They were staring at one another's feet and had their hands in down-block position the whole time--maybe it works better when you know what's coming (virtually all round kicks).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They were staring at one another's feet and had their hands in down-block position the whole time--maybe it works better when you know what's coming (virtually all round kicks).
But what also catched my attention was to see, in the second vid, that the guys did receive some round kicks with down blocks directly against the kicks movement (I mean, against the shin bone). I think this should be very dangerous if attempted for real.
Yes, we have a group that trains under this organization at my college. They are Chung Do Kwan I believe. To be honest, I was not at all impressed by them. They practice their poomse extremely fast just like the video and they spar completely non-contact. To me they look like an extremely soft style of TKD, more of a fun activity type of thing. Not exactly my cup of tea when it comes to training.
What I saw in both videos was not my cup of tea.But what also catched my attention was to see, in the second vid, that the guys did receive some round kicks with down blocks directly against the kicks movement (I mean, against the shin bone). I think this should be very dangerous if attempted for real. It's interesting, too, that I've heard of many discussions here about the application of down block (even that it was not meant to be a block). Some people sustained that it should defend a kick, but never a round kick -- instead, for example, it would receive a front kick -- what means the hand or forearm wouldn't directly receive full impact of the kick movement. So we have to agree that, if down block was never meant to be used like that (directly against the shin bone), it doesn't mean some people never teach it -- that's just what they did in some parts of the video. Honestly, I hardly believe this is an isolate case.
What I saw in both videos was not my cup of tea.
Regardless, I have better things to do than to find videos of other people and post them for the express purpose of making fun of them on an MA forum.
If you consider that early training included forgiing the blocking as well as attacking surfaces includinmg the forearm bones, does your statement remain the same?
Watched the second video several times. He isn't blocking against the shin bone, but striking the back of the kicking leg with his pal-mok.
What I saw in both videos was not my cup of tea.
Regardless, I have better things to do than to find videos of other people and post them for the express purpose of making fun of them on an MA forum.
Sure. Click dislike on the video and leave a comment as to why. No need to link it/post it elsewhere for the express purpose of having something to poke fun at.well, since it is TKD they are doing (sort of) and this is a TKD site...it stands to reason that their technique would be up for discussion.
After all, we did not go around and secretly video them to ridicule, they put it up to....I don't know, show off their stuff?
Once it's on Youtube, it is pretty much fair game.
Dear Daniel, I believe most of the times the men in the video really do just the way you said. But after downloading the vid in HD resolution (720p) and watching parts in slow motion, I still have the strong impression that they <also> defend with forearm against shin bone. Maybe it wasn't exactly on purpose, I don't know. But I believe if you watch the video carefully, you will notice this, too. To show you what I'm saying, look at the images below. They correspond to the very first down blocks used by both men -- both seem to have blocked the way I said. Remember however I didn't say they defend this way all the time, I notice they also defend striking the back of the kicking leg, too, the way you described. I edited the images, once in HD the original pictures would be too big and heavy.
I don't get this thread...if you don't like what they do....don't train with them...they seem to enjoy it....who cares!!!!!
What is with the title to the thread?
If some people from the past had put up a thread like this about another style you guys would have had a cow and reported him!
Wow!!!!!!
I agree while it can be argued yes we can talk al day about the quality of technique in these individuals the OP starts out with a slam on WTF the premise is that all WTF looks like this? There are no bad styles only poor instructors so to make the claim that a style or entire organization is at best uneducated or imature. Early 70's I visited a very nice Shotokan DoJo to watch class never seen it before and surmized that all Shotokan was bad after watching those people? Obviously wrong errors of youth.
I think people should consider being careful what they post on Youtube and even instructors if they or do not want some of thier students to be ridiculed should keep smart phones and other recording devices banned from certain events beyond still pictures.
I believe these folks are from GM Duk Sung Son's lineage. They acquired a habit of performing patterns as quickly as possible which makes them abrupt and un-unified with their bodily movement.
Sure. Click dislike on the video and leave a comment as to why. No need to link it/post it elsewhere for the express purpose of having something to poke fun at.
Many taekwondoin, regardless of federation or association like to invoke the tenets that General Choi promoted. One of those is courtesy. Do you consider using the work of others for the express purpose of holding it up to mock courteous?
Given that GM Son was, at one point, Chung Do Kwan Jang I find it interesting that he developed his style in what appears to be a contradictory direction. While speed certainly plays a large part in power generation the isolated body mechanics would tend to work at cross purposes.
I was referring mainly to the OP, not necessarily the discussion that followed, some of which was respectful and serious, some of which was not.I am sorry, but I do have to disagree with you on that one.
I mean, yes, there should be no making fun of the gentlemen (and the allowance for age does not count since there are a few younger guys in the back) but thee is a good deal of stuff that is open for serious discussion.
As I said, I offer no defense for the video, its content, or its participants; it is not my cup of tea for many of the reasons that you mentioned above. As to what I would say to them? Pleased to meet you. Thank you for stopping by.Aside from the speed.
Le me ask you this: if one of these distinguished BBs walked into your place tomorrow and demonstrated their abilities in above shown manner, what would you tell them? (after you scraped your jaw off the floor, I am sure...)
The speed is one thing, but there is enough going on there that has me thinking sloppy technique. it starts with the fact that no two of the guys have the same stance and posture to begin with.
The cheery guy in the front later on displays a kick with the foot at about a 45 degree angle. If he were to connect with anything half way solid, he's be breaking his toes and probably his foot to boot!
I have seen similar display before: By people making fun of Martial Arts.
Like Chris Farley in his Ninja movie, or every other one were somebody tries to show off their -Fu skillz they don't have. At least with Lamont Sanford it was funny.
'They are getting off the couch' only reaches so far as argument.
So far I think the discussion has been relatively respectful.
Le me ask you this: if one of these distinguished BBs walked into your place tomorrow and demonstrated their abilities in above shown manner, what would you tell them? (after you scraped your jaw off the floor, I am sure...)
.