Evolving Your Art: Is It Necessary?

Yari

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 1, 2002
Messages
1,364
Reaction score
22
Location
Århus, Denmark
Theres alot of talk about the art evovling, like it was something living.... But's it's not.

An art only exsist in 1 person, and no other. You can find simularities in a group of people that are very munch in common, and therefor can postulate that they are doing the same thing. You can also postualate that a person can learn to do the "same" as the group/individual.

Since each person has his own history/karma (what ever), the things they do and teach will differ, from the original start. This is invedible(sp?).

Part of a persons teaching are the both conscious and unconscioud. For both: the teacher and the pupil.

And that learning is a question of what the pupil whants/can learn.

In a sense, the person learning decides what the art is for him, but he's not receiving th art. It's not jumping over to him. It's something he's doing to himself(and choosing concsoius/unconcsius which parts he wants to learn).
To put it in other words: The art is dead. long live the art.....!

Hope you get what I'm trying to say.... argumenting in english isn't my speciality.

/Yari
 
Top