P
Patrick Skerry
Guest
What is your argument whether judo is a sport or a martial art?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, you see, that appears to be Dr. Kano's view as well, that a shiai is not a game, but technique testing. Dr. Kano's repetoire of training was: Randori 80%; Kata 17%; and shiai 3% of judo. (see Donn Draeger's article: 'What is Rank?').bignick said:good to see this split off...
i think it depends on how you define judo...it's awfully hard to find a gym today that isn't at least a bit sport-oriented....
i think my view on the matter is skewed due to my training...my judo/jujutsu instructor is the same person and i don't practice judo as a sport....do i compete in judo shiai..yes...and they can be a rewarding experience...i view shiai and randori as training tools for testing yourself agains a resisting opponent...not as a sport and not as a real life situation
Hello Kane:Kane said:Judo is a sport as well a Martial Art. Same with Boxing, Wrestling, and Tae Kwon Do. Just becasue they are in the Olympics, doesn't mean the sport isn't a Martial Art.
he goes on to sayToday judo is mainly (in fact, virtually only) a sport. What we today call judo is far removed from what its originator had conceived and created. Jigoro Kano's theoretical developments and philosophical musings find no resonance in today's sport. We see only the tip of the iceberg, and only a tip that, under the influence of time, has changed it's outline, acquiring new contours until it barely resembles the original form. Kano saw judo technique as a means to self-perfection on the path to achieving an ethical ideal. Today, alas, goals, points, and seconds have been given primary importance, causing the sport much harm. And even in judo's homeland, Japan, matters of prestige on the world tatami have pushed to the background the ideas that guided the great educator.
he has more about the time Prof. Kano ripped into a group of competitors after a competition for the poor judo they were practicing in order to win medals...telling them brute strength is not the judo i showed you and how practicing and competing like that would be the end of Kodokan Judo...What do we see today? Judo technique? Yes, without a doubt. But the spirit of judo as Jigoro Kano understood it is lacking now. Is this good or bad? There is no clear-cut answer to this question. That's how it has turned out. Such is the influence of time
Hi Richard,bignick said:First off, I do not practice kendo, but i hold the people that do in the highest regard...the training i have seen is intense and requires great dedication.....
but from what i understand kendo competition has little to do real life swordmanship...from what i understand, the legal scoring areas in kendo are all to the chest and head...where the people are most heavily armored...obviously, this is to protect the practitioners from getting hurt in competition, but in a real situation the swordsman would aim for the weakest parts...that weren't armored, or very lightly covered...
that's the sport of kendo...
i'm willing to bet that most kendo schools teach striking to the vulnerable areas under controlled conditions such as in class were the risk of injury is less than in a shiai...
from reading your posts i can tell you greatly dislike what competition or sport judo has become so you want to distance yourself from it...i can't say i really disagree with a lot of the arguments you've made...but the truth is that is almost impossible to seperate the sport from judo...because that is what the majority of people are practicing...
this is taken from the book that was just published by Vladimir Putin...
he goes on to say
he has more about the time Prof. Kano ripped into a group of competitors after a competition for the poor judo they were practicing in order to win medals...telling them brute strength is not the judo i showed you and how practicing and competing like that would be the end of Kodokan Judo...
the point is that whatever your feelings on what judo should be or what it has become probably aren't going to change anything...judo is what it is and it is what it has become...
my only advice is to practice the art as you see fit...and in the way the bests serves your ideals
Yes, and that is some of the problems, the recreational judo practitioner is a threat to sport judo.bignick said:i didn't say this is the only way it's practiced...
you say judo is a martial art...not a sport...that it can't be both...
but it is practiced as both...i left out some parts of Putin's book that talked about how even today judo is still practiced by some as a pure martial art and in the kodokan the have sections that teach the martial/self defense aspects...because i didn't think they pertained to the discussion
some people practice judo as a pastime...or sport, for fun and excersize and so on...
other practice it very seriously as a martial art
some people fall inbetween...
I believe the very original purpose of a martial art - to kill - is what prevents it from becoming a sport without some extreme modification to the point of total mutation, unrecognizable as the original art.someguy said:What prevents a martial art from being a sport as well?
I don't know judo so I could really add much to this topic.
That is happening a lot. A lot of people start judo because its a martial art, then as a few years go by and they begin to progress, they are suddenly steered to the competition side of it; sometimes to the exclusion of all else. This is when a lot of people drop out of judo, when it turns into a sport.Ceicei said:I do practice Judo, but only as a secondary martial arts (my primary art is American Kenpo). I did not take up Judo to compete. However, the Judo school I go to do train with a sports view. If they start to insist when I get higher up in the ranks that I must compete, I will probably leave to take JuJutsu elsewhere. There are others who have done the same thing. JuJutsu does not have a sports view as much as Judo.
- Ceicei
Competition is as much a test for the referree as it is for the competitor. The Japanese haven't lost sight of this fact, but the IOC have by trying to make the ref's job easier with the blue gi (and the 'Golden Score'). Neither will improve judo, or improve the quality of referee's in international competition.bignick said:there is no sport view in jujitsu, period...that's one of the reason's Kano created judo...so people could practice their techniques against other people without having to worry about being killed during the competition...which kind of weakens your position on judo not being sportdom...judo is not a sport as i practice it...but let's face it...a shiai is a sporting aspect of modern judo...whether you want to admit it or not...i highly doubt many people enter a shiai with thought of dying on their minds...
we seem to be on the same side of the tracks here...neither believes that judo is sport and trying to turn it into a sport is doing harm to judo...
we seem to have different definitions on what constitutes a sport...there has always been a sporting aspect to judo, in my opinion...
there's a difference between being a sport and having sporting aspects...you be able to compete in judo safely you have to have rules and there has to be a sporting philosophy behind it...otherwise people get hurt...if you have someone in a choke or a submission and they pass out or tap you let go...that's a sporting philosophy...if someone gets a good throw and ippon is called the match is over...the loser doesn't try to get up and continue the fight...he lost the competition
And what is the 'strictest' definition of a martial art?bignick said:well...if we use the strictest definition of martial art...judo isn't one...