How effective is Japanese Ju Jitsu, or judo moves ‪ work on a big person?

Mephisto

Black Belt
Joined
Sep 26, 2014
Messages
594
Reaction score
236
I think that all depends upon what a martial artist is trying to accomplish.
I initially began studying aikido because a very petite 90 pound woman (Lynn Fabia, who was then senior student under Bill Sosa) tossed me bodily onto my face during a seminar. I had done some martial arts training and grew up in a bad part of town so had quite a bit of experience with fighting. At the time, I was 6' tall and weighed about 210. She picked me out for the demonstration at the beginning of the seminar because I was so much larger than she was, and in pretty good shape. She then proceeded to slam me into the mat. Not just once, but several times. I was suitably impressed, and had to start learning. I seriously doubt that lifting weights and getting bigger and stronger would have done her a bit of good. However, her skills as a martial artist were incredibly impressive.
It's common in martial arts demonstrations for the instructor to pick out a big guy to prove their skill. Sometimes the instructor will strike and hit big guys who stand their and do nothing, sometimes they'll lock or throw them. It's not impressive imo to toss around or strike a compliant uke. It's impressive to the untrained audience but that's it. You're right though, a diminutive woman will probably never be able to naturally build an intimidating physique.

Its really just a thought on my part that training time may be better spent lifting weights and getting bigger. I'm a male and was thinking about myself in this example. If I'd have spent the time I do training focusing on getting big I'd probably impress a lot more people. Not that everyone wants to be big, I dont.
 

K-man

Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Dec 17, 2008
Messages
6,193
Reaction score
1,223
Location
Australia
It's common in martial arts demonstrations for the instructor to pick out a big guy to prove their skill. Sometimes the instructor will strike and hit big guys who stand their and do nothing, sometimes they'll lock or throw them. It's not impressive imo to toss around or strike a compliant uke. It's impressive to the untrained audience but that's it. You're right though, a diminutive woman will probably never be able to naturally build an intimidating physique.
I feel you may have missed the point. In training when a new guy comes to trial our lessons it is common for the big strong guys to believe that they can out-muscle the smaller ones. I never hit them but if I can't make the technique work on them softly and slowly why would they stay? The whole point of using jujutsu is so the smaller guys can match it with the bigger, stronger ones. Being bigger and stronger doesn't stop the technique working, if you are doing it right.

By the same token, I was at a pressure point seminar once where a reasonably big time instructor kept pulling me out of the audience. Not one of his techniques worked, until he hit my outer thigh with a full force knee that I wasn't expecting. Needless to say, I wouldn't recommend his seminars to anyone. I actually found out later that most of his 'qualifications' are bogus.
 

Tez3

Sr. Grandmaster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
27,608
Reaction score
4,901
Location
England
It's common in martial arts demonstrations for the instructor to pick out a big guy to prove their skill. Sometimes the instructor will strike and hit big guys who stand their and do nothing, sometimes they'll lock or throw them. It's not impressive imo to toss around or strike a compliant uke. It's impressive to the untrained audience but that's it. You're right though, a diminutive woman will probably never be able to naturally build an intimidating physique.

Its really just a thought on my part that training time may be better spent lifting weights and getting bigger. I'm a male and was thinking about myself in this example. If I'd have spent the time I do training focusing on getting big I'd probably impress a lot more people. Not that everyone wants to be big, I dont.

10345983_334576736695284_8553868564811783176_n.jpg
 

Hanzou

Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
6,770
Reaction score
1,330
Brazilian Juijitsu works on bigger people;

 

Drose427

3rd Black Belt
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Messages
927
Reaction score
251
Location
USA
Okay I think I understand what you all are saying.

You not really supposed to use force on bigger person because it will not work.
Exactly,
Not even a little of mucling will work, the bigger guy wont move at all many times. You need proper technique
Brazilian Juijitsu works on bigger people;


Well then its a shame OP never asked about BJJ
 
Last edited:

Chris Parker

Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
6,278
Reaction score
1,123
Location
Melbourne, Australia
JJJ, Judo and Bjj are all very closely related.

Sure… but wasn't part of the question, and hasn't been a part of any of the OPs recent threads, all of which are centred (rightly or wrongly) around Japanese Jujutsu almost exclusively. Perhaps you can let a few go without having to hawk your art, yeah? Especially as, well, BJJ is kinda the restrained, safe version of the restrained, safe kids version of the restrained, safe version of the actual stuff… ha!
 

Hanzou

Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
6,770
Reaction score
1,330
Sure… but wasn't part of the question, and hasn't been a part of any of the OPs recent threads, all of which are centred (rightly or wrongly) around Japanese Jujutsu almost exclusively. Perhaps you can let a few go without having to hawk your art, yeah? Especially as, well, BJJ is kinda the restrained, safe version of the restrained, safe kids version of the restrained, safe version of the actual stuff… ha!



Actually Bjj is more like an unrestrained form of Kodokan Judo. Basically its a continuation of the early years of Judo where Judoka would travel the world and fight other styles, and bring new techniques back to the Kodokan for implementation. Judo stopped doing that, while Bjj never stopped doing it, and is continuing to evolve because of it. So I definitely wouldn't consider Bjj a more restrained form of Judo, quite the opposite in fact.

As to the OP, Judo and Bjj are related, sister arts. If someone asked me if Judo worked, I would show them a Bjj clip, and vice versa. There simply isn't a lot of footage showing Judoka fighting against opponents a lot bigger than they are, but there's plenty of Bjj footage showcasing Bjj fighters using what is funadmentally no-gi Judo Newaza against larger opponents. So I felt that it fit the topic.

Also so many Judokas and Jiujiteiros cross train that the OP would be hard-pressed to find an American Judoka who didn't have some level of Bjj training.
 

Chris Parker

Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
6,278
Reaction score
1,123
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Actually Bjj is more like an unrestrained form of Kodokan Judo. Basically its a continuation of the early years of Judo where Judoka would travel the world and fight other styles, and bring new techniques back to the Kodokan for implementation. Judo stopped doing that, while Bjj never stopped doing it, and is continuing to evolve because of it. So I definitely wouldn't consider Bjj a more restrained form of Judo, quite the opposite in fact.

To be a little more serious, and less tongue in cheek, BJJ has continued to evolve into a higher level of specialisation to a particular context… to be less serious, yeah, it's grown men playing at early Kosen Judo (High School Judo), which focused on ground work instead of throws because it was safer… you know, kids stuff for safety… ha!

As to the OP, Judo and Bjj are related, sister arts. If someone asked me if Judo worked, I would show them a Bjj clip, and vice versa. Also so many Judokas and Jiujiteiros cross train that the OP would be hard-pressed to find an American Judoka who didn't have some level of Bjj training.

More's the pity, to my mind. But frankly, if someone asked if Judo worked, showing a clip of a different (albeit related) art I'd consider rather pointless… it'd be like asking if cross-bow hunting was easy, and showing some archery competition to demonstrate. If the question is about Judo, answer about Judo… if it's about Japanese Jujutsu, answer about that. If it's related grappling-based arts, by all means bring up BJJ… but recognise that you risk coming across as a zealot by bringing it up every possible opportunity like this… which typically is more likely to turn people off both your ideas and your posts by expecting such single-track posts.
 

Hanzou

Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
6,770
Reaction score
1,330
To be a little more serious, and less tongue in cheek, BJJ has continued to evolve into a higher level of specialisation to a particular context… to be less serious, yeah, it's grown men playing at early Kosen Judo (High School Judo), which focused on ground work instead of throws because it was safer… you know, kids stuff for safety… ha!

Again, I disagree. Traditional Bjj actively incorporated Judo and wrestling takedowns and throws, and more modern Bjj is still actively incorporating takedowns and throws from wrestling, Judo, and old school Bjj. Traditional Bjj taught striking too, as clearly shown in their various NHB fights.

More's the pity, to my mind. But frankly, if someone asked if Judo worked, showing a clip of a different (albeit related) art I'd consider rather pointless… it'd be like asking if cross-bow hunting was easy, and showing some archery competition to demonstrate. If the question is about Judo, answer about Judo… if it's about Japanese Jujutsu, answer about that. If it's related grappling-based arts, by all means bring up BJJ… but recognise that you risk coming across as a zealot by bringing it up every possible opportunity like this… which typically is more likely to turn people off both your ideas and your posts by expecting such single-track posts.

Well again, its quite difficult to find a clip of a Judoka taking down a larger opponent. If Bjj is as many Judoka like to claim "Basically Just Judo", I don't see the problem. :)
 

Tony Dismukes

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
7,635
Reaction score
7,726
Location
Lexington, KY
Those flipping, throwing and take-downs techniques work on person 50 pounds or 100 pounds more than you!!!:eek::eek: or even 150 pounds being overweight or a bodybuilder.

So how can small skinny guy or small skinny girl weighs like a feather almost anorexic do these moves on big person.When they are like 60,100 or 150 pounds more!!





It is like these people doing these moves on big person like Mike Tyson or some one big like .

Not saying they can or cannot do it as I have not read enough on Japanese Ju Jitsu, or judo.


Big person really big.

Big Gus Flickr - Photo Sharing

or
2008-VBG-OctWorkout009 Flickr - Photo Sharing

or
Poker room young chub Flickr - Photo Sharing

or
BIG guy little bike 2 Flickr - Photo Sharing

or
Big Guy Flickr - Photo Sharing

or big bodybuilder
Slovakian-Bodybuilder Flickr - Photo Sharing

or
bodybuilder robert burneika Flickr - Photo Sharing

or
bodybuilder 25 Flickr - Photo Sharing

or
CRW 5821 Flickr - Photo Sharing


Or would they be better of using karate in self defense?

:Blackalien:


1) These throws and takedowns absolutely can be used effectively against larger opponents.
2) That doesn't mean it's easy. Throwing a smaller opponent is easier than throwing a larger one. If you want to be successful against larger opponents, then you need a substantial advantage in skill.
3) If the larger opponent also has skill and training, then it becomes even harder and you need a major advantage in skill and would be well served to have speed and pound-per-pound strength on your side as well.
4) Points 1-3 apply just as much to the idea of knocking out a larger opponent using a striking art.
 
Top