arnisandyz
Master Black Belt
Which do you prefer and why? I'll post my experiences later, I want to here what you folks think about it first.
Tulisan said:Might as well start practicing Iso if your not already, because most likely that's what your going to do in a gunfight anyways regardless of what you train or are "used too" on the range.
Paul
I totally agree with Mr Tulisan. IPSC is not real gunfighting. I bet that if, god forbid, you ever get in one you will go MI. I have read a lot about the way people who only shot weaver almost always went iso when the **** hit the fan. I hav also read that a lot depends on if you are suprised when attacked or if you already had the gun out and were ready.rschoon said:I disagree with this statement. We will do what we train. I use weaver in IPSC although MI is probable faster. I do this for 2 reasons. 1, I have been shooting for about 30 years and well...old dog new tricks 2, I have been doing Kenpo for about 15 years and it fits right into the nuetral bow stance. At this point I haven't even tried to change it. I have also been in a couple real life gun encounters and I am positive that I used weaver. (Not 100% but pretty sure anyway.)
Blotan Hunka said:I totally agree with Mr Tulisan. IPSC is not real gunfighting. I bet that if, god forbid, you ever get in one you will go MI. I have read a lot about the way people who only shot weaver almost always went iso when the **** hit the fan. I hav also read that a lot depends on if you are suprised when attacked or if you already had the gun out and were ready.
arnisandyz said:I like to think of Weaver and Modern Iso as "reference points", as there are many positions that can/do happen in between the two positions that don't neccisarily have a name.