michaeledward
Grandmaster
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2003
- Messages
- 6,063
- Reaction score
- 82
How about this ...
The United States pays THREE HUNDRED BILLION dollars to put the most effective killing force ever conceived into a small country on the other side of the world.
Then, the United States offers ONE BILLION dollars to anyone who can 'stabilize' ten cities within that country.
http://www.fedgrants.gov/Applicants/AID/OM/BAG/RFA&%23032%3B267-06-001/Grant.html
There is just so much, that is so wrong, with this. I don't even know where to start.
The United States military is so incompetent that it can't stabilize the country it is occupying?
The United States government, after spending what it has on the war, somehow thinks an additional 0.3% of funding will make a difference?
Tell me again, who has been fired for this disaster?
The United States pays THREE HUNDRED BILLION dollars to put the most effective killing force ever conceived into a small country on the other side of the world.
Then, the United States offers ONE BILLION dollars to anyone who can 'stabilize' ten cities within that country.
http://www.fedgrants.gov/Applicants/AID/OM/BAG/RFA&%23032%3B267-06-001/Grant.html
There is just so much, that is so wrong, with this. I don't even know where to start.
The United States military is so incompetent that it can't stabilize the country it is occupying?
The United States government, after spending what it has on the war, somehow thinks an additional 0.3% of funding will make a difference?
Tell me again, who has been fired for this disaster?