kicks..

mantis

Master Black Belt
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
1,488
Reaction score
5
Location
SoCal
it's best to ask the kind TKD people
now when i hear the names of kicks i dont recognize the kicks... is there any place you know of that lists the name of the kick and how it looks like... coz i might know the kicks in diff lang!

thanx
 
That is tedious, but a good reference. Thanks for posting that.
 
That is a super reference TX BB.

How about for ITF'ers...is there something similar as your terminology can be slightly different (I recall "turning kick" for "roundhouse kick", etc.)?

TIA!

Miles
 
FearlessFreep said:
Thanks for that link.

I was pleasently surprised to see knee strikes in there.
Jay,

May I ask why you were surprised to see knee kicks?

FWIW-This is actually the first technique we do in each of my classes-it is part of the warm-up, but I tell the students that it is one of the strongest techniques to use in close quarters.

Miles
 
Miles said:
Jay,

May I ask why you were surprised to see knee kicks?

FWIW-This is actually the first technique we do in each of my classes-it is part of the warm-up, but I tell the students that it is one of the strongest techniques to use in close quarters.

Miles
im not in place to answer for Jay but i would think it's because of a stereotypical image people have about TKD featuring high kicks, no knees, no hand works!
 
Well, I've done knee strikes in self defense, but we haven't really done them as a general purpose technique. For example, we practice sidekicks as a technique. We use sidekicks as part of self-defense, we use sidekicks for sparring, we use sidekicks in forms. I've used knee kicks in self-defense, bt not in sparring and not in any forms I've learned yet and we haven't touched on them as a general technique so I wasn't sure if they were part of general TKD or not. (We do things in self-defense that are borrowed a bit from Hapkido and some Judo...I think : )
 
t's because of a stereotypical image people have about TKD featuring high kicks, no knees, no hand works

Oh, definitely not! : ) Forms that I know already use reverse punches, backhand strikes, spear hand, and knife hand strikes. My kids (one belt ahead of me) are learning a form with elbow strikes. My instructor insists on being able to use hand strikes when close in during sparring (whether the judges score it or not...interesingly I had a round where I punched a guy in the solar plexus and he went down. Judges didn't give me a point for the punch but I got a bonus point for the knockdown). Anyway, hand strikes is something I work on a lot.


I *do* know that a TKD roundhouse kick, for example, strikes with the instep versus a Muy Thai style of striking with the shin, so I was wondering if there was a philisophical or practical reason that knee strikes were not part of the basic TKD approach

Last week I saw "Ong-bak: The Thai Warrior" and the main character used Muy Thai with a *lot* of knee and eblow strikes so that was kinda on my mind
 
FearlessFreep said:
t's because of a stereotypical image people have about TKD featuring high kicks, no knees, no hand works

Oh, definitely not! : ) Forms that I know already use reverse punches, backhand strikes, spear hand, and knife hand strikes. My kids (one belt ahead of me) are learning a form with elbow strikes. My instructor insists on being able to use hand strikes when close in during sparring (whether the judges score it or not...interesingly I had a round where I punched a guy in the solar plexus and he went down. Judges didn't give me a point for the punch but I got a bonus point for the knockdown). Anyway, hand strikes is something I work on a lot.


I *do* know that a TKD roundhouse kick, for example, strikes with the instep versus a Muy Thai style of striking with the shin, so I was wondering if there was a philisophical or practical reason that knee strikes were not part of the basic TKD approach

Last week I saw "Ong-bak: The Thai Warrior" and the main character used Muy Thai with a *lot* of knee and eblow strikes so that was kinda on my mind
well, im wrong then :)
 
Miles said:
That is a super reference TX BB.

How about for ITF'ers...is there something similar as your terminology can be slightly different (I recall "turning kick" for "roundhouse kick", etc.)?

TIA!

Miles
Don't recall coming across one. (Maybe the TAGB TKD books)

Kinda goes like this tho:
Turning kick: Roundhouse kick aimed 45 degrees off
Side turning kick: Roundhouse kick aimed in front
Pick shaped kick: Axe kick
Crescent kick, defensive only, only out to in.
Verticle kick: Similar to crescent kick, but attacking tool(s) differs, can be performed out side to in, or vice versa offensive application only. Minimal arc.
Downward kick: Outside to in or vice versa variation of axe kick

That's it for off the top of my head...
 
Marginal said:
Don't recall coming across one. (Maybe the TAGB TKD books)

Kinda goes like this tho:
Turning kick: Roundhouse kick aimed 45 degrees off
Side turning kick: Roundhouse kick aimed in front
Pick shaped kick: Axe kick
Crescent kick, defensive only, only out to in.
Verticle kick: Similar to crescent kick, but attacking tool(s) differs, can be performed out side to in, or vice versa offensive application only. Minimal arc.
Downward kick: Outside to in or vice versa variation of axe kick

That's it for off the top of my head...
turning kick and roundhouse kick are the same kick. what do you mean 45 degrees off, perhaps you are confusing with a bandal chagi.
 
wynnema said:
turning kick and roundhouse kick are the same kick. what do you mean 45 degrees off, perhaps you are confusing with a bandal chagi.
As I said, there's turning kick, and side turning kick. The target for turning kick's 45 degrees. The target for side turning kick's 90.
 
I think the distinction is that a roundhouse kick can come into the target at a 90% offset from the plane of the target surface...or not. In our school, that 90% 'flat' attaack is preffered. But I think other schools allow/encourgae/teach that you can also come up into the target at a 45% angle. I don't know if that's by style of just philosophy of the teacher.
 
Taewondo, it kicks for sure. I took up the art because you use the strongest part of your body in this art, your legs. Big or small, your legs are the strongest part of your body. Now, is TKD the end of all of it in the MA world and the best of all martial arts??? Knuckle heads pleaseee! That's why we cross train. One single MA will not cut it in the real world... :asian:
 
I sometimes am tempted to think that one MA *can* hack it in the 'real world' as long as you train in that art to meet threats of all kinds. If all your training in any art is just against practioners of that art then you'll be in trouble when you face someone who attacks in a different way. I am sometimes thinking though that, for example, to train an extra hour using Taekwondo moves that you already spending hours drilling in anyway, to work to defend against a takedown attempt is probably more efficient than learning a new set of moves from an art that does takedowns.

(Perfect example is that I saw a takedown (shoot) attempt in a Pride match last week...the defender threw a knee to the head against the attacker and the attacker went down and about 10 seconds later the match was over when the 'defender' has jumped on the 'attacker' and was viciously kneeing him in the head before the match was called. Well...knees strikes are a Takewondo technique so spending some time training knee strikes as a takedown defense is, imho, a better use of time perfecting a technique you already know versus learning a second art and learning a whole knew set of techniques)

One reason I think out instructor mixes Hapkido joint locks into our self-defense is not that Hapkido techniques are better suited than Taekwondo techniques but simply that joint-locks allow measured-controlled appropriate response much better then head kicks :)

Mastering one art I think has advantages over split training across many arts sometimes
 
cali_tkdbruin said:
Taewondo, it kicks for sure. I took up the art because you use the strongest part of your body in this art, your legs. Big or small, your legs are the strongest part of your body. Now, is TKD the end of all of it in the MA world and the best of all martial arts??? Knuckle heads pleaseee! That's why we cross train. One single MA will not cut it in the real world... :asian:
im only quoting your post coz it's the shortest..
but i think whether you cross-train or keep on MA you should be okay as long as you practice a lot and acquire a lot of experience. i tend to believe that if you spend 30 years playing with chop sticks you might be able to defeat a good fighter with them :)
 
Freep, I have to ask you, you brought up an interesting related issue in another thread that was actually a discussion from another board. I was in that discussion on the other board. It was in regards to whether it's better to train one side of your body all the time, or both side equal time. Without rehashing it, isn't this the exact same thing? Is it better to practice one art to perfection or several equally? I know the common answer is cross-train. I don't necessarily agree. I think that answer can only be answered on an individual basis. Maybe that's a good question for another thread?

To get back on topic, the roundhouse (as I was taught) is always technically 90 deg. Many perform higher ones at 45 deg. just because their body mechanics won't allow 90 deg at say, head height. A sparring roundhouse often resembles such a kick but if done correctly the twist is at the very end of the kick and it is actually 90 deg. It's just so fast and short, it doesn't appear that way. Such things are why it's dangerous to learn by video. From watching and trying to copy, you'd learn the wrong mechanics of that kick.
 
Gemini, good points.

We perform what we call the "chop kick" as a roundhouse kick at 90 degree angle and don't drill a 45 degree. Though I've read arguments for using the mid-angle "chop kick" as a sparring tool, I'd have to counter with the danger of glancing and knee injury. But I digress - kick viability is a topic for another thread.

I'm curious as to differences in back kicks. Some perform this as a donkey-style kick. We perform this kick similarly to the side kick with the hip turned out, thrusting the heel rather than scooping it.

What say the rest of ye?
 
Back
Top