that argument is silly on its face.