Scientific Study Says People Are Too Stupid for Democracy

Discussion in 'The Study' started by Makalakumu, Feb 4, 2013.

  1. Makalakumu

    Makalakumu Gonzo Karate Apocalypse

    • MartialTalk Mentor
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2003
    Messages:
    13,887
    Likes Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Hawaii
    http://news.yahoo.com/people-arent-smart-enough-democracy-flourish-scientists-185601411.html



    As we debate gun control, global warming, and other complex issues, this study comes as a shot of strychnine to the optimism gland. Enjoy.

     
  2. Xue Sheng

    Xue Sheng All weight is underside

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    30,545
    Likes Received:
    4,817
    Trophy Points:
    308
    Location:
    North American Tectonic Plate
    I agree...it is just I would have left "for Democracy" out of the title :D
     
  3. granfire

    granfire Sr. Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2007
    Messages:
    15,013
    Likes Received:
    859
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    In Pain
    devil...
     
  4. Tez3

    Tez3 Sr. Grandmaster

    • Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    27,091
    Likes Received:
    4,483
    Trophy Points:
    308
    Location:
    England
    I don't know about the US but one doesn't need qualifications here to practice or call oneself a psychologist. This is because it's not considered a proper or exact science (one can't prove or disprove anything in psychology) science.....and nothing on this thread or the other about liberals being mentally ill has done much to disprove that.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/sep/14/psychological-profile-behavioural-psychology

    http://cynicalbastards.com/cynic/psych.html

    If anything is stupid it's believing psychologists :lol:
     
  5. Makalakumu

    Makalakumu Gonzo Karate Apocalypse

    • MartialTalk Mentor
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2003
    Messages:
    13,887
    Likes Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Hawaii
    In the US, you can earn advanced degrees in psychology. This study is coming out of Cornell, one of our top institutions. That said, it actually seems like common sense. For example, how is the average person really supposed to understand the global warming debate? Most people don't have anywhere near the education to understand what either side is saying and are simply falling back on their pre-existing ideological biases to make a decision. The average voter has no clue about the efficacy of "carbon taxes" and has no economic background to really evaluate them. So, how is the average person supposed to cast a vote?

    In the end, I think a lot of modern politics is explained by this study. The voting has little to do with reason and more to do with who spent the most money and screamed the loudest for attention. Candidates are judged on their looks and superficial aspects because no one understands what they hell they are saying.
     
  6. Steve

    Steve Mostly Harmless

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    17,788
    Likes Received:
    3,588
    Trophy Points:
    308
    Location:
    Covington, WA
    Add to this that news agencies are often unabashedly biased now. Fox News, MSNBC and many others make no bones about their slant. While it's called news, they're really sharing opinions.

    In another thread, CC said something interesting about not need to be spoonfed his philosophy. This is a real problem we're having now, where people not only need to be spoon fed their opinions, but can no longer distinguish between their own opinion and the one they heard online or on TV.

    Edit: Just want to add that the one thing that jumps out is the word "stupid." I think that stupid and ignorant are very different, and I'd say that most people are ignorant. I work my 40 doing something other than politics.
     
  7. Tez3

    Tez3 Sr. Grandmaster

    • Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    27,091
    Likes Received:
    4,483
    Trophy Points:
    308
    Location:
    England
    It's still not a proper science though.
    It makes me laugh when people go on about how stupid other people are. Perhaps people vote for anyone at all because they are well educated and clever enough to know that it doesn't make the slightest bit of difference who gets into power because all politicians are money grabbing, self centred, pompous prats. The people vote for whoever they dislike the least knowing that someone has to get in and once in the people don't get a say in anything. It's not that they don't understand the politicians...it's that they understand them only too well.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2013
  8. celtic_crippler

    celtic_crippler Senior Master

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,968
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    I’ve alluded to this point several times… unfortunately. It’s not something, as an American, that I am proud of.

    At the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Benjamin Franklin was approached by Dr. James McHenry as he exited Independence Hall. Dr. McHenry, one of Maryland’s delegates, asked Franklin, “Well? What do we have, a Republic or a Monarchy?”

    Franklin replied, “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

    "It is an axiom in my mind that our liberty can never be safe but in the hands of the people themselves, and that too of the people with a certain degree of instruction. This it is the business of the state to effect, and on a general plan." - Jefferson to George Washington, January 4, 1786


    The Founders realized how integral a part the People had in maintaining a functional Republic and knew that the maintenance of liberty and freedom depended mostly upon them with limited government.

    Knowing that, don’t you find the decline in our educational system, standards, and performance since the inception of the Department of Education quite interesting? Coincidence?

    Also, at one time, only those “People” with something to lose; with “skin in the game”, were allowed to vote. But, that was considered unfair and over time everyone who lives here over the age of 18 can now vote; regardless of how ignorant they are.

    That being said, the Electoral College actually has the final say as to who is elected. But how many people know that? How many people realize the College is hand-picked by the duopoly (that’s the dominant two parties, Republicans and Democrats.)

    Not only are these people put in place to perpetuate the duopoly, but their identities aren’t revealed until well after the elections so if you actually cared enough to research them to attempt to glean their motives, it wouldn’t matter anyway. However, in most cases, they usually follow popular opinion; but not always as the Cook Report points out. Still, it’s about 95% of the time so what’s the difference?

    I personally like the appeal of a Heinlein approach. This theory asserts that only citizens can participate in government, and to become a citizen one must first have a certain level of education and also contribute to society.

    The idea is that by sacrificing to achieve a certain level of education and by sacrificing part of one’s early life one will place a higher value on the liberties and freedoms they obtain from it. In essence, it creates a greater level of responsibility and leads to one feeling they have “skin in the game.”

    Sacrifice could obviously include military service, but could also lead to the creation of other programs. For example, a “Peace Corps” that instead of focusing on other countries, goes out to our poorer communities and helps rebuild slums, feed the poor, and/or provided medical assistance and indigent care.

    Of course, those serving in a life-long, career-type capacity would be included; firemen, police, etc. But all would also be required to have a certain level of education including, not omitting as schools in Washington DC are now doing, but including an in depth study of Civics and Government.

    If you don’t know things work, how can you participate? It’s like asking a European to coach an American Football team. Can you imagine the look you’d get when you threw a soccer ball onto the field the first day and asked the team why they had on all that armor?
     
  9. Tez3

    Tez3 Sr. Grandmaster

    • Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    27,091
    Likes Received:
    4,483
    Trophy Points:
    308
    Location:
    England
  10. celtic_crippler

    celtic_crippler Senior Master

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,968
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Only you would miss the entire point of the post and focus in on something silly like that. Just create your own analogy after taking in the post...okay? I'm sure you'll get the gist. ..smh

    Bob, why I do I let you talk me into posting?
     
  11. Tez3

    Tez3 Sr. Grandmaster

    • Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    27,091
    Likes Received:
    4,483
    Trophy Points:
    308
    Location:
    England
    Who's Bob?

    You are only saying it's silly because you were caught out making not only a generalisation but managing to insinuate that Europeans are uneducated enough not to know what American football is, a small thing perhaps but telling.
    As for your longer post, you gave your opinion, I'm not going to argue with that, it's yours, only when you start posting your opinion as facts would I disagree.
     
  12. Makalakumu

    Makalakumu Gonzo Karate Apocalypse

    • MartialTalk Mentor
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2003
    Messages:
    13,887
    Likes Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Hawaii
    You're right, stupid is too inflammatory, ignorance fits...much of the time. Then, we need to take into account people who simply aren't willing to look at any new information or attempt to learn enough to judge for themselves. Sometimes, people identify so strongly with their "team" they don't want to hear counter information. I wonder if the whole idea of democracy simply produces this kind of polarization? The issues get so complex that people can't understand the nuances and suddenly they are relieved of the duty of thinking. Then, the only job they have left is to yell and scream about what they are told to believe and try to identify with a particular tribe of politicians.

    IMO, this goes beyond ignorance. It might have started as ignorance on the individual level, but as a collective...it becomes stupid.
     
  13. Makalakumu

    Makalakumu Gonzo Karate Apocalypse

    • MartialTalk Mentor
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2003
    Messages:
    13,887
    Likes Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Most people don't realize that in the early 1800's, before public education, literacy rates in the colonies were over 90%. The Last of the Mohicans was considered light reading.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_of_the_Mohicans
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Kembudo-Kai Kempoka

    Kembudo-Kai Kempoka Senior Master

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,227
    Likes Received:
    112
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Dana Point, CA
    As one trained in psychology, I agree ;)
     
  15. Kembudo-Kai Kempoka

    Kembudo-Kai Kempoka Senior Master

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,227
    Likes Received:
    112
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Dana Point, CA
    I have always despised the idea that anyone in the US can vote, and have that vote cancel out the thought-out and informed perspectives of politically astute persons, merely by turning 18 years of age.

    "Average" intelligence and education has plummeted in the US over the last 50, 75, 100 years. We have become, effectively, a nation of idiots. And this grand quorum picks representatives based on single-issue opinions, soundbytes, and -- for fricks sake -- name recognition on ballots. Yep. Buncha research into voting behaviour indicate that one of the number one variables influencing voters' selection is how often they have seen any given name on a ballot. The guy with the most postbills and yardsigns, wins.

    Stars and Stones... really?

    As a California resident, I chew over local representatives, their histories and qualifications, positions, and long-term ramifications of their positions in office. When Proposition and ballot initiatives come up, I read the hell out of them. I look up the websites of noted money-pacs behind the pro and con positions, read the blogs, listen to the talking heads debate their points, and do my damned best to make an informed choice as a responsible voter. I liken it now to taking a good piss in the wind: Some single issue idiot who never even passed grade school civics can cancel out my vote, merely because one of his stoned surfer buds told him he should like some person or some issue X.

    We have no-brainers that have come and gone, shot down because the "other side" threw more money at the name-recognition part of the campaign.

    I, sadly, agree with the title of the thread. I have seen it play an active role in the political tides for as long as I've been playing in the pool. I'm probably best categorized as a centrist Libertarian, because I tend to look at the folks in each of the main 2-parties in our political climate, and consider them too dense to think beyond their rhetoric. I vote issues, not parties; intelligent representatives of a process... not parties. Yet, I know countless folks from both sides of the aisle who cast patently stupid votes, simply because it's the position of their affiliated organization. F'n stupid. Reprehensible. Deplorable.

    And it's the good old U.S.of.A. One of the wealthiest, most consuming nations on the globe, and yet we are a village of idiots.

    Did I mention, I usually pretend I'm Canadian when I travel abroad?

    To quote an old t-shirt, "I'm not prejudiced... I hate everybody."

    D.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. celtic_crippler

    celtic_crippler Senior Master

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,968
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Would you please stop playing the victim for 5 minutes and stay on ^&#$% topic?

    That was not a %^&* insult!

    Jesus Christ!
     
  17. Sukerkin

    Sukerkin Have the courage to speak softly

    • MartialTalk Mentor
    • LifeTime Supporting Member
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    15,316
    Likes Received:
    479
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Staffordshire, England
    Little side excursion ... er ... put aside {:lol:} a very good thread with some illuminating opinions put forward. It just goes to prove what I have said several times about Martial talk, the strong but 'soft touch' regulation combined with encouragement of people to think about what they are saying often leads to some excellent discourse. I found myself dropping 'Thanks' on almost every post above ... I stopped because I realised I was clicking 'Thanks' on almost every post above :chuckles:.

    Take a bow my forum-mates :).
     
  18. celtic_crippler

    celtic_crippler Senior Master

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,968
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Allow me to return the favor. LOL
     
  19. Steve

    Steve Mostly Harmless

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    17,788
    Likes Received:
    3,588
    Trophy Points:
    308
    Location:
    Covington, WA
    Willful ignorance is sometimes a symptom of stupidity. :)


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
     
  20. granfire

    granfire Sr. Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2007
    Messages:
    15,013
    Likes Received:
    859
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    In Pain
    well, they say the difference between ignorance and stupidity is the willingness to learn...123
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

content