None if the above should be construed as agreement with eliminating protections for police. Saying it is part of the job is what we tell each other privately when we suggest they were close to (or did) go too far or react too quickly. But to attempt to codify that would be like absolving electrical companies from civil suits because the electricians knew they were in a dangerous job. That regardless of any lack of good safety features by the companies to mitigate as much danger as possible. Any judge who thinks police shouldn't receive at least as much protection as any other citizen has flawed reasoning in my opinion.