Why?

Discussion in 'The Deadliest Warriors' started by Blindside, Apr 20, 2010.

  1. Blindside

    Blindside Senior Master

    • Founding Member
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2001
    Messages:
    4,922
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    So why does this (stupid) show get a forum? And are we really considering this "analysis" anything other than entertainment? And regardless of the opinion of the show, shouldn't it be a sub-forum of The Rec Room?
     
  2. Bob Hubbard

    Bob Hubbard Retired

    • MartialTalk Mentor
    • Founding Member
    • LifeTime Supporting Member
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Messages:
    47,249
    Likes Received:
    763
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Location:
    Land of the Free
    I like the premise of the show, though it is entertaining while sometimes off base and inaccurate.

    Part of my thinking here is to take a more serious look at the various warrior types throughout history, examine them in-depth and look more at their techniques, arms and armours. For the moment, it's focused on this 1 show, but I've seen several other shows in the same vein, and welcome combining their info as well.

    If it turns into a entertainment rather than martial exploration, I'll move the whole area under entertainment. For now, I'm more interested in looking at the martial arts and combat aspects these types of shows bring up.
     
  3. Omar B

    Omar B Senior Master

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Messages:
    3,687
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Location:
    Queens, NY. Fort Lauderdale, FL
    Yeah, I don't see the need for this show having it's own sub-forum at all. I don't run the place though, so really it's not my call.

    I do find the show highly inaccurate at times and overly concerned with weaponry over the warriors themselves. There's a show on Nat Geo that takes a close look at special forces of different kinds and operating arenas which I think is way closer to the mark. Heck, they practically froze a sniper then had him shoot, the baked him under hot lights and asked him to do the same, or subjecting pilots to operational level g-forces. Very rarely does DW take into account the level of preparedness these warriors have.
     
  4. Brian R. VanCise

    Brian R. VanCise MT Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    Messages:
    27,627
    Likes Received:
    1,468
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    This show was from a technical stand point terrible with many so called experts being well very limited in their level of expertise. The show in and of itself is an epic fail to most serious martial practitioners. Yet I do understand Bob's desire to utilize it as a spring board to spur discussion! ;)
     
  5. Bob Hubbard

    Bob Hubbard Retired

    • MartialTalk Mentor
    • Founding Member
    • LifeTime Supporting Member
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Messages:
    47,249
    Likes Received:
    763
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Location:
    Land of the Free
    What's the name of the show? I'd like to take a peek at it, maybe bring some of their info into play here.

    Keep in mind, I'm using this as a spring board. In 6 months, the sections name might be changed, the mission expanded or shifted etc.

    I think some of the match ups are poor, the weapon choices odd, and the scenarios presented strange, however I do like the idea of identifying a particular culture and times "warriors", their arms and armour, looking at their training and mindsets, then arguing who could kick the others ***.
     
  6. Blindside

    Blindside Senior Master

    • Founding Member
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2001
    Messages:
    4,922
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Fight Science
     
  7. jks9199

    jks9199 Administrator Staff Member

    • LifeTime Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    21,089
    Likes Received:
    1,824
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Northern VA
    The final scenarios are jokes. They some how put their two "deadly warriors" up against each other, running through the various weapons in sequence.

    For the historic weapons... I've not been hugely impressed by the skills shown.

    Fight Science is OK -- but it's got lots of the same problems. They're "experts" aren't necessarily experts with the weapons when it comes to historic weapons. When they do stuff with modern weapons/warriors, like elite military forces, it's better. But some of their tests are bizarre, to say the least. They often seem like they're out to show a particular result, and gear the test to that. (Like one with capoeria and other martial arts, on a weird moving platform...)

    They're interesting TV. Fight Science is a bit better on the science side... but neither are going out of their way to do "good" science. They're making TV.
     
  8. Bob Hubbard

    Bob Hubbard Retired

    • MartialTalk Mentor
    • Founding Member
    • LifeTime Supporting Member
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Messages:
    47,249
    Likes Received:
    763
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Location:
    Land of the Free
    I'm not impressed with the final "show" in DW. The scenarios are often quite implausible IMO, and the theatrics just that. Nice show, but, eh on realism.

    The tests sometimes seem decent, other times I just shake my head. Some things are obvious (an icepick compared to a sai, sai of course is going to do more damage. It's longer, heavier and the guys got 2 of em.). The scoring seems based a lot on opinion as well.

    I much preferred the tests Mike Lodes did in Weapons the Made Britain, which were much more detailed.
     
  9. Haakon

    Haakon Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Fight Science is pretty interesting, you can see many segments from the show on Youtube. They've done some interesting tests, like which style has the best punch or kick. Of course their testing method leaves a lot to be desired, but it's entertaining.
     
  10. Omar B

    Omar B Senior Master

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Messages:
    3,687
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Location:
    Queens, NY. Fort Lauderdale, FL
    What he said. It's 4/20 today and I totally spaced on the name.
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2010
  11. Bruno@MT

    Bruno@MT Senior Master

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,399
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    108
    If this is the show I've seen where they compare 2 warriors of different time / place... yes, it sucked big time. I didn't realize how bad it was until I watched ninja vs spartan. They didn't even have anyone form an X kan, they had a neo ninja and a seedy looking asian fellow as the ninja team, using weapons like that ninja-to that never actually existed....

    It hurt me to watch, and in the end I was so glad that the ninja got crunched by the spartan.
     
  12. terryl965

    terryl965 <center><font size="2"><B>Martial Talk Ultimate<BR

    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    41,259
    Likes Received:
    335
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Grand Prairie Texas
    All I know is the show is simply for entertainment and a place where I can laugh and argue over what they say.

    Now Fight Science seems to be a better show.
     
  13. punisher73

    punisher73 Senior Master

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,253
    Likes Received:
    390
    Trophy Points:
    143
    That got me as well when watching it. They used a weapon that only existed in the 80's ninja movies. Would have helped them out more to actually use a katana.
     
  14. OnlyAnEgg

    OnlyAnEgg Senior Master

    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,402
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Location:
    Savannah
    la la la

    I turned off the cable 2 years ago; so, this show doesn't stress me.

    I like Fight Quest, though. I watch that on NetFlix.
     
  15. Bob Hubbard

    Bob Hubbard Retired

    • MartialTalk Mentor
    • Founding Member
    • LifeTime Supporting Member
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Messages:
    47,249
    Likes Received:
    763
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Location:
    Land of the Free
    You mean, there is no such thing as a ninto? But....I saw it once in a book. lol
     
  16. Gaius Julius Caesar

    Gaius Julius Caesar Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    552
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Woodbridge, Va
    The show is a trainwreck that you can't help but watch because it is an interesting subject.

    The problems are many, including the little geek who enters the data, his oppinions are less than useless he has no MA background and appears to know jack about History.

    I love how a big cleave of something impresses them more than most stabs and they only repect stabs that go through thwe body. These idiots do not know that the Romans did much of their conquering with troops who wer trained to stick about 3 inches of their blade into the body, pull out and move on. It's estimated that the Galdus had killed more people in war than any other hand held weapon untill the AK-47.

    All the same, you sometimes see great stuff like Delongis with a Claymore or the Spartan reinacters.

    When the show came out I joked "They should do the IRA vs. Al-Queda." well they pretty much did. LOL!
     
  17. JohnnyEnglish

    JohnnyEnglish Green Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2015
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Planet Mars
    I agree, this show might be fun to watch for a 14 years old, but for an adult with martial arts backround and maybe even military or law enforcment backround, or just an adult with some knowledge, this show is utter BS.
     

Share This Page