Maybe I'm commenting on the speculation and the investing of futures, which in a way, might touch on investing in Royalty Trusts. Either way, money is spent on speculating a future, and a future contract is created, right?
Nope, no futures markets, no speculation. The RT's are paying out money they received based on the previous month's sale of stuff they already pulled out of the ground.
Along that train of thought, I thought about things like energy costs (specifically Enron and my local Ameren), the price of crude oil, rice.... all commodities that can be bought and sold based on futures speculation. When something happens to detract from said speculation, things get hairy for the end consumer/user: prices go way up to the point where it gets uncomfortable to purchase.
"Speculation" on a "thing" is when an investor risks their money on a guess at what the future price might be for that thing.
So I might create a contract to sell 100 pounds of truffles at $100 per pound in September. If you buy that contract now in July, then you and I have a deal that I will sell you 100 pounds of truffles for $10,000 on Septmeber 1st. So your truffle supply for Septmeber is now guaranteed.
September 1st rolls around, and I've got to come up wth 100 pounds of truffles. I might have them sitting in my basement if so I send them to you and you pay me $10,000. if I don't have them on hand, then I have to buy them. if the market price on that day is $90 per pound, then I'll pay $9000, and make a $1000 profit. if the market price is $110, then I'll pay $11,000 and LOSE $1000. So you as the buyer might be paying a extra if the price dropped between July and Sept - that's a risk you were willing to take in order to guarantee a September supply.
Since I have a contrat to sell at $100/lb, I _really_ want the price of oil, oops I mean truffles, to go DOWN under $100/lb. And the buyer of that contract, the country (oops, I mean chef!) who needs it, wouldn't mind if the price went up becasue they already locked in a lower price. That is until they need to buy their next batch, then they will want it at the lowest price possible.
Now what if I was trying to sell my September truffles at $200/lb? Nobody in their right mind would buy it.
So, please explain how you see futures contracts and "speculation" driving up the price of oil? Do you realy know? or did someone on TV tell you so?
But that's just my point of view. I think it's immoral to basically advertise a form of investment that puts corporate profit first and basic humanity (essential needs) second. But that's my opinion, and I didn't mean to attack you.
There's nothing wrong with putting your family first. In fact, that's our very nature. If I had children, I'd make sure I'd do everything to make their lives easier than mine ever was. I get it. No need for the exclamation points.
I don't feel attacked. although you did just say I was immoral for creating this thread, right?
is cheap gasoline an "essential need"??
If you think there is even ONE form of investment that doesn't put profits first then you are living in a fantasy world. The ONLY reason to invest in anything it because you expect to make a profit of some kind. Otherwise it is not investing, it is SPENDING. That profit is not necessarily in cash, for example I beleive the money I spend on training my daughter in Kempo is a good investment because she is a braver, stronger, safer person because of it. The money I spent on ribeye steaks last night will pay no benefits to me in the future, so that is considered "spending".
A lot could be debated on setting one's morality solely on the family, especially in light of instant gratification. There's post graduate classes available that touch on the philosophy of consumerism in light of material wealth. There's good and bad sides to both.
But I stand by my statement and understand the initial advertisement. I did do my research, and it's not morally right for ME to invest in something like that.
Cheers.
I think you could start with the most basic "do what is right for me" and from there infer that there was good to be had for you in sacrificing for your family, tribe and species; because you are after all part of those groups and so what is good for them is good for you. But I didn't take any post-graduate classes in philosophy of consumerism etc. Did you? Were they a good INVESTMENT or were they they just time and money SPENT on personal indulgence?
I have to specualte that your reseach was not very deep or accurate because you still equate royalty trusts with futures contracts and somehow are demonizing those in realtionship to the price of oil and gasoline.