Kung fu in MMA Wins

That's how the modern MA are, they learn from each other, they improve. NOT LIKE those kung fu. When kung fu got their butt handed to them, they make excuses " I don't want to use it as it's too deadly"!! " I don't want to use it because it's our secret". All the excuses and excuses.

You really need to live in Hong Kong and China to hear all the BS from those so called masters.

This is 21century, people actually open their eyes to learn what's work and what's BS. Like MMA, they put their ego aside, when they see something good, they learn it. That's why they call MMA, just pick the ones that work.........TKD kicks( yes TKD kicks, not chinese kicks), Boxing hands, Muy Thai elbows and knees, Gracie BJJ and wrestling. Nothing learning from monkey scratching their hand in the middle of the fight. Nothing wobbling around pretend to be drunk during the fight. Modern fighting arts cut out all those BS.

Martial Arts is the ART of kicking butts. You want grace and beauty, learn ballet.
There you go again, trying to tell people what they do, and you have no first hand experience with it. Give it a rest.
 
Watch UFC, they use boxing hands to punch, Muy Thai elbows and knee, TKD kicks and Gracie BJJ and wrestling for grappling and ground work. It can be chased back to the origin.
Which origins? Different people developed similar techniques independently. You think these things each came from one single source?
 
You' would be surprise at how accurate you can be when dealing with moving components and changing distances. All combat sports have examples of well timed punches that are accurate and intentional. In comparison to what other's do. Landing a punch or kick where you want it is much easier.


Fairly consistent accuracy here.

I don't know of any sport that requires precision as much as basketball. No look passes must not only get to your team mate but it must be able to avoid capture or interference by other team mates. They not only calculate distance and speed from the same team they also calculate the movements from the other team.

Our brains are extremely amazing don't sell yours short. If you keep thinking that precision in fighting isn't possible then your fighting skills will suffer. If you don't think precision is possible then you should abandon martial arts because the only other side to precision is, randomly swing your arms and kick your legs and hope you hit something.
If that was true fights would all be over pretty fast. Yet they aren't.
 
But it is happening more now than before. Big wheel punches, oblique kicks. As fighters are getting used to the common techniques, we start to see them look for new techniques that people aren't used to dealing with. Nothing unicorn about it.
Sigh
 
I asked if the technique was found in kung fu.
You use a low inside crescent kick to block the incoming kick, you then change your inside crescent kick into a knee level (or groin level) side kick. This is the basic long fist kicking training that I learned when I was 14 during my 1st month of my long fist class.

24_kick_1.gif
 
Last edited:
You use a low inside crescent kick to block the incoming kick, you then change your inside crescent kick into a knee level (or groin level) side kick. This is the basic long fist kicking training that I learned when I was 14 during my 1st month of my long fist class.

View attachment 27238
I once tried to learn karate from pictures. It was the most difficult thing ha ha ha. But I'm glad I can understand it now. lol.
 
Thread title "Kung Fu in MMA wins"

Clickbait
ha ha ha. mad because you clicked? or mad because you dont' agree? lol

Not saying that you are wrong about that. Just curious. Click bait or not it has lead to a good discussion.

Side kick

Jung Ga: Round house kick , side kick 1996. Good ole punch from a mile out demo lol.

Jow Ga Side kick

Choy li Fut round house kick

crane side kick. I don't know what this is but it's got a side kick
 
It is going to hurt when people realise MMA does kung fu better
ha ha ha. mad because you clicked? or mad because you dont' agree? lol

Not saying that you are wrong about that. Just curious. Click bait or not it has lead to a good discussion.

Side kick

Jung Ga: Round house kick , side kick 1996. Good ole punch from a mile out demo lol.

Jow Ga Side kick

Choy li Fut round house kick

crane side kick. I don't know what this is but it's got a side kick

Cool. Where are the traditional Kung Fu exponents in MMA?
 
What are you going on about? I never claimed TKD does not have these kicks. I only corrected your claim that kung fu does not. We do.
You have evidence from before Bruce Lee days kung fu already have these kicks. I am not a historian, maybe you can educate me. I just know TKD is recognized and respected for these kicks, in teaching and Olympics.

Like I said, I've seen a lot of kung fu demo and movies in hong kong, I have friends that were very into it that time and showed my their kung fu. Those kicks were NOT known until Bruce Lee.
 
One should never use a cross as his 1st punch.

It's not a definite No. You can use it as your first punch, if for example, I use my lead hand (mirrored stance) to control my opponent's lead hand. I can use my lead hand to move your lead hand towards your center toward your punching arm and move to the outside of that lead hand then I can successfully use that reverse punch.

But as shown in that demo video. I wouldn't punch from a mile out and definitely not with a rear punch. If I want my first punch to be a reverse punch then my lead hand must clear the way. In terms of attacking with punching. The demo is not a direct visual of how those techniques would go down. For me that video is more of a concept video than an application video. Kicking to the ribs or abdomen while your opponent is punching is a concept.
 
the lack of ground fighting pretty much murders it in the crib in terms of crossover potential.
Some how, the Kung Fu community seems to be very stubborn and too much pride. 30 years after Gracie whoop their butt, they still don't want to learn take down defense. If they learn take down defense, they can have a chance to go back to the UFC and show case.

They should have open mind and be humble enough to admit their short coming and learn. Like my school in the 80s, the school teach very little of traditional TKD, we forgo the wide horsestand, big stepping one step at a time those USELESS moves, punching from the hip all that stupid yesterdecade moves, learning from Bruce Lee, front leg round and side kicks, boxing hands........ We practice forms........TWO WEEKS before the belt test, then forget it right afterwards.

We concentrated on actual kicking on the pad while the partner holding it so one can get the feel of the kick, the other can get used to being kicked to the stomach and chest(through the bag). This is progress. The instructor never claim that is traditional TKD, he pretty much glorified Bruce Lee with a big picture of Lee hanging.

Maybe the Kung fu school has more open mind and humble in US, sure NOT in hong kong. They only know to bad mouth instead of changing and invalidate others..............OR say they have that too, that they just don't use it.



When I saw UFC I, 2 and 3, I said S*&%, what should I do?!!! I immediately start learning Iron Palm of Kung Fu thinking if that works, that would be the answer to the tackling. Their bad is exposed and I can iron palm the back and hurt the guy...............THEN I got fooled by the lies of iron palm that only gave me two carpal tunnels.
 
What your system is known for does not void what your system trains. Jow Ga is known for their lion dance. Does that eans everything else they train is void?

TKD is known for kicks. Does that mean the jabs the train are void?
No, that's a good thing, BUT we don't claim TKD has boxing hands and dance like boxing too, we give credit to Bruce Lee and boxing. Our teacher was so humble that he actually invited a Jujitsu instructor to come every other month and taught us some Jujitsu. This is 1984, almost 10 years before Gracie BJJ conquered the whole MA scene ing UFC.

Be humble, do NOT take credit if it is not true. This is what I HATE about those so called "masters" of kung fu in Hong Kong. I hope in US, they learn to have an open mind and be humble like my school. Know your limits, LEARN instead of invalidating other styles.

What is MMA.......MIXED Martial Arts.....Emphasize MIXED. They admit at the very first word it's MIXED.
 
Last edited:
It's not a definite No. You can use it as your first punch, if for example, I use my lead hand (mirrored stance) to control my opponent's lead hand.
If you use your leading hand to control my leading arm, your cross will not be your 1st move, but your 2nd move. When you do that, none of these could happen in this clip.

It's good to train partner drill. But it's not good to train unrealistic partner drill.

In wrestling, it's very difficult to be able to control your opponent's

- leading leg, and
- back arm,

at the same time.

An initial cross just give you that opportunity.

 
Last edited:
Some how, the Kung Fu community seems to be very stubborn and too much pride. 30 years after Gracie whoop their butt, they still don't want to learn take down defense.
How much CMA have you trained?

CMA has as much take down defense as Judo, wrestling, and BJJ have.

As far as I know, BJJ is not interested in take down defense training.

 
How much CMA have you trained?

CMA has as much take down defense as Judo, wrestling, and BJJ have.

Yet not enough to stop an actual takedown.

As far as I know, BJJ is not interested in take down defense training.


Well yeah, because it’s more efficient/important to deal with what happens after getting taken down.

It reminds me of a vid of Marcelo Garcia going against one of those Kung fu exponents who are supposedly hard to take down. Garcia took him down rather quickly. Since resisting the takedown was the core of his grappling knowledge, once Garcia got him on the floor Mr. Kung Fu really didn’t know what to do afterwards.
 
If you use your leading hand to control my leading arm, your cross will not be your 1st move, but your 2nd move. When you do that, none of these could happen in this clip.
You can still do what is shown in the clip. Step parry to the outside of a punch and kick to the abdomen. That's totally do able. In theory the 45 degree step to the outside is all that you need. In actual practice, the lead hand parry followed by a kick will be able to control that lead hand before it gets the punch off. Which is the correct way to do that technique.

I do agree with you that the partner drill should be realistic, but that's a demo so I don't see it as a drill. I see it as concept. This is how I read the first technique concept demo. Concept: Step to the outside of the punch and kick under punch.

Actual technique. Keep your lead hand up to address your opponent's lead hand guard to prevent the punch from having a clean launch. The 45 degree off center step and your lead hand move at the same time. As you step off center use your lead hand guard to help ensure that any attempt by your opponent to launch a lead punch will be redirected with your lead hand. In this scenario redirected simply means denying the punch a linear path to your face. You do not wait for the punch but attack the lead guard with the understanding that your movements will trigger your opponent's lead punch. The off center step has to happen at the same time as your lead hand addresses your opponent's effort, or will to punch you with that lead hand.

If your opponent gets the punch started then use your lead hand to prevent the punches traveling a linear path to your face. By the time this action occurs, your stepping foot should have root allowing you to kick under the punch. If your get to your opponents lead hand before the punch launches then pin that hand against your opponents body giving you the option to follow up with a reverse punch during the pinning or a different kick to the knee or leg of your opponent.

The 45 degree off angle step should naturally cause your opponent's eyes to follow the larger body mass and ignore the kick.. What I described is a possible application of what was shown as a concept.

Concepts demos are very general. They show an idea but not a true application. They often leave out the important bits. Those who are familiar concepts will be able to fill in the important parts. I can't tell you right now that using that concept as an "step for step" application without adding important parts will get you knocked out. The purpose of the video "I hope" was to show the concepts of the various types of kicks. If they thought they were showing applications then they were fooling themselves.

Here's an example of concept of a flying car. Very general. It leaves out the details that make it work. If you don't know the important parts that makes this concept work, then you'll either won't fly, or you'll kill yourself trying.
1631067697501.png
 
Back
Top