6 Completely Legal Ways Cops Can Screw You (Warning: Language)
- Thread starter Thesemindz
- Start date
Archangel M
Senior Master
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Messages
- 4,555
- Reaction score
- 154
From one of the comments:
LOL!! :lfao::lfao:
LOL!! :lfao::lfao:
CoryKS
Senior Master
I'm calling BS. If a bunch of cops pour beer over your head, you are so going in on DUI charges.
You do realize that most of those aren't quite as simple as made out, nor are they often used nearly as maliciously as the anecdotes included.
For example, asset forfeiture is not nearly such a simple matter as implied. The whole idea is to hit the bad guys where it hurts, since in many cases jail terms are no impediment... Even then, they need ... See Moreto show the nexus, and deal with several other legalities.
Citing speed by eye requires appropriate training and a track record -- and is really just going back to what most state codes say anyway. RADAR or other speed determinations devices simply verify and quantify the violation directly observed by the officer. That was discussed at length here on MT.
Public drunkenness and the condom laws both are attempts to deal with a problem; they may be as subtle as using a hammer in a china shop, but the problems aren't always easy to solve, either. Used with reasonable discretion (are you sure the article presents the WHOLE story? I note that they don't describe what if anything was done against the officers who appear to have abused their discretion.)
Videotaping is a thorny issue; it can reveal important tactical, evidentiary or otherwise restricted information. If it's a two party consent state... that's the law.
The use of real identities is another complex issue. Most agencies I'm familiar with would only do this in rare cases, where the benefits are worth the risks and potential problems.
I'm not suggesting all cops are perfect -- but they aren't the monsters being suggested by this article. The writer would have done himself a favor, in my mind, if he had avoided the extremist take on some of these.
For example, asset forfeiture is not nearly such a simple matter as implied. The whole idea is to hit the bad guys where it hurts, since in many cases jail terms are no impediment... Even then, they need ... See Moreto show the nexus, and deal with several other legalities.
Citing speed by eye requires appropriate training and a track record -- and is really just going back to what most state codes say anyway. RADAR or other speed determinations devices simply verify and quantify the violation directly observed by the officer. That was discussed at length here on MT.
Public drunkenness and the condom laws both are attempts to deal with a problem; they may be as subtle as using a hammer in a china shop, but the problems aren't always easy to solve, either. Used with reasonable discretion (are you sure the article presents the WHOLE story? I note that they don't describe what if anything was done against the officers who appear to have abused their discretion.)
Videotaping is a thorny issue; it can reveal important tactical, evidentiary or otherwise restricted information. If it's a two party consent state... that's the law.
The use of real identities is another complex issue. Most agencies I'm familiar with would only do this in rare cases, where the benefits are worth the risks and potential problems.
I'm not suggesting all cops are perfect -- but they aren't the monsters being suggested by this article. The writer would have done himself a favor, in my mind, if he had avoided the extremist take on some of these.
All I can say is I don't worry about condoms, and I feel sorry for anyone who steals my identity. LOL!
Actually, while some of the concerns are valid ones, how reliable is Cracked? I mean, isn't that the magazine that was like a bad rehash of MAD?
Actually, while some of the concerns are valid ones, how reliable is Cracked? I mean, isn't that the magazine that was like a bad rehash of MAD?
CoryKS
Senior Master
I think so. I remember reading the magazine back in the '70s. And yes, it was a bad rehash. Some of their lists have been pretty informative, though. They seem to research their stuff pretty well. I Google Map'ed some of their lists of weird geological formations and the sites were just as described.
Archangel M
Senior Master
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Messages
- 4,555
- Reaction score
- 154
It's a typical internet based fluff piece. Create any title as a "6 ways...10 examples of" to generate more hits. Take a list of controversial and superficially covered examples and put together an article to keep your "blog based" publication stocked with current articles. Its about generating hits for that ad revenue over any journalistic exploration of an issue.
Empty Hands
Senior Master
"Journalistic exploration"? It's a comedy and satire magazine!
**Makes notes**
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2003
- Messages
- 9,998
- Reaction score
- 206
Indeed, and as much as it used to be a sad parody of "MAD", it's internet version at least has changed, and things like it'sTop 10 lists are often rather amusing, but also tend to contain more than a small amount of the truth.
Take this particular article. It does paint many of these in what I'd consider "worst case" scenario's, and is of course written toungue in cheek but at the same time it cites real cases, often of things we have spoken about here on this board... such as the no-radar required traffic tickets, and the ongoing discussions of photographing/videotaping of police in public. If this article appeared in say any *ahem* reputable *ahem* newspaper, it wouldn't need to change the meat of the article to still be factual... only perhaps the presentation itself.
how not to get screw'D by the man!!!!! (WARNING LANGUAGE)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0m...BC13B71E&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=17
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0m...BC13B71E&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=17
Come now, you know damn well that the only way to not get screwed by the man is to get arrested by a female officer. :boing2:
Depends on the size of her billy-club:whip:
If you steal my identity, all you get is practice.
Sean
A long time ago, in a town far far away.
Of course, just because they -can- doesn't mean they -do-. Otherwise, how else can you explain how an opinionated schmuck like me can drive 50k miles and not be bothered?
