shihansmurf
Black Belt
A long test where endurance and will power is not neccessarily dangerous. Not allowing water breaks is, and putting people through it that aren't ready for it is, but done with safety in mind and proper preperation its not a life threatening experience.
As for what can be tested in 4 hours that can't be test in 45 minutes. Well, what can be tested in a full marathon compared to a quarter marathon? The techniques used in that event are far less complex and with far fewer of them. In fact, why don't I just run half a block and call it a day, multply the time out to cover the whole distance and call that my full marathon time?
Because its not the same, running half a block when you are fresh is one thing, continuing to run 4 hours later is a entirely different thing.
Good analogy.
However, distance running and fighting are very different sports that require different rubrics to measure proficiency. Distance running requires a lower output of energy over a long time whereas fighting is typicaly a short duration, high energy output event. I would think that sprinting would be more appropriate.
I understand the need for stressful, scenario based self defense training. I understand the need to condition students. I'm not entirely sure that I agree that it should be a required portion of grading. My teacher requires that we perform a conditioning test before a rank test, as a result I do the same. It is an ongoing point of contention between he and I. I feel that a grading should be about skill at martial arts. I don't think it should be about
how well performing other sports or activities.
For example I wouldn't make promotion to brown belt dependent upon a student's ability to cook an omlette. I have never required my black belt candidates to build a bookshelf. I am training martial artists, not chef's nor carpenters.
I don't make my students write reports for belt rank. I am not an English teacher and they signed up for Karate not Comp101. I sure don't make them teach as a rank requirement. If they want to be instructors than they learn to teach, but that is on them. I am not the dean of a teaching college and they signed up for karate, not coaching classes.
To summarize, I think that karate tests should be about how well one perform karate. I think gymnastics (XMA, I'm looking at you here..), dance choreography(Musical forms and, again with the XMA), term papers, repetitions of religeous mantra, and the like belong elsewhere.
Just my view
Mark
As an addendum, I actually have no problem with the XMA thing, as long as XMA isn't being passed off as practical fighting skills. Those folks have simply evolved tournament karate to the level that is was already going and should be commended for pushing the envelope of that particular sport. It just isn't for me.