Tough to practice with the bag supported like that.
is that statistic verifiable ,Oldest trick in the book: Jab, right hand. Yet it accounts for at least half of the KOs at all levels.
Even as with the jab as a feint, the one-two does the trick, if you have a good right hand.
is that statistic verifiable ,
from casusal observation is doesnt seem true at elite heavy weight level, where they tend to go down under a flurry of punches rather than the old one two
i asked for a verfication of the statisicic that it counts for more than 50 % of kbock outs, AT ALL LEVELS,that many 10,of 1000 of contest, showing two examples doesnt come close to doing that.
i asked for a verfication of the statisicic that it counts for more than 50 % of kbock outs, AT ALL LEVELS,that many 10,of 1000 of contest, showing two examples doesnt come close to doing that.
thats the whole evidence by selective viewing of you tube thing that happens on here quite a lot
if its true fine, il stand corrected, but you need actual evidence for that to happen, like say DATA
i mean lets start easy, did you get the figure from a reliable source or just make it up
the faxt youve now changed the whoke context if the claim leads me to conclude you just made it up in the first placeIf not the actual KO then the knockdown and follow up when it's just a matter of finishing the job
so made up claim then, ? thats ok then, at least we kbow it was opinion maskerading as factThis isn't tennis. There is no database for such things. You know it by watching enough fights
the faxt youve now changed the whoke context if the claim leads me to conclude you just made it up in the first place
if you saying that most knock out start with someone throwing a jab, thats seems plausible
only if your using a made up defintion of accountsMy original statement was "accounts for", which is compatible with that as well.
so made up claim then, ? thats ok then, at least we kbow it was opinion maskerading as fact
if that was reasonable you could also say" leaving the dressing room accounts for 100% of all koMy original statement was "accounts for", which is compatible with that as well.
mNot anymore than my claim that most Hollywood actresses have plastic surgeries. There's more things to life than databases.
so that would mean most actresses that have ever appeared on set have had cometic surgury, that again runs ibto 10, of thousands, have you seen the size of the crowd in antony and Cleopatra ,Not anymore than my claim that most Hollywood actresses have plastic surgeries. There's more things to life than databases.
Tough to practice with the bag supported like that. The jab never touched the bag.
Even this is debatable. FWIW, I've tried looking into what punches cause what % of knockouts, and similar data in the past with no luck. It's weird to me since they take data from each match, but somehow no one (as far as I can tell) has done any sort of mass analysis of that data. Or if they have, they're keeping it secret. If you (or anyone else) could find that data I'd appreciate it.the faxt youve now changed the whoke context if the claim leads me to conclude you just made it up in the first place
if you saying that most knock out start with someone throwing a jab, thats seems plausible
it wouldnt be the hardest thing to access all the heavy weight championship fights since 1970s and watch them, with an eye on the lead up to any kbock out, but are you including only spark out on the floor or tkosEven this is debatable. FWIW, I've tried looking into what punches cause what % of knockouts, and similar data in the past with no luck. It's weird to me since they take data from each match, but somehow no one (as far as I can tell) has done any sort of mass analysis of that data. Or if they have, they're keeping it secret. If you (or anyone else) could find that data I'd appreciate it.
@Acronym So just for clarity, for the jab to account for the KO, does that mean the jab has to land? If I throw a jab and he ducks into my uppercut, does that mean it accounts for the KO? What about if I hit with a jab, he stumbles, then I follow up with a combo that results in a KO? Or a 4-5 combo where a job is anywhere involved? I'm fine with any use of account, just want to make sure we're all on the same page for that.
@Acronym So just for clarity, for the jab to account for the KO, does that mean the jab has to land? If I throw a jab and he ducks into my uppercut, does that mean it accounts for the KO? What about if I hit with a jab, he stumbles, then I follow up with a combo that results in a KO? Or a 4-5 combo where a job is anywhere involved? I'm fine with any use of account, just want to make sure we're all on the same page for that.