brokenbonz said:
definiteley post, this is all interesting infos hard to obtain anywhere!
This is meant to serve as a brief overview of Thai (here in after interchangeable with “Siam”) history, in an attempt to discuss the history of Muay Thai. Muay Thai’s history is a little hard to pin down sometimes, and thus, there is a lot of misconception and misinformation being passed around, that doesn’t necessarily comply with the history of the region. This misinformation appears to be product of several things–discussed later–but, primarily, due to the Thai’s relentless devotion to its Nation. You will see, later, how nationalism will effect, not only the Thai people, but the way they choose to present their history.
Before Thailand, before Bangkok, before Siam, and before Ayutthaya, the earliest forms of language/writing were
Mon and
Khmer, adapted from southern Indian scripts. The area of Mon is in modern Burma (Myanmar), and Khmer is in modern day Cambodia. Because Thailand was such dense forest, people settled along the coast line and the river basins. The first influx of settlers came around the time of the bronze age (2500 BCE), and again in the iron age (500 BCE). The first group of people in the area are known as the Mon-Khmer group (“Thai”). The first main settlements were in the Chaophraya basin (central Thailand) and the Lower Mekong basin (Cambodia).
The next known language, Tai, is supposed to have originated from south of the Yangzi River, as the Han Chinese spread into the area in sixth century BCE. In his book,
A History of Thailand, Chris Baker explains that:
[the Chinese] probably took with them some expertise in growing rice using the water from mountain streams. . .[the Thai] may also have acquired some martial skills from their encounters with the Chinese because other peoples saw [the Thai] as fierce warriors. Some of the earlier, mainly Mon-Khmer inhabitants retreated upwards into the hills. Others co-existed with this farmer-warrior elite, often adopting a Tai language and gradually losing their own separate identity.
Chiang Mai, in the Lanna region, was founded by a Tai prince with Mon-Khmer blood. The Mueang Nua region, or ‘northern cities,’ was founded by Tai confederations, which included Sukhothai. Finally, the areas in the Chaophraya basin, including Ayutthaya, were founded under Khmer (“Cambodian”) influence (Baker). Ayutthaya emerged as the dominant city in the late 1300s, and the region was coined the
Xian region, by the Chinese, which the Portugese later interpreted as
Siam. To review, the Tai/Mon-Khmer (Burmese and Cambodian, primarily, with Chinese blood) settled in Lanna, the Tai (Chinese, primarily, and Mon-Khmer) settled in the Mueang Nua region, and the Khmer (Cambodian)settled in the region of Siam. This information will play an important role when we look at the influences on the various styles of Muay Thai.
We will fast-forward here, a little. Late 1400s Mueang Nua has come under AyutthayaÂ’s control; with Phitsanulok serving as AyutthayaÂ’s second capitol, mostly as a post in the wars with Lanna over Chiang Mai. Ayutthaya succeeds after many long battles, enslaving Chiang Mai and abolishing all weapons (which is why LannaÂ’s Muay Thai is rumored to be the more extensive style). The regionÂ’s economy is based solely on trade with, primarily the Chinese, but also with India, Persia the Malay archipelago and the Portugese. The three main ports in the region are Pegu, in Burma, Lawaek-Udong in the Mekong Delta (Cambodia), and Ayutthaya, in Siam; all three competed to control the interior resources or trade with China. The Portugese brought Siam cannons and, eventually, muskets, which they used to conquer and place a puppet king in Khmer (Cambodia). The Burmese, however, joined with the Nobles of old in the Lanna and Mueang Nua and brought Ayutthaya down in 1559, taking a young Ayutthayan prince, Naresuan (Baker).
The role of Naresuan is of utmost importance to the Thai people. Naresuan escaped Burma, returned to Ayutthaya, and spent most of his fifteen year rein as king involved in military campaigns against the Burmese to re-establish Ayutthaya’s dominance. Naresuan is the first of the “warrior-kings,” establishing this as a tradition for Siamese/Thai culture. Naresuan is glamorized for his success against the Burmese, and his expertise in Krabi Krabong, which will become the standard form of close-range fighting in the Siamese military. These wars ended in a stalemate, forcing the area into peace. Trade resumed, and expanded; and during the seventeenth century, Chinese, Viet, Cham, Mon, Portugese, Arab, Indian, Persian, Japanese, groups from the Archipelago, Dutch, French and English settlements were established in Ayutthaya and the southern peninsula.
It is during this time, most likely, that feats of–what is now traditional–armed and unarmed combat were performed. Because of the peace, various regions, both Siamese and external, would have competed to demonstrate their martial ability. In fact, within Siam, it was how nobles, military personnel, and kings were chosen.
Those with a chance to ascend the throne had to have royal blood and preferably be closely related to the previous monarch. . .each succession was a trial of strength, usually involving the previous kingÂ’s brothers and sons. In a martial era, such a contest made sense as a way to select a warrior-king. . .[t]hese contests began with a miniature civil war fought in the centre of the capitol, and ended with wholesale purges of the nobles who backed the wrong side and of male royal relatives who might want to renew the contest at some later date (Baker).
The politics of the monarchy, after this point, begin to alienate, not only the people, but the nobles, as well. The monarchy adopts a Hindu facade, while the people, and even the monarchy themselves, are Theravada Buddhists. The Sangha, or monastic society, gained power, and developed a system of checks-and-balances with the monarchy. Trade brings riches, thus, a more relaxed, non-martial-oriented era, where high taxes and easy trade-affairs jobs meant that people would no longer perform their mandatory, semi-annual military duty. After more than 150 years of relative peace, the Burmese surprised Siam with its military attack, and completely demolished Ayutthaya, burning everything to the ground. The fall of Ayutthaya brought an end to the “old martial era” (Baker).
Here, I will shift, and address some of the information Muay Thai camps are producing.
Sangha Muay Thai camp in Lanna’s Chiang Mai, offers information on Muay Thai Boran, or “Ancient Thai Boxing.” I use this site, because it is the site I see used most frequently presented as solid historical information on Muay Thai. The synopsis of history on the site, verbatim, reads:
It is believed that the Siamese people had their own styles of fighting, in each Kingdom a different style. These fighting systems have clearly been evolving for many hundreds of years and have been known under many different names such as; "Arwut Thai" (meaning Thai Weapons), "Pahuyut" (armed, unarmed combat).
Much later, at the end of the Ayuthaya Period, or around the beginning of the Thonburi Period after a long history of fighting against the Burmese, King Phra Thaksin "The Great" finally pushed all invaders from the Kingdoms of Siam and with this the Chakri dynasty began. The Chakri dynasty with King Rama I on the throne, marked a period when nearly all of the separate Kingdoms of Siam joined together to become the country we now know as Thailand.
At the end of the 1700's, with wars against invaders over, fighters began to compete locally, and often in front of the King to see who had the best style. Most people recognize this period in the history of Muay Thai as fighters used to wrap their hands in cotton twine. Today, people refer to this style of fighting (during this period) as "Muay Kaat Chueak" although at the time, this isn't the term people used. "Muay Kaat Chueak" began to decline around the 1920's, finally ending in 1929 with a death in the ring.
This is where Nationalism effects the presentation of Thai history. First, it states around the end of Ayutthaya,
or the beginning of the Thonburi era, Taksin pushed the invaders from Siam. Actually, Taksin
is the Thonburi period. Phaya Taksin’s “origins are obscure,” says Baker; he is most likely the offspring of a Teochiu Chinese migrant gambler and his Thai wife, who, herself, is most likely a mix of Thai and Chinese. Taksin is suspected to have bribed his way into governorship of the town of Tak, prior to establishing a new capitol in Thonburi, across the river from Bangkok. Taksin had no claims to the throne, but is credited with the revival of the warrior-king tradition, and brought back a militarized society; except that he surrounded himself with Chinese, not Siamese, “personnel,” for lack of further explanation (Bangkok was a Chinese trading settlement). In the end of the eighteenth century, Taksin lead a military expedition into the Lanna and peninsula regions of Siam, driving the Burmese out of both regions and reestablishing Siam, once again.
Taksin appointed two generals, first, Bunma, a descendent of the old Mon nobility, and then Bunma’s older brother, Thongduang. The two were Taksin’s most successful generals. Thongduang came to represent the old Mon nobility, that had been excluded from Taksin’s monarchy; the Mon nobility staged a coup, because of Taksin’s ethnicity, disregard for the Sangha, and forcing the nobility into the military. Taksin was executed in 1782, and Thongduang–himself of Chinese decent, although less–sat on the throne as King Yotfa, also known as Rama I. The capitol was moved across the river to Bangkok (then still a Chinese trade settlement). Thongduang’s title as minister of the military was “Chakri,” thus, it became the name of the new dynasty.
In Sangha’s depiction, all participants are portrayed as being Siamese, when in fact, during the period they are referring to, the major players were of Chinese descent, dealing with Chinese, to promote and reestablish Chinese trade. The new king, while presented by the Mon nobility, was also Chinese, and built the new Siamese capital out of a Chinese settlement. Moreover, during this period–Thonburi/Chakri–there was constant military occupation, restoring the population of Siam by forcing people of subsequently conquered regions outside of Siam (Burma, Cambodia and Laos) to populate Siam. The regions were not “joined,” as Sangha depicts, they were inducted; and Siam was not redefined and established as Thailand until 1939, certainly not in the early 1800s, as Sangha is presenting it. It should be noted that the majority of the population in Siam, were not of Siamese descent.
It is more likely that traditional forms of Thai combat were performed during the period of peace, beginning under King Naresuan, and ending with the fall of Ayutthaya. The logic here is that, during the Chakri Dynasty, the influence on martial arts would have been primarily Chinese, mixed with arts from Burma, Lao, Khmer and Viet, not to mention the influence of the Malay archipelago–including Indonesia, the Portugese, Dutch, French and English traders would have had on Siamese military tactics. Thus, if the Muay Thai of this period is being presented as ancient Muay Thai, based solely on Siamese developed military tactics, it is quite safe to assume that the assertion is not accurate. It most certainly does not coincide with historical accounts and logical conclusions based on those historical accounts.