Thrice d**ned shaky cam

Sukerkin

Have the courage to speak softly
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
15,325
Reaction score
493
Location
Staffordshire, England
I do have to agree, Billi :nods:. The only unsteady cam film I've ever really liked was Charlie Mopic. That was because it was supposed to be a handheld camera in the era before steadycam technology and so it worked wonderfully as a story telling device of a cameraman following a squad in the Vietnam war. Even there is wasn't overdone (that I recall ... I really must watch that film again, it was very good).
 

zDom

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
3,081
Reaction score
110
Shaky cam is crap.

It has ruined more movies for me than I care to count.

I want to punch the guy who invented it and every filmmaker who has used it since then.

And then punch them again with a camera placed firmly on a tripod and panned back far enough so I can watch the video over and over again and see his head snap back at the impact of my fist.

Damn it a fourth and fifth time.
 

Phenix_Rider

Orange Belt
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Y'all are just getting old LOL. It's supposed to immerse you in the action and help the suspension of disbelief. It works in war movies. Do you really want everything to stay perfectly still and composed in frame when a grenade goes off behind you or a missile hits a car down the street or the hero runs the gauntlet?

At any rate, shaky cam is far less irritating than the 3D fad.
 

zDom

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
3,081
Reaction score
110
Y'all are just getting old LOL. It's supposed to immerse you in the action and help the suspension of disbelief.

I know what it is SUPPOSED to do. What it actually DOES is make it so the audience is unable to see fight sequences.





It works in war movies. Do you really want everything to stay perfectly still and composed in frame when a grenade goes off behind you or a missile hits a car down the street or the hero runs the gauntlet?

In moderation, maybe. And just maybe. It has been overdone so much over the last five years or so that you can't tell what is even happening in action scenes. What is the point of watching an action movie if you can't SEE the action?

Some jackass did too much coke and thought "if a little camera shake is good, MORE must be BETTER!!" (snoooooooort....shakeshakeshakeshakeshakeshakeshakeshakeshakeshakeshakeshake)

At any rate, shaky cam is far less irritating than the 3D fad.

Um, no. 3D is always optional. Shaky cam is ruining movies and there is no "unshaken" versions out there to watch if that is my preference — which it IS.
 

Archangel M

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
154
I seem to recall that it was innovative and interesting when I saw Saving Private Ryan. Then it seemed like everybody was doing it.
 
OP
B

billc

Grandmaster
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
9,183
Reaction score
85
Location
somewhere near Lake Michigan
Once is unique and interesting, when everyone is doing it, it is boring and in the case of shaky cam, annoying. Going back to real camera work is being "retro." Let's go back to retro, and relive the old days.
 

Big Don

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
10,551
Reaction score
190
Location
Sanger CA
Do you really want everything to stay perfectly still and composed in frame when a grenade goes off behind you or a missile hits a car down the street or the hero runs the gauntlet?
Yes! I want a godlike view. Shaky cam doesn't add realism, unless you run through life in a constant gran mal seizure.
Bill, your count is off. Way more than thrice damned
 

zDom

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
3,081
Reaction score
110
I seem to recall that it was innovative and interesting when I saw Saving Private Ryan. Then it seemed like everybody was doing it.

It was well done in that movie: it did give a "first person in the midst of a chaotic cluster**** landing" feel.

And you could still make out who was doing what in the action.

The first shaky-cam (+ too darky cam!) film I recall seeing that really left me upset that I couldn't see the action is Batman. Then I remember the James Bond movie shaking the camera so much during the opening car chase scene I was turning to my brothers going, "WTF just happened? I couldn't see jack****!"
 
OP
B

billc

Grandmaster
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
9,183
Reaction score
85
Location
somewhere near Lake Michigan
Here is another thing that drives me nuts, extreme, extreme close ups, of both regular scenes but especially fight scenes. I want to actually see what is going on, without getting sea sick or thinking that I am watching the movie through a cardboard, paper towel roll.
 

Latest Discussions

Top